right on !
--
truckfighters
| Transporter | REDGUM RGASil OCC Silver Interconnects | REDGUM
RGi120ENR AMP | REDGUM LS Cable | B&W Nautilus 802 D |
>>> Live musicians at the end of my room! <<<
truckfighters's Profile: htt
Just placed another order at cdbaby.com - they got some nice solo piano
pieces, and send them an email if they're planning to offer lossless
downloads.
They replied enthusiastically that they just started to offer non
DRM-ed downloads... which of course happened to be MP3. I wrote back
explaining
the new one www.mp3skyline.com
low prices
--
Kainnik
Kainnik's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11862
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=31616
___
I started a new thread on safe resampling, so any new info will be
appreciated. In a light of already posted there information secret
rabbit code doesn't look good anymore...
BTW, anyone knows what sample rate converter used by Audacity? Their
wiki states Audacity uses more then one SRC, but doe
jmourik;182103 Wrote:
> Enhancement request created: bug 4774 (
> http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4774 )
Well done!
--
johann
johann's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10177
View this
I started a thread 'here'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32951) about the Linn
Records studio masters. If people could post there experiences there,
maybe we could make a wiki page on how to get this 24 bit sources to
work.
--
Eric Carroll
Transporter-Bryston 3B SST-Paradigm R
'This wikipedia page' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AllOfMP3.com) is
tracking the legal issues associated to AllofMP3.com and appears to be
updated on a near daily basis.
The gist of it is that US labels claim to have seen no payments at all
from the owner company, either direct or via license ag
bobschneider;181831 Wrote:
> Same here, now that I have my Li Te DAC-60. Using 88kHz FLAC files, SB3
> shows 88.2kHz, DAC shows 44.1kHz, and the music is at half speed from
> either the DAC or the SB3's analog outputs.
>
> I'll get the 88kHz WAV files scanned back in, and see how those work
> w
jmourik;181558 Wrote:
> I'd say with the TP being able to handle 96/24, wmadec should be able to
> handle it too :-)
Enhancement request created: bug 4774 (
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4774 )
--
jmourik
jm
It would be nice if this really worked as I'd hoped for.
+---+
|Filename: DSC00112.JPG |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2449|
+---
Phil Leigh;181986 Wrote:
> Even downsampled to 44.1 (using Audacity) these Linn 24-bit files sound
> fantastic.
Agree completely. These are great audiophile grade recordings.
--
Ben Diss
'SB3' (http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_squeezebox.html) -> 'Lavry DA10'
(http://www.lavryengineering.com/p
Eric Carroll;182058 Wrote:
> Will foobar upsample to 96KHz?
Yes, you can set the dsp resampler to output 96khz...
--
jmourik
jmourik's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7123
View this thread: http:/
Looks like this issue deserves a dedicated thread...
--
325xi
simaudio nova cdp >> simaudio moon i-5 >> revel performa m20 via
acoustic zen matrix reference ii and acoustic zen satori
-planned additions:... >> deq2496 >> lavry da-10 >>...-
-
I share the concerns. Downsampling to 20b/44.1 might be the safer way to
go, as this just throws out every other sample.
Its probably worth trying both and seeing if there is an audible
difference.
--
Eric Carroll
Transporter-Bryston 3B SST-Paradigm Reference Studio 60 v.4
SB3-Rotel RB890-B&
truckfighters;182067 Wrote:
> there are those dithering algorythms which "guess" the missing bits and
> calculate the (speaking of 88.2 kHz source!) very tiny, missing
> spaces...
The reason why I'm asking is that I remember that some older DSP
algorithms usually did more harm then good, and the
About the tools used for resampling of those Linn files... My
understanding is that resampling is quite dangerous thing if done not
carefully enough - all those tools do the job without introducing any
audible changes?
--
325xi
simaudio nova cdp >> simaudio moon i-5 >> revel performa m20 via
a
yes you'll probably be right there.
but resampling a 24 bit 88.2 kHz source up to 24 bit 96 kHz with all
the features "on" (high quality sampling and 32 bit floating integer
for calculations), I assume that the target file is at least sounding
the same as the source.
may be just a little bit "sm
i did the upsampling to 96 with audacity, but with straight wav
files...
they now play fine in transporter...
no problem to convert them into flac now...
make sure you check out all the settings in audacity first (high
quality sampling with 32bit floating integers and so on...)
wav export outp
jmourik;182022 Wrote:
> I use wmal2pcm to create the wav,
> then Foobar with "DSP Processing -> Resampler" to convert to 44.1
> then Foobar to convert to flac
>
Will foobar upsample to 96KHz?
I assume that getting the Transporter to play 88.2 will require
afirmware change...
--
Eric Carrol
Phil Leigh;182014 Wrote:
> The Linn is not DRM-d!
>
> I used the Microsoft utility (WMA2LPCM) to convert the 88.2/24-bit WMA
> to WAV and then Audacity to 44.1 24-bit WAV. Then I used the FLAC
> front-end to create a 24-bit 44.1 FLAC. A bit long-winded but worked
> fine...
I use wmal2pcm to crea
Eric Carroll;182010 Wrote:
> I am very interested in the Linn 24 bit material. However, I am
> committed to FLAC for long term use. Could someone point me in the
> right direction on how to go about converting WMA to FLAC? URL
> references are fine.
>
> Is the Linn WMA stuff DRMed in any way?
T
I am very interested in the Linn 24 bit material. However, I am
committed to FLAC for long term use. Could someone point me in the
right direction on how to go about converting WMA to FLAC? URL
references are fine.
Is the Linn WMA stuff DRMed in any way?
--
Eric Carroll
Transporter-Bryston 3B
Even downsampled to 44.1 (using Audacity) these Linn 24-bit files sound
fantastic.
--
Phil Leigh
Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/show
johann;181586 Wrote:
> I converted a 88.2 kHz/ 24 bit WMA to WAV and then to FLAC.
> The SB3 plays it and shows it to be 88.2 kHz but an external DAC shows
> the S/PDIF output as 44.1 kHZ.
Same here, now that I have my Li Te DAC-60. Using 88kHz FLAC files,
SB3 shows 88.2kHz, DAC shows 44.1kHz,
bobschneider;181590 Wrote:
> OOPS! I've now realized that, while the SB3 is playing the 88.2kHz FLAC
> files, it's playing them at half speed! I didn't notice this with the
> first couple of instrumental tracks I listened to (of music I'm not
> familar with), but it became blindingly obvious wi
bobschneider;181556 Wrote:
> Thanks. The album I'm using is Vivaldi by La Serenissima. I checked
> the WMA file in Windows Media Player, and Properties says it's an 88kHz
> file. So it looks like I got this right.
>
> Still quite a pain to have to do two conversions to get the file to
> play
I converted a 88.2 kHz/ 24 bit WMA to WAV and then to FLAC.
The SB3 plays it and shows it to be 88.2 kHz but an external DAC shows
the S/PDIF output as 44.1 kHZ.
--
johann
johann's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/me
bobschneider;181556 Wrote:
> I should be receiving a DAC that's capable of up to 96kHz (a Lite
> DAC-60) in the next couple of days. When I get a chance, I'll check to
> see if the SB3 can pass an 88kHz signal to it, using either WAV or FLAC
> files.
It probably can - the SB3 passes along digit
bobschneider;181556 Wrote:
> Thanks. The album I'm using is Vivaldi by La Serenissima. I checked
> the WMA file in Windows Media Player, and Properties says it's an 88kHz
> file. So it looks like I got this right.
>
> Still quite a pain to have to do two conversions to get the file to
> play
bobschneider;181556 Wrote:
> The album I'm using is Vivaldi by La Serenissima.
I'm going to try a track of that album, see how that sounds :-)
bobschneider;181556 Wrote:
> I should be receiving a DAC that's capable of up to 96kHz (a Lite
> DAC-60) in the next couple of days.
Me too, the PS Aud
johann;181546 Wrote:
> My first thought was: Good work!
>
> Then I reflected over the 88,2 kHz and I'm not sure wheter you asked a
> question for that perticular or not. In case you did, many of the files
> over at Linn Records actually are 88,2 kHz so if your song was such a
> file, that is jus
johann;181552 Wrote:
> I expect a new version of wmadec that does this properly.
Well, if Sean Adams is still following this thread, maybe he can tell
us if they're working on it or should we open a bug or enhancement
request. Sean, please?
I'd say with the TP being able to handle 96/24, wmadec s
jmourik;181547 Wrote:
> Ja, of course. I thought it was "if you assume you make an ass out of u
> and me" :-)
> I see you tested it too, you'll notice that the output wav of wmadec is
> a lot smaller than the output wav of wmal2pcm. Plus foobar can't play
> it...
That works too. :)
I've noticed
bobschneider;181515 Wrote:
> I transcoded a Linn Records WMA file to WAV using wmal2wav
Just being curious, which album was that?
--
jmourik
jmourik's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7123
View thi
johann;181436 Wrote:
> Assumption is the mother of all f**kups.
Ja, of course. I thought it was "if you assume you make an ass out of u
and me" :-)
I see you tested it too, you'll notice that the output wav of wmadec is
a lot smaller than the output wav of wmal2pcm. Plus foobar can't play
it...
bobschneider;181515 Wrote:
> I had the same thing. I transcoded a Linn Records WMA file to WAV using
> wmal2wav, and all I got through my SB3 was hiss. That file played fine
> on my computer, though.
>
> I then coverted the WAV to FLAC using xACT. I had to change some
> settings to let it acce
jmourik;180892 Wrote:
> I just tried this on a 24bit 44.1khz file from Linn Records (Barb Jungr
> - Waterloo Sunset, studio master). The wav file doesn't play, but the
> flac file encoded from that wav does (on my SB2)! They both show as
> 24bit in Foobar, flac=1474kbps, wav=2116kbps. They both p
jmourik;181383 Wrote:
> Because for -b it says "Valid values are 8 or 16" I assume it doesn't
> handle 24 bits.
Asumption is the mother of all f**kups.
--
johann
johann's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php
johann;181314 Wrote:
> I'm not sure how you know it's 16 bit in any of the cases.wmadec.exe Wrote:
>
> D:\Purchased Music>wmadec.exe -help
> wmadec.exe: illegal option -- e
> wmadec [-dqhw] [ -b bits_per_sample ] [ -r sample_rate ]
> [ -n num_channels ] [ -o outputfile ] [input]
> -dAdd
jmourik;181154 Wrote:
> When you use the wma -> wav decode (wmadec) it will be 16 bits, not 24.
> Which is why I used truckfighters method, using wmal2pcm.exe, then wav
> -> flac...
I had slimserver setup to to wma -> flac and wma -> wav, both worked
too.
I'm not sure how you know it's 16 bit
seanadams;181147 Wrote:
> It sounds like these files are not really 88.2 khz. What is the size of
> the WAV file in bytes, and how long is the track in seconds?
They are for sure, one of your support guys have one from me.
His name is is Anoop, I think.
--
johann
-
pfarrell;181192 Wrote:
> I tried to see what selection they had, and got this:
>
> We're sorry, only Microsoft Internet Explorer is supported.
>
> so they clearly don't want my money.
Should Read:
We're sorry, it's much easier for us to scrutinize files on your hard
drive and insert rootkits t
MusicDownloads.com uses DRM ...
--
Ben Diss
'SB3' (http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_squeezebox.html) -> 'Lavry DA10'
(http://www.lavryengineering.com/productspage_da_10.html) -> 'BAT
VK-31SE' (http://www.balanced.com/products/line/Vk-31SE/index.html) ->
'Halo A21' (http://www.parasound.com/halo/a
Jitterbug;169971 Wrote:
> I came across musicgiants.com but its selection is pretty limited.
I tried to see what selection they had, and got this:
We're sorry, only Microsoft Internet Explorer is supported.
so they clearly don't want my money.
--
pfarrell
Pat
johann;181129 Wrote:
> Works straigth away for me. Just downloaded the all the WMA files for
> that album, rescanned slimserver music lbryary and then they all played
> fine.
When you use the wma -> wav decode (wmadec) it will be 16 bits, not 24.
Which is why I used truckfighters method, using wm
It sounds like these files are not really 88.2 khz. What is the size of
the WAV file in bytes, and how long is the track in seconds?
--
seanadams
seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View
jmourik;180892 Wrote:
> I just tried this on a 24bit 44.1khz file from Linn Records (Barb Jungr
> - Waterloo Sunset, studio master). The wav file doesn't play, but the
> flac file encoded from that wav does (on my SB2)! They both show as
> 24bit in Foobar, flac=1474kbps, wav=2116kbps. They both p
truckfighters;174210 Wrote:
> tried the microsoft tool wmal2pcm.exe to convert the WMA to wav and it
> worked (for the file).
>
> but when playing the 24 bit 88 kHz (?) wav-file through transporter the
> only thing I heard was terrible 24 bit pink noise!
I just tried this on a 24bit 44.1khz file
48 matches
Mail list logo