m1abrams;357871 Wrote:
> And do not forget dbpoweramp has the best tagging ability of any ripper."To
> me EAC is not only a bit awkward, but also just a partial solution.
dbPoweramp not only does accurate ripping, but comnverts to any format
of choice reliably and *directly*. I settled on it a f
pablolie;357756 Wrote:
> To me EAC is not only a bit awkward, but also just a partial solution.
> dbPoweramp not only does accurate ripping, but comnverts to any format
> of choice reliably and *directly*. I settled on it a few versions ago,
> after going through the inevitable experimentation wi
To me EAC is not only a bit awkward, but also just a partial solution.
dbPoweramp not only does accurate ripping, but comnverts to any format
of choice reliably and *directly*. I settled on it a few versions ago,
after going through the inevitable experimentation with EAC and winamp.
I'll gladly p
kjg;356163 Wrote:
> Mark Lanctot wrote:
> > Nonreality;355413 Wrote:
> >> It could have at least mentioned dbpoweramp
> >
> > Agreed, although there are more than just those two, and the article
> > shouldn't have to go on for 20 pages...
> >
> >> and a better overall ripper and converter than
The article says "Sonos and Slim Devices both use very good
analog-to-digital converters in their products, which means you can
connect their analog outputs to a high-quality self-amplified speaker
system and get great results."
Surely they mean digital-to-analog convertors??
--
cbemoore
-
So you're saying Microsoft's claim that Windows is better falls on deaf
ears, in your case? ;-)
--
androidtopp
My SB3 is the most expensive part of my stereo. So I'm not going to brag
about it.
And my SBB as well...Is it wrong that my alarm clock is worth more than
most of my stereo components
kjg;356163 Wrote:
> Mark Lanctot wrote:
> > Nonreality;355413 Wrote:
> >> It could have at least mentioned dbpoweramp
> >
> > Agreed, although there are more than just those two, and the article
> > shouldn't have to go on for 20 pages...
> >
> >> and a better overall ripper and converter than
Mark Lanctot wrote:
> Nonreality;355413 Wrote:
>> It could have at least mentioned dbpoweramp
>
> Agreed, although there are more than just those two, and the article
> shouldn't have to go on for 20 pages...
>
>> and a better overall ripper and converter than EAC.
>
> That's a subjective opini
Mark Lanctot;356061 Wrote:
> That's a subjective opinion though.Let's say, that it's the "subjective
> opinion" of those who have used
both. ;)
--
Themis
SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Denon 3808 - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus
Nonreality;355413 Wrote:
> It could have at least mentioned dbpoweramp
Agreed, although there are more than just those two, and the article
shouldn't have to go on for 20 pages...
> and a better overall ripper and converter than EAC.
That's a subjective opinion though.
--
Mark Lanctot
Curr
Nonreality;355413 Wrote:
> Of course you have to pay for it.
Some don't even pay for their music, let alone the software...
...oh well. :(
--
Themis
SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Denon 3808 - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus
krochat;353927 Wrote:
> http://www.pcworld.com/article/152581/article.html?tk=nl_wbxhow
>
> SB, EAC, AccurateRip, etc.
It could have at least mentioned dbpoweramp as the owner of accuraterip
and a better overall ripper and converter than EAC. Of course you have
to pay for it.
--
Nonreality
12 matches
Mail list logo
