Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

On 2 April 2014 11:02, Simone Caronni wrote: > I will send a couple of patches soon. > No patches for a while, sorry. Dragged in by work. Kern, all of the blockers for the Fedora package have been resolved, so if you feel it is time for a release please go ahead. Thanks! --Simone -- You canno

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

On 2 April 2014 10:16, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Well, you will probably need to figure this one out, because the missing > files make up a part of the distribution, so I see no reason they should > not be there. Even if you do a "make distclean" theoretically they should > be rebuilt providing you

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

Hello Simone, Please see below ... On 04/02/2014 09:43 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: Good morning! On 2 April 2014 09:18, Kern Sibbald wrote: Wou

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

Hello Simone, Would you please pull the latest docs git repo.  I have made a modification to the Makefiles that will probably fix the problem you found that is shown below. Best regards, Kern On 04/01/2014 04:25 PM, Simone Caronni

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

Hello Simone, Wait just a bit. I have sent your output to my LaTeX expert.  Hopefully we can fix this quickly (perhaps by tomorrow).  If not, it will be best to open a bug report. Best regards, Kern On 04/01/2014 04:25 PM, Simone C

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

On 1 April 2014 16:02, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Building external references for main > make[1]: *** [external-references] Error 1 > > The error should not happen there. > > I suggest you manually enter the commands when it builds the > external-references to see what is failing. > Launching the c

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

Hello Simone, Yes, what I said was wrong.  pdflatex is used in the Enterprise version.  In the community version the target is as you say. I don't know what is going wrong.  However, it probably has to do with what is going on these two lines of outp

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

On 1 April 2014 15:25, Kern Sibbald wrote: > What is the command you are using. > > You should do: > > cd > make > > It seems to be doing something totally different -- pdfTex and I don't > think that code should be executed. It should be executing pdfLatex. In > addition, you are getting an e

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

What is the command you are using. You should do: cd make It seems to be doing something totally different -- pdfTex and I don't think that code should be executed. It should be executing pdfLatex.  In addition, you are getting an

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

On 1 April 2014 14:31, Kern Sibbald wrote: > 1. Pull the latest docs git repo Branch-7.0.0, and the file should be in > /latex > 2. I have attached the file here, and if you put it in the latex > subdirectory, it should be automatically picked up by LaTeX. > Thanks, this fixed the atxy.sty prob

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

Hello Simone, Apparently there are a number of places to get the atxy.sty file, but the easiest, I think is that I have now put a copy in the latex subdirectory of the docs, and I have now committed it to the git repo.  So, hopefully, here are

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

I have just asked the Bacula Systems Latex expert.  I am sorry, but will get back to you as soon as I can. Best regards, Kern On 04/01/2014 01:39 PM, Simone Caronni wrote: Just for the record, I've also added "export

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

Just for the record, I've also added "export TEXMFLOCAL=~/texmf" to the build, but this did not make the trick anyway. Thanks, --Simone On 1 April 2014 13:16, Simone Caronni wrote: > Thanks for the super fast debugging. > > On 1 April 2014 12:27, Kern Sibbald wrote: > >> I think I found your

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

Thanks for the super fast debugging. On 1 April 2014 12:27, Kern Sibbald wrote: > I think I found your problem. You probably don't have a ~/texmf > directory. I have just pushed a change to the git docs repo that > automatically creates it for you (I really don't like creating things like > ~

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

Hello Simone, I think I found your problem.  You probably don't have a ~/texmf directory.  I have just pushed a change to the git docs repo that automatically creates it for you (I really don't like creating things like ~/texmf, but that is what needed).

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

Hello Simone, I have tried rebuilding with a clean directory, but not yet from the source tar.bz2 file, and everything is fine. I have just pushed a few more cleanups to the manual to the public git repo, and in particular, there is a new document wh

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

Hello Simone, Can you give me more detail on where that error is coming from.  I don't seem to have or need atxy.sty in my setup.  However, it is used when building the Bacula Enterprise docs, so I am a bit surprised.  I haven't tried building from the tar

Re: [Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

On 01.04.2014 10:44, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to package the new bacula-docs-7.0.1 tarball, but I can't > rebuild the pdf documents with my distribution' supplied texlive > installation. > > It complains about a missing file: > > ! LaTeX Error: File `atxy.sty' not found. >

[Bacula-devel] Building bacula-docs 7.0.1

Hello, I'm trying to package the new bacula-docs-7.0.1 tarball, but I can't rebuild the pdf documents with my distribution' supplied texlive installation. It complains about a missing file: ! LaTeX Error: File `atxy.sty' not found. I'm not a latex/texlive exper, so can someone tell me where thi