Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] preliminary record refactoring patch

2007-05-24 Thread Chris Frey
If my spidey sense is tingling correctly, I suspect you are refactoring to make a Record base class that all other record classes are derived from. I have purposely avoided doing this, since I want to make sure that all record classes are dead simple, and STL container safe. I've done large hiera

Re: [Barry-devel] [patch] preliminary record refactoring patch

2007-05-24 Thread Chris Frey
Hi Brian, I spent some time today splitting the records classes into separate files, just haven't committed it yet. Do you have a compile error that this patch fixes? It looks like it mainly changes the name from Record to RecordT. - Chris On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 07:14:23PM -0600, Brian Edgin

[Barry-devel] [patch] preliminary record refactoring patch

2007-05-24 Thread Brian Edginton
Chris, Could you please add this patch. It fixes some potential namespace collisions in the templates in anticipation of refactoring the records classes. Thanks, -edge P.S. For anyone who cares and to save someone else work:I have Messages, PIN Messages and Saved Email Messages finished but I