archived since March 1997 [was: Re: Archive for this List?]

2001-01-08 Thread Marc A. Tamsky
A quick glance at my nnmh newsgroup for info-bbdb says I have rather complete looking archives going back to March 1997. I may have culled some articles for actual content, and what's left I saved. Anyone who can add it to the apparently "blessed" mail archive site http://www.mail-archive.co

Re: Fails to generate bbdb-autoloads.el

2001-01-08 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Could you please go to the lisp directory, type `make autoloads' and > show us the make output ? This target is not affected by the autoconf support, > apart from the fact that it uses the make variable `EMACS' which should appear > with a correct va

Re: Fails to generate bbdb-autoloads.el

2001-01-08 Thread Didier Verna
Sridhar Boovaraghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BBDB (CVS), Emacs 21.0.94, Win2k. > > I updated today and got the opportunity to try out the new configure > script. The configure worked fine. > > I was unable to generate the bbdb-autoloads.el. It gives me an empty > file with a single ^L cha

Fails to generate bbdb-autoloads.el

2001-01-08 Thread Sridhar Boovaraghavan
BBDB (CVS), Emacs 21.0.94, Win2k. I updated today and got the opportunity to try out the new configure script. The configure worked fine. I was unable to generate the bbdb-autoloads.el. It gives me an empty file with a single ^L character. Running this through bash and cmd.exe produced the same

Re: [ANNOUNCE] autoconf support for BBDB

2001-01-08 Thread Didier Verna
I wrote: > This message is to announce that I now have this working. Ronan would like > to have this in 2.2, so I will start to commit my work shortly. Done (see the ChangeLog below). Some notes: - new files are present in the repository, including the configure script. - some files ar

Re: Inconsistency in expanding mail aliases

2001-01-08 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Is this a bug? Feature. Check the variable bbdb-dwim-net-address-allow-redundancy. Cheers, Waider. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me. I really need to reinstate the witty comments, dammit. __

Re: Problem with bbdb.texinfo in latest CVS

2001-01-08 Thread Didier Verna
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David S. Goldberg) wrote: > I did a cvs update this morning (previous one was about three weeks > ago) and got this with makeinfo 4.0: > > $ make all > [...] > makeinfo texinfo/bbdb.texinfo > texinfo/bbdb.texinfo:3576: Unknown command `c@item'. > texinfo/bbdb.texinfo:3577: Unk

Re: Problem with bbdb.texinfo in latest CVS

2001-01-08 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I did a cvs update this morning (previous one was about three weeks > ago) and got this with makeinfo 4.0: > > $ make all > [...] > makeinfo texinfo/bbdb.texinfo > texinfo/bbdb.texinfo:3576: Unknown command `c@item'. > texinfo/bbdb.texinfo:3577: Unknown com

Inconsistency in expanding mail aliases

2001-01-08 Thread Sridhar Boovaraghavan
I am using BBDB 2.2 from CVS in VM 6.89 and Emacs 21.0.94/Windows 2k. I have noticed that while most aliases get expanded into the address of the form First Last , some only get the email. One of those entries have an alternate e-mail address - maybe that is one of the problems. These are two en

Problem with bbdb.texinfo in latest CVS

2001-01-08 Thread David S. Goldberg
I did a cvs update this morning (previous one was about three weeks ago) and got this with makeinfo 4.0: $ make all [...] makeinfo texinfo/bbdb.texinfo texinfo/bbdb.texinfo:3576: Unknown command `c@item'. texinfo/bbdb.texinfo:3577: Unknown command `c@b'. texinfo/bbdb.texinfo:3577: Misplaced {. te

Multiple data bases (Was: field encryption)

2001-01-08 Thread Mats Löfdahl
Chris Beggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ... I'm interested in sharing a .bbdb among users with unknown or > different levels of trust. Digressing from the encryption problem... Is there any way for BBDB to read two databases, where one is shared (and not written to) and one is personal (and u

Re: Multiple data bases (Was: field encryption)

2001-01-08 Thread Ronan Waide
On January 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > Digressing from the encryption problem... > > Is there any way for BBDB to read two databases, where one is shared > (and not written to) and one is personal (and updated when needed)? Not at present, although it's mentioned in the 2.2 TODO list from my