> Ronan wrote:
Ronan> Oh, right. Sorry, that expires records that haven't been seen
Ronan> in a long time. I was thinking of bbdb-obsolete-net.el in the
Ronan> bits directory.
Ronan> Or here:
Ronan> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01827.html
Thanks. Nearly what I wanted.
I
Ronan Waide wrote:
> I was thinking of bbdb-obsolete-net.el in the bits directory.
>
> Or here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01827.html
I was about to post a copy myself. :-)
--
Colin
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored b
On March 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Without looking at the code ... IMHO bbdb-expire does
> something different. I use a hook to ignore all but my
> inboxes for annotation and removed old addresses by hand,
> but then I do not get BBDB to show me those people anymore
> when browsing old folders.
On Wednesday, March 3, 2004 at 15:18:48, Ronan Waide wrote:
> On March 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I think a lot of people want this and no one has gotten around to
> > it.
> >
> > Adding net-old which is checked when asking 'do we know this
> > addr', but not used for completion, as you sugges
On March 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I think a lot of people want this and no one has gotten around to it.
>
> Adding net-old which is checked when asking 'do we know this addr',
> but not used for completion, as you suggest, would be great.
Actually, it has been done as an add-on rather than as
I think a lot of people want this and no one has gotten around to it.
Adding net-old which is checked when asking 'do we know this addr',
but not used for completion, as you suggest, would be great.
Along these lines, it would be nice if the 'address foo for bar is not
in the db. add?' query took
Hi,
Is there some way to ignore addresses that are old?
I guess the current workaround is to store them in the net attribute
or use some ignore hook for it. It would however be more precise if
there was a net-old attribute where these old not longer used
addresses could be stored. Or is there som
