Re: [PATCH] Fix X-Face display

2005-09-03 Thread Steve Youngs
* Reiner Steib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 01 2005, Steve Youngs wrote: >> - ((string-match "^21\\." emacs-version) ;; XXX how far back can I go? >> + ((emacs-version>= 21) ;; XXX how far back can I go? > Wouldn't if m

[PATCH] Fix X-Face display

2005-09-02 Thread Steve Youngs
05 06:12:38 - @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +2005-09-01 Steve Youngs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * lisp/bbdb-gui.el (bbdb-hack-x-face): Use `emacs-version>=' + instead of `string-match' against `emacs-version'. This fixes + X-Face display in SXEmacs now, a

Re: early versions of bbdb < 1.43?

2004-01-23 Thread Steve Youngs
* Bill White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone have an early version of bbdb lying about somewhere, > something earlier than 1.43? The earlier the better. 1.43 is the > oldest I've found via google. Have you asked jwz? -- |-| | Ashes to ashes, du

Re: X-Face and Face headers for Emacs...

2003-02-08 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "SY" == Steve Youngs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SY> (defun steve-bbdb-display-colour-face () SY> "Search for face properties and display the faces. SY> This is from Alex Shroeder." Of course, that doc string should say: "Disp

Re: X-Face and Face headers for Emacs...

2003-02-07 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "AS" == Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AS> Here is what I use in order to store both X-Face and Face headers, and AS> display them. Works for me. :) Very nice. Here's one for XEmacs... --- msg03414/bin0.bin Description: application/emacs-lisp --- I like to keep

[PATCH] Make use of customize for bbdb-pgp.el.

2002-10-19 Thread Steve Youngs
7 +++ ChangeLog 19 Oct 2002 12:22:24 - @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +2002-10-19 Steve Youngs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * bits/bbdb-pgp.el (bbdb-utilities-pgp): New. + (bbdb/pgp-field): defvar -> defcustom. + (bbdb/pgp-method): Ditto. + (bbdb/pgp-default-action): Ditto. +

Re: spam

2002-06-08 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "AS" == Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AS> I vote anybody can post to the list. My filtering is obviously good AS> enough; I didn't even notice all the spam. I saw the spam, but it was all in my spam bucket (God bless 'nnmail-split-fancy'). I'm with Alex, anyone should b

Re: Problems compiling from CVS for gnus

2002-02-21 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "SY" == Steve Youngs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SY> Configure Gnus with... SY> ./configure --with-xemacs \ SY> --with-lispdir=/usr/local/lib/xemacs/site-packages/lisp/gnus/ \ SY> --with-etcdir=/usr/local/lib/xemacs/site-packages/etc/gnus/ S

Re: Problems compiling from CVS for gnus

2002-02-21 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "Jack" == Jack Twilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>>"SY" == Steve Youngs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SY> Move your Gnus installation to: SY> /usr/local/lib/xemacs/site-packages/etc/gnus/[*.x[bp]m here] SY> /usr

Re: Problems compiling from CVS for gnus

2002-02-20 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "Jack" == Jack Twilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jack> Here's the output from M-x report-xemacs-bug: [...] Jack> Here's the output of xemacs -vanilla -debug-paths -kill 2>&1: [...] Jack> Hope that helps! I think so, yes. It would appear that you have Gnus installed into a non

Re: Problems compiling from CVS for gnus

2002-02-20 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "Jack" == Jack Twilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>"Ronan" == Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jack> [...] Ronan> In your reading of the Makefile, yes. The compile command is Ronan> the above PLUS the extra load paths you specify when Ronan> configuring, which is wh

Re: Problems compiling from CVS for gnus

2002-02-16 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "Jack" == Jack Twilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jack> gmake[1]: Entering directory `/v1/home/jmt/cvs/bbdb/lisp' Jack> Compiling /v1/home/jmt/cvs/bbdb/lisp/bbdb.el... Jack> Warning: Gnus not found. If you use Gnus, ensure it is in your `load-path' Well, is it? xemacs -no-site-fi

Re: Noticing things in hidden headers

2002-01-02 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "JM" == Jeff Mincy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JM> From: Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> JM> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:30:59 +0100 JM> On Wednesday, January 2, 2002 at 17:41:14, Steve Youngs wrote: >>Hey Folks! >>I finally

Re: Noticing things in hidden headers

2002-01-02 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "RF" == Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RF> On Wednesday, January 2, 2002 at 17:41:14, Steve Youngs wrote: >>I finally got sick of BBDB not noticing things in hidden headers (like >>X-Face's), so I wrote this horrible little hack:

Noticing things in hidden headers

2002-01-01 Thread Steve Youngs
Hey Folks! I finally got sick of BBDB not noticing things in hidden headers (like X-Face's), so I wrote this horrible little hack: , | (defun steve-bbdb-auto-notes-hook (record) | "Runs `bbdb-auto-notes-hook' after doing a `gnus-summary-toggle-header'. | | This is because BBDB won't notice

[PATCH] Add autoload cookie to 'bbdb-initialize'

2001-08-26 Thread Steve Youngs
geLog === RCS file: /cvsroot/bbdb/bbdb/ChangeLog,v retrieving revision 2.113 diff -u -w -U0 -r2.113 ChangeLog --- ChangeLog 2001/08/14 17:56:56 2.113 +++ ChangeLog 2001/08/26 06:37:17 @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +2001-08-26 Steve Youngs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + +

Re: M-x bbdb RET RET gives 'Wrong type argument: symbolp, (quoteface)'

2001-08-15 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "SY" == Steve Youngs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SY> Hello. SY> Anything I try to do with BBDB results in the error in the subject. Please disregard this report. It was just me doing stupid things. Sorry about that. -- |-| |

My last bug report 'Wrong type argument: symbolp, (quote face)'

2001-08-15 Thread Steve Youngs
Hi Please disregard that bug report. It was a broken record in my ~/.bbdb (which I broke messing around with xfaces). Please accept my apologies, I have a baby girl who thinks that Daddy shouldn't get any sleep. :-( -- |-| |XEmacs - It's not just an editor.

M-x bbdb RET RET gives 'Wrong type argument: symbolp, (quote face)'

2001-08-15 Thread Steve Youngs
Hello. Anything I try to do with BBDB results in the error in the subject. And I get the same thing with 'xemacs -vanilla'. Here's a back trace that I was able to collect (it has sensitive data removed). # bind (standard-output stack-trace-on-signal debug-on-signal stack-trace-on-error debu

Can't see X-Faces in the BBDB buffer

2001-08-13 Thread Steve Youngs
The subject pretty well says it all. Emacs : XEmacs 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" [Lucid] (i686-pc-linux, Mule) of Mon Aug 6 2001 on slackware Package: BBDB 2.32 current state: == (setq bbdb-version-date "$Date: 2001/03/04 20:27:21 $" bbdb-file-format 6 bbdb-no-duplicates-p nil bb

Re: xfaces in your buffer.

2001-08-13 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "RW" == Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RW> Okay, I don't have a working XEmacs with faces to test this on, so I'm RW> just looking at the code. Here's what it checks: RW> 1. As a basic requirement, you need EITHER XEmacs 21 OR something RW> needs to define 'highlight-head

Re: Displaying Xfaces in bbdb buffer

2001-08-13 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "APA" == Adrian Aichner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: APA> Steve, APA> have you seen APA> (defun bbdb-hack-x-face (face extent) APA> in bbdb-gui.el? APA> Is this what you're looking for? Yes, I found it today. How can I use it? Can I hang it off something like 'bbdb-mode-hook

Re: Displaying Xfaces in bbdb buffer

2001-08-09 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "VZ" == Volker Zell writes: >>>>>>"Steve" == Steve Youngs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> In the last 2 years that I've used BBDB I have seen xfaces in the bbdb Steve> buffer *once*. Steve> The manual says t

Displaying Xfaces in bbdb buffer

2001-08-03 Thread Steve Youngs
In the last 2 years that I've used BBDB I have seen xfaces in the bbdb buffer *once*. The manual says that it should "just happen" if you have xface support compiled into your XEmacs. Well, apart from that one off occasion, it doesn't for me. Is there anything I need to set for this to work? -

Re: Installing as xemacs package

2001-03-14 Thread Steve Youngs
|--==> "AG" == Arcady Genkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AG> I tried installing bbdb as an Xemacs package. It worked fine What do you mean by this? Just because you chuck some lisp files in the /xemacs-packages/ directory does not make it an XEmacs Package. AG> (although I think that the

Minor doc fixes to bbdb.

2000-11-07 Thread Steve Youngs
Hi The following doc fix was made by Martin Buchholz to our copy of bbdb.texinfo. It would be great if someone could include this patch in the next update of bbdb. Thanks. ./comm/bbdb/ChangeLog 2000-11-07 Martin Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * bbdb.texinfo: Doc fix. Index: comm/bbdb