OK we are up to 7500. Can anybody beat that?
Don't get me wrong. I'd be happy to have 10,000 entries. It's just
the gunzipping time, loading time, and processing time that matter.
Oh, and maybe memory. For me on just about any Sparc, anything above
1000 is too much.
(Funny about the Explorer
I don't know why you get so upset. With the automatic addition of your
record, my BBDB is up to 7471 entries. The only thought about this that
has come to mind is that my computer needs more RAM.
You are IN DENIAL. ALL of you.
2500 entries? You need to be CONFRONTED with your behavior. I, too,
was in denial and I have seen the light, and I am RECOVERING. So you
must be in denial also.
I acknowledge that I have lost control over my BBDB. I acknowledge
that a higher
*chuckle*
I want a macro that will figure out what I don't want FOR me.
Bill
> Jack recently wrote:
Jack> I find that I can reasonably describe large groups of
Jack> entries that I want to keep, but the remainder is a mixed
Jack> bag of keepers and trash, and I pretty much have to deal
Jack> with them one by one
[ and ]
Jack> But I am curio
Recently, Mats wrote:
Deleting selectively from the *BBDB* buffer is too
slow. Editing the bbdb-file has not been recommended in the
past but deleting complete entries might be failsafe?
What interests me about this whole discussion is the underlying
assumption that ther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I always do bbdb-changed before saving.
> My bbdb has 2500+ entries (400K).
2584.
Every few months I do M-x bbdb-notes ^$ and nuke anyone who doesn't look
interesting. Yeah, it takes forever. Knowing how hard it would be to
speed it up has made me a patient guy.
I always do bbdb-changed before saving.
My bbdb has 2500+ entries (400K).
To make bbdb more useful,
I think we need a way to easily trade sets of entries with other people.
(Do you have any intelligence to report?)
Also, removing the bbdb from emacs and putting it into it's own process.
A net in
> I recently wrote:
Mats> My bbdb has grown quite a lot since I started to use it. So
Mats> I would like to delete some of the records in order to bring
Mats> down its size. Unfortunately doing it by hand is very
Mats> slow. Ideas are welcome.
Huh... No ideas came in. When I
