On Tuesday, January 8, 2002 at 20:32:08, Galen Boyer wrote:
> If I have a few records showing in my BBDB, is there anyway to
> make the visible records remain while I search for a different
> string. The resulting bbdb buffer would be a union of the
> records from the anchored buffer and the "ju
On Friday Jan 18, 2002, Robert Fenk wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 8, 2002 at 20:32:08, Galen Boyer wrote:
> > If I have a few records showing in my BBDB, is there anyway to
> > make the visible records remain while I search for a different
> > string. The resulting bbdb buffer would be a union
On January 8, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> If I have a few records showing in my BBDB, is there anyway to
> make the visible records remain while I search for a different
> string. The resulting bbdb buffer would be a union of the
> records from the anchored buffer and the "just found" records.
Mos
On , January 8, 2002 at 23:38:14, Galen Boyer wrote:
> If I have a few records showing in my BBDB, is there anyway to
> make the visible records remain while I search for a different
> string. The resulting bbdb buffer would be a union of the
> records from the anchored buffer and the "just found
If I have a few records showing in my BBDB, is there anyway to
make the visible records remain while I search for a different
string. The resulting bbdb buffer would be a union of the
records from the anchored buffer and the "just found" records.
I could use this to quickly get a group of addres
