Re: [Newbies] Common/Best Practices on (Collaborative) Version Control

2008-08-27 Thread Edgar J. De Cleene
El 8/27/08 5:29 PM, "Göran Krampe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > But if you work internally in a company the *trivial* way to share is by > using a shared file directory on some file server. That's it. > > regards, Göran > You can have a common repository via shared directories or via nothi

Re: [Newbies] Common/Best Practices on (Collaborative) Version Control

2008-08-27 Thread Göran Krampe
Hi! Edgar J. De Cleene wrote: > El 8/27/08 7:37 AM, "Matthias Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: >> As far as I understand, Monticello does all the versioning and packaging >> stuff. But I currently do not see the collaborative part in that >> (without sending mcz-files via eMail). Also, we do no

RE: [Newbies] Common/Best Practices on (Collaborative) Version Control

2008-08-27 Thread Ramon Leon
> Version Control > > Hi all, > > we are a small group of people working together on a project > in Squeak. > > Now, I was wondering what the most common workflow for supporting > collaborative work in the Squeak environment is. > Like normally you would have a central SVN repository where ever

Re: [Newbies] Common/Best Practices on (Collaborative) Version Control

2008-08-27 Thread Edgar J. De Cleene
El 8/27/08 7:37 AM, "Matthias Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > As far as I understand, Monticello does all the versioning and packaging > stuff. But I currently do not see the collaborative part in that > (without sending mcz-files via eMail). Also, we do not want to publish > our project

[Newbies] Common/Best Practices on (Collaborative) Version Control

2008-08-27 Thread Matthias Korn
Hi all, we are a small group of people working together on a project in Squeak. Now, I was wondering what the most common workflow for supporting collaborative work in the Squeak environment is. Like normally you would have a central SVN repository where everyone could check their stuff in and th