Norbert,
There is a document I created with the intend to explain Monticello, SqueakMap
and SqueakSource, mostly to myself :) . It is not finished by far, so I hope
it will not mislead you (only the first third is what I would consider
finished, up to about step 1.4 and also skip the "Project T
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 21:33 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Norbert Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > at the moment I try to figure out how the three configuration
> > management approaches fit together. After switching to Monticello
>
> Mmmm, they are three quite diff
Hi!
Norbert Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at the moment I try to figure out how the three configuration
> management approaches fit together. After switching to Monticello
Mmmm, they are three quite different beasts. I wouldn't call SqueakMap a
"configuration management approach".
Hi,
at the moment I try to figure out how the three configuration
management approaches fit together. After switching to Monticello
I found my life a lot easier :) Monticello is of great help!
Then I noticed that changesets are named after the Monticello
package that was last imported. I'm not
