Don't forget Self.
http://research.sun.com/self/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self_programming_language
Oscar
On Nov 22, 2006, at 1:10, David Douthitt wrote:
Stephen Austin wrote:
On 11/21/06, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's a thing you have to deeply understand. In all
Brad Fuller wrote:
Search this mailing list. I and others recently posted documentation links.
Will do. Thanks!
--
Andrew Burton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://utilitarian.us - A Guide to Esoteric Technology in Paragon City
http://jarodrussell.livejournal.com/ - Take a guess. ;)
___
Andrew Burton wrote:
Tyler Sperry wrote:
-- but perhaps someone here will point out the Squeakish way of
creating "standalone" (in appearance, at least) applications.
I hope someone will.
Search this mailing list. I and others recently posted documentation links.
___
Tyler Sperry wrote:
-- but perhaps someone here will point out
the Squeakish way of creating "standalone" (in appearance, at least)
applications.
I hope someone will. I have no burning desire to create a "stand alone"
Squeak application, but it would still be interesting to know.
This is a
David Douthitt wrote:
How about Common LISP (with CLOS) and FORTH for two? FORTH isn't OOP,
but at least one author described how an OOP FORTH could be done (Dick
Pountain). FORTH doesn't save "images" as much as they utilize the
source code model: start up with the core, and load extensions
Hello David,
DD> How about Common LISP (with CLOS) and FORTH for two? FORTH isn't OOP,
DD> but at least one author described how an OOP FORTH could be done (Dick
DD> Pountain). FORTH doesn't save "images" as much as they utilize the
it's long ago, but IIRC save in Forth actually saved the imag
