[bess] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming

2026-03-02 Thread Kireeti Kompella 
Very sorry for the extremely late response. Luc, thanks for the comment — very much needed.The answer is that the Local Administrator SHOULD be set to zero when sending and non-zero values MUST be ignored on receipt. Does that jive with your expectation? I’m okay to change the SHOULD to a MUST if the WG thinks so, but personally feel that that’s a bit too strong. If there are no objections, I will update the draft post-Shenzhen. (Many thanks to Jeff Haas for guidance!)Kireeti


From:
Luc André Burdet 
Date: Monday, 30 June 2025 at 16:07
To: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) ,

[email protected] 
Cc: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming





 


CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL

nok.it/ext for additional information.




 
Hi Matthew,
 
I have a comment on the document: section 4.1 specifies the type and format for the Route Origin extended community, and normative Global Administrator field value. It’s
 silent on Local admin
The document should also specify a value (or ignore/discard procedure for nonzero values) for Local admin
 
Regards,
Luc André
 
Luc André Burdet |  Cisco  | 

[email protected]  |  Tel: +1 613 254 4814
 
 


From:
Matthew Bocci (Nokia) [email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 at 05:23
To: [email protected] 
Cc: [email protected] 
Subject: [bess] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming

This email begins a Working Group Last Call for 
draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming-06 - BGP based Multi-homing in Virtual Private LAN Service
 
Note that we already requested publication back in 2020, but the document died in the IESG due to a lack of an active editor. Kireeti has now kindly taken up that role (thanks!) and we felt that there was a particular need to publish the
 document as it requests allocation of several code points that were never allocated by IANA due to the draft’s lack of progress. However, there are known implementations. The process that we have agreed with our AD to get this back into IESG review is to run
 a short WG LC due to the time that has elapsed and then request publication again.
 
There are two IPR disclosures on the draft.
 
This WG LC closes on Wednesday 2nd July 2025.
 
Thanks
 
Matthew
 







___
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

[bess] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming

2026-03-02 Thread Kireeti Kompella 
On second thoughts, I’ll update the doc with the changes below, and modify that if there are any comments via email or at the BESS WG.  KireetiOn Mar 2, 2026, at 10:29, Kireeti Kompella  wrote:Very sorry for the extremely late response. Luc, thanks for the comment — very much needed.The answer is that the Local Administrator SHOULD be set to zero when sending and non-zero values MUST be ignored on receipt. Does that jive with your expectation? I’m okay to change the SHOULD to a MUST if the WG thinks so, but personally feel that that’s a bit too strong. If there are no objections, I will update the draft post-Shenzhen. (Many thanks to Jeff Haas for guidance!)Kireeti


From:
Luc André Burdet 
Date: Monday, 30 June 2025 at 16:07
To: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) ,

[email protected] 
Cc: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming





 


CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL

nok.it/ext for additional information.




 
Hi Matthew,
 
I have a comment on the document: section 4.1 specifies the type and format for the Route Origin extended community, and normative Global Administrator field value. It’s
 silent on Local admin
The document should also specify a value (or ignore/discard procedure for nonzero values) for Local admin
 
Regards,
Luc André
 
Luc André Burdet |  Cisco  | 

[email protected]  |  Tel: +1 613 254 4814
 
 


From:
Matthew Bocci (Nokia) [email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 at 05:23
To: [email protected] 
Cc: [email protected] 
Subject: [bess] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming

This email begins a Working Group Last Call for 
draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming-06 - BGP based Multi-homing in Virtual Private LAN Service
 
Note that we already requested publication back in 2020, but the document died in the IESG due to a lack of an active editor. Kireeti has now kindly taken up that role (thanks!) and we felt that there was a particular need to publish the
 document as it requests allocation of several code points that were never allocated by IANA due to the draft’s lack of progress. However, there are known implementations. The process that we have agreed with our AD to get this back into IESG review is to run
 a short WG LC due to the time that has elapsed and then request publication again.
 
There are two IPR disclosures on the draft.
 
This WG LC closes on Wednesday 2nd July 2025.
 
Thanks
 
Matthew
 







___
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

[bess] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming

2025-07-07 Thread Matthew Bocci (Nokia) 
This email closes the WG last call.

Authors: please can you address / respond to the comment from Luc Andre, below.

Best regards

Matthew



From: Luc André Burdet 
Date: Monday, 30 June 2025 at 16:07
To: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) , [email protected] 

Cc: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming

CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links 
or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.


Hi Matthew,

I have a comment on the document: section 4.1 specifies the type and format for 
the Route Origin extended community, and normative Global Administrator field 
value. It’s silent on Local admin
The document should also specify a value (or ignore/discard procedure for 
nonzero values) for Local admin

Regards,
Luc André

Luc André Burdet |  Cisco  |  [email protected]  |  Tel: +1 613 254 4814


From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) 
Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 at 05:23
To: [email protected] 
Cc: [email protected] 

Subject: [bess] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming
This email begins a Working Group Last Call for 
draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming-06 - BGP based Multi-homing in Virtual Private 
LAN Service

Note that we already requested publication back in 2020, but the document died 
in the IESG due to a lack of an active editor. Kireeti has now kindly taken up 
that role (thanks!) and we felt that there was a particular need to publish the 
document as it requests allocation of several code points that were never 
allocated by IANA due to the draft’s lack of progress. However, there are known 
implementations. The process that we have agreed with our AD to get this back 
into IESG review is to run a short WG LC due to the time that has elapsed and 
then request publication again.

There are two IPR disclosures on the draft.

This WG LC closes on Wednesday 2nd July 2025.

Thanks

Matthew

___
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

[bess] Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming

2025-06-30 Thread Luc André Burdet 
Hi Matthew,

I have a comment on the document: section 4.1 specifies the type and format for 
the Route Origin extended community, and normative Global Administrator field 
value. It’s silent on Local admin
The document should also specify a value (or ignore/discard procedure for 
nonzero values) for Local admin

Regards,
Luc André

Luc André Burdet |  Cisco  |  [email protected]  |  Tel: +1 613 254 4814


From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) 
Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 at 05:23
To: [email protected] 
Cc: [email protected] 

Subject: [bess] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming
This email begins a Working Group Last Call for 
draft-ietf-bess-vpls-multihoming-06 - BGP based Multi-homing in Virtual Private 
LAN Service

Note that we already requested publication back in 2020, but the document died 
in the IESG due to a lack of an active editor. Kireeti has now kindly taken up 
that role (thanks!) and we felt that there was a particular need to publish the 
document as it requests allocation of several code points that were never 
allocated by IANA due to the draft’s lack of progress. However, there are known 
implementations. The process that we have agreed with our AD to get this back 
into IESG review is to run a short WG LC due to the time that has elapsed and 
then request publication again.

There are two IPR disclosures on the draft.

This WG LC closes on Wednesday 2nd July 2025.

Thanks

Matthew

___
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]