>did u try aborting with the newer svn?
No, it was a couple of days old.
___
beta mailing list
beta@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/beta
did u try aborting with the newer svn?
--
MrSinatra
www.lion-radio.org
using:
sb2 & droid (my home) / duet & ipeng (parents' home) - sbs 7.5.5b -
win7 & xp pro sp3 ie9 - p4(ht) 3.2ghz, 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 -
d-link dir-655 - 49k+ mp3/flac
::VOTE FOR 'BUG 15604'
(http://bugs.slimdevices
>Michael r32969 has fixed this.
>
I was just testing this.
I started a rescan, and then suddenly remembered that I hadn't updated to
latest SVN version, so I aborted the scan.
Abort said it had finished the scan, but the scan was still running, and the
current phase continued to report progress
mherger;642021 Wrote:
> > Okay, closer look at the scanner log file indicates that it has
> discovered shortcuts in my SBS music library folder, and it reports
> Discovering and Scanning phases per shortcut. It doesn't seem to
> remember Discovering/Scanning phases that had previously completed
>Good catch. I was investigating similar issues with LMS yesterday and came to
>the conclusion that the current progress logging doesn't work well with the
>new scanner code. Above description pretty much nails it down: looking at the
>code you'd see that for linked folders a new scan is started
> Okay, closer look at the scanner log file indicates that it has discovered
> shortcuts in my SBS music library folder, and it reports Discovering and
> Scanning phases per shortcut. It doesn't seem to remember
> Discovering/Scanning phases that had previously completed - they get
> replaced,
MrC;642008 Wrote:
> It seems inherently nonsensical that a vote is not cast automatically
> when an author enters a bug. I don't many even realize this is
> necessary... who would think it was?
i agree, but every new bug has no votes. didn't take me long to
realize it.
now, one can argue vote
MrSinatra;642007 Wrote:
> http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17322
>
> why don't people vote for their own bugs?
It seems inherently nonsensical that a vote is not cast automatically
when an author enters a bug. I don't many even realize this is
necessary... who would think it was?
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17322
why don't people vote for their own bugs?
--
MrSinatra
www.lion-radio.org
using:
sb2 & droid (my home) / duet & ipeng (parents' home) - sbs 7.5.5b -
win7 & xp pro sp3 ie9 - p4(ht) 3.2ghz, 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 -
d-link dir-655 - 49k+ mp
MrSinatra;642002 Wrote:
> imo, SBS has never given reliable stats. i filed a bug YEARS ago
> showing all the ways it contradicts itself statwise.
We're not talking about reliable, so much as consistent. Artist counts
are very open to interpretation. And album counts will differ depending
on whe
JJZolx;642001 Wrote:
> FWIW, I have identical track, album and artist counts in 7.5 and 7.6. My
> library may be tagged differently than yours, of course. I don't use any
> COMPOSER tags, for instance.
>
> Are leading and trailing spaces in names now _supposed_ to be
> significant, or was this a
FWIW, I have identical track, album and artist counts in 7.5 and 7.6. My
library may be tagged differently than yours, of course. I don't use any
COMPOSER tags, for instance.
Are leading and trailing spaces in names now _supposed_ to be
significant, or was this an oversight? I recall it being men
>Pretty sure the albums will be a disknumber thing... (or see below)
>
I have almost no albums with disc numbers - I generally remove disknumbers when
I rip albums - eg. a 2 disc album will be a single album in my library with
track numbers running contiguously.
I have perhaps got one or two alb
Philip Meyer;641994 Wrote:
> >> Looking at the scanner log, I can see the scan started at 21:03:18,
> and
> >> finished at 21:50:42. Duration = 47 mins.
> >> 47 mins is only about 5 mins quicker than SBS 7.5.5.
> >
> >total number of files?
>
> SBS 7.6:
> 3723 albums with 40546 songs by 16
>You mean in the main window, not the Settings window, correct? Yes,
>I've noticed this too. Then again, I've always had problems with the
>main window not always updating the status message shown at the bottom.
>Most commonly in 7.5, when a scan would finish the message would never
>be updated and
>> Looking at the scanner log, I can see the scan started at 21:03:18, and
>> finished at 21:50:42. Duration = 47 mins.
>> 47 mins is only about 5 mins quicker than SBS 7.5.5.
>
>total number of files?
SBS 7.6:
3723 albums with 40546 songs by 1653 artists.
SBS 7.5.5:
3728 albums w
I installed a 2Tb disk and got rid of my shortcuts a year ago :-)
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
Touch(wired/XP) - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103
- full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK
Philip Meyer;641955 Wrote:
> Okay, closer look at the scanner log file indicates that it has
> discovered shortcuts in my SBS music library folder, and it reports
> Discovering and Scanning phases per shortcut. It doesn't seem to
> remember Discovering/Scanning phases that had previously complet
Philip Meyer;641950 Wrote:
> 1. When 7.6 is started and there's no music library, it starts an
> implicit scan, but it doesn't report scan progress in the web UI (used
> to appear at bottom of screen).
You mean in the main window, not the Settings window, correct? Yes,
I've noticed this too. The
Philip Meyer;641971 Wrote:
> >It doesn't seem to remember Discovering/Scanning phases that had
> previously completed - they get replaced, and the times taken for those
> phases are lost.
>
> So my scan has finally finished. The Web UI Music Scan Details section
> reported:
>
> The serve
it really bothers me that the software won't at the very least, allow
you to opt out of a scan when installing or upgrading or whatever, and
also allow you to simply opt out of all automatic scanning of any
type.
SBS should not just take it upon itself to initiate scans just b/c
there is no music
>It doesn't seem to remember Discovering/Scanning phases that had previously
>completed - they get replaced, and the times taken for those phases are lost.
So my scan has finally finished. The Web UI Music Scan Details section
reported:
The server has finished scanning your music colle
>5. The implicit full scan started. Initially it reported:
>
> Discovering files (6049 of 6049) Complete 00:00:14
> Scanning new files (2836 of 5401) Running 00:01:09
>
>then it changed to:
>
> Scanning new files (5401 of 5401) Complete 00:02:16
> Discovering
Now that the 7.6 scanner random crashing seems to be fixed, I've tried a scan
and have some subsequent observations:
1. When 7.6 is started and there's no music library, it starts an implicit
scan, but it doesn't report scan progress in the web UI (used to appear at
bottom of screen).
2. Previ
24 matches
Mail list logo
