Re: [blfs-support] at-spi2-core-2.10.1 build fails

On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 09:43 +, John Frankish wrote: > Indeed - I'd mistyped the cc -> gcc symlink, after correcting it, things work > > Thanks for that, it would have taken me a long time to discover :) Yeah, being a Python coder helps when you're confronted by a stack trace like that one...

Re: [blfs-support] Comment/Question/Flame on "probably the most used admin tool", 'find'

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > alex lupu wrote: > >> I'm saddened that after all these years there's apparently no easy way > to > >> do something like (expressed in Artificial Intelligence :): > >> "Find files modified (accessed, created) in a range o

Re: [blfs-support] Comment/Question/Flame on "probably the most used admin tool", 'find'

Bruce Dubbs wrote: > alex lupu wrote: >> I'm saddened that after all these years there's apparently no easy way to >> do something like (expressed in Artificial Intelligence :): >> "Find files modified (accessed, created) in a range of time (in minutes)" >> "After but Before a time in minutes ago".

Re: [blfs-support] Comment/Question/Flame on "probably the most used admin tool", 'find'

alex lupu wrote: > I'm saddened that after all these years there's apparently no easy way to > do something like (expressed in Artificial Intelligence :): > "Find files modified (accessed, created) in a range of time (in minutes)" > "After but Before a time in minutes ago". > > Most people with PhD

Re: [blfs-support] Comment/Question/Flame on "probably the most used admin tool", 'find'

On 11/04/2013 02:36 PM, alex lupu wrote: I'm saddened that after all these years there's apparently no easy way to do something like (expressed in Artificial Intelligence :): "Find files modified (accessed, created) in a range of time (in minutes)" "After but Before a time in minutes ago". Most

[blfs-support] Comment/Question/Flame on "probably the most used admin tool", 'find'

I'm saddened that after all these years there's apparently no easy way to do something like (expressed in Artificial Intelligence :): "Find files modified (accessed, created) in a range of time (in minutes)" "After but Before a time in minutes ago". Most people with PhD's in "find", claim you cann

[blfs-support] libvpx-v1.2.0 MD5SUM

Fernando, Bruce: Thank you very much. Cheers, -- Alex -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-support] Xorg-7.7 Does not Detect Input Devices on 64-bit Build

On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 08:03:09AM +, John Frankish wrote: > > > > > > 10-evdev.conf is at /usr/local/share/X11/xorg.conf.d and verified to be > > > the > > > same as the 32-bit install, which works. > > > > I'm not sure I follow that : did you verify the file's contents or > > it's locatio

Re: [blfs-support] noshell

Simon Geard wrote: > On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 11:03 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I'm unaware why noshell would be an advantage over /bin/false. What >> does it do that is needed? > > Most google results indicate that it's to do with logging - that noshell > will report that someone attempted to obtai

Re: [blfs-support] typo in gst-plugins-bad-0.10.23?

Walter P. Little wrote: > For gst-plugins-bad-0.10.23 ( > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/stable/multimedia/gst-plugins-bad.html), > I just noticed that FAAC-1.28 is listed both in "recommended" and > "optional." Seems like it should just be in one of the categories (perhaps > it got pro

[blfs-support] saslauthd port?? question

does anyone know if saslauthd has a port it listens to ? ( in otherwords are there iptabless rules for cyrus-sasl? ) thanks in advance -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[blfs-support] typo in gst-plugins-bad-0.10.23?

For gst-plugins-bad-0.10.23 ( http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/stable/multimedia/gst-plugins-bad.html), I just noticed that FAAC-1.28 is listed both in "recommended" and "optional." Seems like it should just be in one of the categories (perhaps it got promoted to recommended at some point

Re: [blfs-support] Process accounting

Am Sonntag, 3. November 2013, 16:30:32 schrieb Richard Melville: > > Still on the subject of server hardening I was looking for > > acct-6.6.1.tar.gz in the > > BLFS book and couldn't find it. Is there any reason why this is omitted; > > has process a

Re: [blfs-support] noshell

On 4 November 2013 07:00, wrote: > Send blfs-support mailing list submissions to > Richard Melville wrote: > > Does anybody have any experience of noshell as a replacement for > /bin/false > > and /dev/null? I realise that it's quite old, but is it still useful as > a > > more secure way of cre

Re: [blfs-support] at-spi2-core-2.10.1 build fails

> > This must be related to gobject-introspection. Is it installed? > > It's definitely installed, because that's precisely the thing failing... > the invocation of /usr/local/bin/g-ir-scanner. > >A quick look at the code appearing in the stack trace: > > https://github.com/GNOME/gobject-introspect

Re: [blfs-support] Xorg-7.7 Does not Detect Input Devices on 64-bit Build

> > > BUT the first mentions of evdev in my log are > > > > > > [ 23798.003] (II) config/udev: Adding input device Power > > > Button(/dev/input/event1) > > > [ 23798.004] (**) Power Button: Applying InputClass "evdev keyboard > > > catchall" > > > [ 23798.004] (**) Power Button: Applying InputCl