--- Em sex, 26/11/10, Andre Keller escreveu:
> De: Andre Keller
> Assunto: Re: OpenOffice 3.2.1 on x86_64
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Sexta-feira, 26 de Novembro de 2010, 21:16
> Am 26.11.2010 03:19, schrieb Stuart
> Stegall:
> > I was able to
On 11/26/2010 09:53 PM, Andre Keller wrote:
> On 27.11.2010 04:08, schrieb DJ Lucas:
>> I'd try and use --with-system-db in the OOo build.
>
> Yeah I thought about this too, there are other tools like libxml2,
> libxmlsec, mysql, mozilla, etc.) which could be taken from the system
> instead of bu
ixing some issues left during the build.
Now just let me share the last problem I had to solve, building
OpenOffice-3.2.1.
The chapter in BLFS is very good, but will not allow successful building,
without some minor modifications (which took me quite a while to find the the
solution).
Fir
On Saturday 28 August 2010 11:26:23 luxInteg wrote:
> ( http://download.openoffice.org/other.html#tested-sdk ) seems to be rpm
> and deb
>
> So I would be grateful for some advice on how to get this sdk on the setup
> I am using.
sorted
I learnt how to use the deb
--
http://linuxfromscratch.
Greetings,
I have openoffice OOO320_m12 compiled on a machine with these:
---cpu amd64 2cores
---o/s linux pure 64-bit cblfs
---gcc-4.4.2, kde-4.4.5
I am attempting to build koffice-2.2.1 on top. The latter uses cmake.
The file FindOOoSDK.cmake has the following
t; ~/instsetoo_native/util
>> -
>> No EPM: do no packaging at this stage
>> rmdir /tmp/7113
>> ##
>>
> I did two things and the build now generates the required
> binaries/libraries etc. I did
> a): removed --disab
7113
> ##
I did two things and the build now generates the required
binaries/libraries etc. I did
a): removed --disable-epm from the configure script
b): added before bootstrap (before build)
export LOCALINSTALLDIR="/opt/openoffice-3.0.1"
export
inc_openoffice/unix
build
deliver
I get
build: command not found
deliver: command not found
If I follow the blfs suggestion for OO-2.3.1 and do
###
pushd
instsetoo_native/unixlngx6.pro/OpenOffice/install/en-US/linux-2.6-x86_64/buildroot/opt
I get
no OpenOffice directory in
lux-integ wrote:
> /opt/jdk/jdk/bin/javac -classpath
> ".:../unxlngx6.pro/class:/opt/jdk/jdk/jre/lib/rt.jar:.:~/003Build/OOO300_m15/solver/300/unxlngx6.pro/bin/ridl.jar:~/003Build/OOO300_m15/solver/300/unxlngx6.pro/bin/unoil.jar:~/003Build/OOO300_m15/solver/300/unxlngx6.pro/bin/jurt.jar:~/003Buil
ib:$CLASSPATH"
## end of install sequence for jdk
The above class path is modified from that which I used from the cblfs website
for 1 build (~7 hours) --with-java in the configure script.After update
I then tried another openoffice-3.0.1 compilation --with-j
lux-integ wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
> For java, only a binary was available. This
> was jdk-1_5_0_16-linux-amd64.bindownloaded from Sun.
Your version of Java's original release is over 5 years old. The _16 at
the end of the version means that it's the 16th maintenance update.
Curr
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:25 AM, lux-integ wrote:
> 1) will compiling --with-Xlint help or will this just provide more details
> why the compilation failed?
Xlint just provides more detailed warnings--it's not even related to
the actual errors you're seeing.
> 2) Ais there some error in the
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:29 AM, jignesh gangani wrote:
> Hi lux-inetg,
>
> This is just a suggestion. Try using OpenJDK (http://openjdk.java.net)
> which will
> allow you to build java and then try compiling OOo3.
>
Or, if you don't wanna go through the trouble of using OpenJDK, use
the 6.0 versi
Hi lux-inetg,
This is just a suggestion. Try using OpenJDK (http://openjdk.java.net)
which will
allow you to build java and then try compiling OOo3.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:55 PM, lux-integ wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
> I am attempting to compile openoffice-3.0.1 The box runs clfs
Greetings,
I am attempting to compile openoffice-3.0.1 The box runs clfs 64Bit -amd64
kernel-2.6.27.7 gcc-4.3.2. For java, only a binary was available. This
was jdk-1_5_0_16-linux-amd64.bindownloaded from Sun.
I attempted to compile openoffice-3.0.1 and it compiles
is there anyone on list with experience of compiling openoffice-3.0.1?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I've tried to compile OpenOffice both as unprivileged user as well as root.
As unprivileged user, 'dmake' stops without error at this point:
> --
> Making: ../../unxlngi6.pro/slo/cairo_cairo.obj
> g++ [snipped]
> ---* tg_merge.mk
o I wouldn't mess up my whole install.
Rebooted into the new BLFS system
Followed the instruction exactly (deviating only in configure options)
and waited
5+ hours later, I had a completely new OpenOffice-2.3.1
I am now going to research the permissions, partitions, and umask
information so th
rblythe wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> It seems I am having trouble building OpenOffice-2.3.1
> I am using gcc-4.2.2
> I am using the blfs-svn instructions
> I have followed the instructions with no deviations except for the
> configure portion
> which is:
> ./configu
Hello everyone,
It seems I am having trouble building OpenOffice-2.3.1
I am using gcc-4.2.2
I am using the blfs-svn instructions
I have followed the instructions with no deviations except for the
configure portion
which is:
./configure --prefix=/opt/openoffice-2.3.1 \
--enable-libart \
--disable
Alonso Graterol wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While installing OOo-2.3.1 in an AMD64 Pure64 CLFS SVN-20070923 with
> kernel 2.6.22.15 I get the following error, with the configuring
> parameters indicated
>
> ./configure --prefix=/opt/openoffice-2.3.1 --enable-libart
> --disable
Being rather busy lately I came across your reply only yesterday ...
DJ Lucas wrote:
> You cannot access the Windows registry in strait Java. The reg lib quit
> shipping in 2.0.4 so you have to build it (or you can cheat and acquire
> it and drop it into external). Is there a reason you've buil
Hans-Joachim Widmaier wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> As one of the most complex beasts in a (B)LFS installation, Openoffice
> behaves accordingly ...
>
Funny..I really didn't have many problems with this update.
> I've just (almost) finished a brand new installation, start
Hello all,
As one of the most complex beasts in a (B)LFS installation, Openoffice
behaves accordingly ...
I've just (almost) finished a brand new installation, starting on new
year's eve with the then-current LFS (gcc-4.2.2, glibc-2.7). While it go
as smoothly as hoped, I reached one o
On 7/8/07, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a system based on the 6.2 book. I have been very happy with the BLFS
> additions so far, but now I want to install OpenOffice, and I am very
> intimidated by the 129 SBU build time, I am willing to "cheat"
Hi all,
I have a system based on the 6.2 book. I have been very happy with the BLFS
additions so far, but now I want to install OpenOffice, and I am very
intimidated by the 129 SBU build time, I am willing to "cheat" and do an
install similar to what I did on my Windows system: big do
atch
#found in http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66906
#URL:
http://www.openoffice.org/nonav/issues/showattachment.cgi/39575/i66906.patch
# #openoffice 2.0.3 freetype internal ... openoffice glyphs
build_instsetoo_native invalid conversion
patch -Np0 -i ../vcl
> Well, if I look into the hungarian FTP site [1], I see a source
> package, which must be the hungarian source.'
Yes, that's right. I didn't see it.
> Oh, ok, I have a few hundred binary's on my LFS system that won't run,
> they all give a different error, do you guys want to help me out? I
> gue
On 5/21/07, Zsolt Udvari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But my question is not "supported" by this list, please skip it!
No, I didn't say that, I were only asking what it had to do with BLFS.
> > What does this have to do with BLFS?
> Why I didn't install from scratch:
> 1. It's too many time and I
On Sun, 20 May 2007 21:11:17 +0200
"Zsolt Udvari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have a problem with OpenOffice 2.2.
>
> If I run e.g. "swriter" from terminal:
>
> /bin/soffice: line 236: 5959 Segmentation fault
> "$sd_prog/$
Zsolt Udvari wrote:
>> What does this have to do with BLFS?
> But my question is not "supported" by this list, please skip it!
>
> Zsolt
As Randy has just said too, this is not the case Zsolt.
If anyone has something to suggest I'm sure they will. Your question is
no less valid than many other
> What does this have to do with BLFS?
Why I didn't install from scratch:
1. It's too many time and I use it only sometimes (writing articles
and see any ppt and doc files).
2. Hungarian edition isn't available from scratch.
The question was that I sended it to the "BLFS support list." Why?
1. I'm
t someone has issues with a binary version
of OpenOffice, then we help if we can.
We don't simply dismiss the question as you have done. Jeez,
a BLFS editor just in the last few days said he was going to
install a binary version of OpenOffice just to get a handle
on the package.
Please, reco
On 5/20/07, Zsolt Udvari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have a problem with OpenOffice 2.2.
>
> If I run e.g. "swriter" from terminal:
>
> /bin/soffice: line 236: 5959 Segmentation fault "$sd_prog/$sd_binary"
> "$@"
Hello!
I have a problem with OpenOffice 2.2.
If I run e.g. "swriter" from terminal:
/bin/soffice: line 236: 5959 Segmentation fault "$sd_prog/$sd_binary" "$@"
This OpenOffice is downloaded from
http://ftp.fsf.hu/OpenOffice.org_hu/2.2.0/OpenOffice.org_2.2
On 5/4/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Don't be confused, do a bit of research instead. Because if you
> did, you'd see that Apache Ant is required by OpenOffice and the
> JDK is required by Apache Ant. So, the JDK *is* required by
> OpenOffice acco
e Sun programmers
understand it fully :)
But, i found a ticket, that also reports problems with JDK & OpenOffice:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/2020
Try applying that patch and see if it works.
Tijnema
I applied the patch, and after renaming the beanshell/unxlngi6.pro/misc/
On 5/4/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tijnema ! wrote:
>
> > I checked the BLFS book for OpenOffice, and i'm confused now, java
> > isn't listed as a dependency there. (No JRE/JDK)
>
> Don't be confused, do a bit of research instead. Be
Tijnema ! wrote:
> I checked the BLFS book for OpenOffice, and i'm confused now, java
> isn't listed as a dependency there. (No JRE/JDK)
Don't be confused, do a bit of research instead. Because if you
did, you'd see that Apache Ant is required by OpenOffice and the
JDK
gt; the actual problem is.
> >
> > Tijnema
>
> Yeh, I took a look, but grew rather confused.
> The file is attached with the e-mail.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
Hmm, it's low level debug information, only some Sun programmers
understand it fully :)
I checked the BLFS
On 04/05/07, Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you checked the log file that was created? Maybe you can send it
to this list so that others can take a look at it and find out where
the actual problem is.
Tijnema
Yeh, I took a look, but grew rather confused.
The file is attached with
On 5/4/07, michael lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it matter if I didn't compile the JDK, but just use the pre-compiled,
> downloadable version from sun? Anyways, I tried upgrading to jdk1.6.0_01,
> instead of using jdk1.5.0_11, and I still get the same message. And yes, I
> did edit all th
Would it matter if I didn't compile the JDK, but just use the pre-compiled,
downloadable version from sun? Anyways, I tried upgrading to jdk1.6.0_01,
instead of using jdk1.5.0_11, and I still get the same message. And yes, I
did edit all the environment variables accordingly.
--
http://linuxfroms
On 5/3/07, michael lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After compiling for errors, I painfully got the following error of which a
> quick google search showed up 0 results:
>
> java -Xms256m -Xmx256m
> -Djava.library.path=/home/oipo/BLFS/OOC680_m7/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/lib
> -Djavax.xml.parsers.SAX
After compiling for errors, I painfully got the following error of which a
quick google search showed up 0 results:
java -Xms256m -Xmx256m -
Djava.library.path=/home/oipo/BLFS/OOC680_m7/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/lib -
Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl-
Stef Bon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> at this moment it's compiling. It looks good so far.
>
>
> Till soon I hope... after this build. It's still compiling. I think it
> started at 14.00, it's now 18.45.
>
> Stef Bon
>
>
>
yesterday it was finished. The build was succesfull! The new OO I'm using
now
2.0.3-xauth-1.patch and
unowinreg.dll
The configure script I'm using looks like:
/configure --prefix=/opt/openoffice-2.1.0 \
--enable-libart --disable-fontooo --disable-gnome-vfs \
--without-fonts --with-system-stdlibs --with-system-freetype \
--with-system-ex
ources/unowinreg.dll .
cd -
umask 0022
unset LANG LC_ALL
./bootstrap
. LinuxIntelEnv.Set.sh
dmake
cd config
cd config_office/
./configure --prefix=/opt/openoffice-2.1.0 \
--enable-libart --disable-fontooo \
--disable-gnome-vfs \
--without-fonts \
--with-system-stdlibs \
--with-system-freetype \
--with-sys
te:
Hi there
I have some problems with compilnig openoffice-2.0.3 from BLFS-20061028.
I have installed all required and recommendend without problem.
My configure command had the following options:
./configure --prefix=/opt/openoffice-2.0.3 --enable-libart \
--enable-libsn --disable-fontooo
Hi there
I have some problems with compilnig openoffice-2.0.3 from BLFS-20061028.
I have installed all required and recommendend without problem.
My configure command had the following options:
./configure --prefix=/opt/openoffice-2.0.3 --enable-libart \
--enable-libsn --disable-fontooo
-0.10) of Gnome it tells only about the Audiophile with alsa
>>>> and an unknown (OSS mixer).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The driver for Audigy is not Emu10k1, but ca106.
>>>
>>> Guillaume Chevallereau
>>>
).
>>>
>>>
>> The driver for Audigy is not Emu10k1, but ca106.
>>
>> Guillaume Chevallereau
>>
>>
> Thanks Guillaume, I will now update the kernel.
>
> Right now I finally managed to build OpenOffice-2.0.3 with all the
> option
t;
> Guillaume Chevallereau
>
Thanks Guillaume, I will now update the kernel.
Right now I finally managed to build OpenOffice-2.0.3 with all the
optional switches I passed, it took about 10 hours to compile... had to
remove the --with-system-portaudio, have not passed the --enable-cairo
and buil
Selon Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> another problem with sound-cards, I have a M Audio Audiophile 24/96 and
> a SoundBlaster Audigy, compiled the drivers as modules and insert the
> following in /etc/modprobe.conf
> "options snd-emu10k1 index=0
> options snd-ice1712 index=1" but in the applet volume
Luca wrote:
Hi... again !
Well the configuration of OpenOffice took place but in the making it
ends up with:
./configure: line 24672:
/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/X11R7/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome-1.4/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome-2.14.2/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig
Hi... again !
Well the configuration of OpenOffice took place but in the making it
ends up with:
./configure: line 24672:
/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/X11R7/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome-1.4/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome-2.14.2/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/kde-3.5.4
Hi again!
Solved the problem with OpenOffice by passing all environment
settings like CFLAGS and LIBS and exporting PKG_CONFIG to configure
script, however I still have the other two problems I told.
N.B. In order for gcc configured with java language to work it's
necessary to pass &quo
Hi there!
I'm trying to compile OpenOffice-2.0.3 but the configure script
returns a lot of errors about missing libs, here is an example:
"checking for GTK... ./configure: line 22215:
/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/X11R7/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome-1.4/lib/pkgconfig:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Need a bit more info. What command line options did you pass?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/windows/openoffice/OOC680_m7$ ./bootstrap &&
>>> . LinuxIntelEnv.Set.sh &&
>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need a bit more info. What command line options did you pass?
Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/windows/openoffice/OOC680_m7$ ./bootstrap &&
. LinuxIntelEnv.Set.sh &&
dmake
No - on the configure command.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi
>> I'm truing to build OpenOffice i installed almost all the packages
>> required but i have this error:
>
> Need a bit more info. What command line options did you pass?
>
> Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/win
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
> I'm truing to build OpenOffice i installed almost all the packages required
> but i have this error:
Need a bit more info. What command line options did you pass?
Thanks.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-sup
Hi
I'm truing to build OpenOffice i installed almost all the packages required
but i have this error:
=
Building project canvas
=
/windows/openoffice/OOC680_m7/canvas/source/tools
dmake: Executing shell macro: $(FIND) . -name
"{$(subst,$($(WINVERSIONNAMES)_MAJOR)
I think I know what went wrong. I installed Firefox in
/usr/local/Firefox-1.5 and should have directed the configuration there.
Here is the configuration "script" I used:
./configure --prefix=/opt/openoffice-2.0.2 \
--enable-libsn \
--enable-libart \
--disable-mozilla \
Niko Sauer wrote:
> In compiling OpenOffice-2.0.2 according to BLFS, the process got stuck
> with the following message:
> ... plugcon.hxx ... cannot find npupp.h. I fixed this by running the
> following sed's immediatedly before issuing the dmake command:
>
> sed -i "
In compiling OpenOffice-2.0.2 according to BLFS, the process got stuck
with the following message:
... plugcon.hxx ... cannot find npupp.h. I fixed this by running the
following sed's immediatedly before issuing the dmake command:
sed -i "s@@<$SRC_ROOT/np_sdk/mozsrc/npupp.h>
Le Mon, 08 May 2006 19:05:48 -0400 "Martin McCourt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit :
> At first glance it looks as if you didn't but the beanshell tarball in the
> appropriate download directory. Go back and read over the instructions for
> this very carefully.
The beanshell download has been put
TED]>
To: blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Problem compiling OpenOffice : beanshell
Can someone provide me with some help on this subject ? I saw a few
messages about beanshell, and OO not compatible with JDK 1.5 on google,
but nothing that I could benefit from.
--
http://linuxfrom
When I try to compile OpenOffice 2.0.2 (LFS SVN, BLFS SVN), I get his
error :
=
Building project beanshell
=
/sources/OOB680_m5/beanshell
-
dmake: Error -- `./unxlngi6.pro/misc/bsh-2.0b4-src.unpack' not found,
and can't be made '---* tg_merge.
> /opt/gcc-4.0.3/bin/g++
The first command strikes
me as a little odd. Why is gcc in opt? Seems this install is not by
the book, so no telling what is different without reproducing it. What
is the system libc and gcc?
I think it's not a problem as everything i compiled works fine. I did
t
When I try compiling OpenOffice.org on newer computer with BLFS(actual
SVN version) with gcc4.0, to use with older LFS, then I have this error
if I wont start OpenOffice on older LFS:
---
no suitable windowing system found, exiting
>>Zalo<< wrote:
I found an error trying to compile OOo from sorce.
The configure script ends with no errors. The configure i used is:
./configure --prefix=/opt/openoffice-2.0.2 --enable-libart
--disable-fontooo --disable-gnome-vfs --without-fonts
--with-system-stdlibs -
I found an error trying to compile OOo from sorce.
The configure script ends with no errors. The configure i used is:
./configure --prefix=/opt/openoffice-2.0.2 --enable-libart
--disable-fontooo --disable-gnome-vfs --without-fonts
--with-system-stdlibs --with-system-freetype
--with
> Hi again,
>
> Well, I got *just* past "soltools/HIDCompiler" to "soltools/mkdepend" and
> here is what I'm getting (not a good sign!):
>
> In file included from /usr/include/_G_config.h:44,
> from /usr/include/libio.h:32,
> from /usr/include/stdio.h:72,
>
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 19:44, DJ Lucas wrote:
> Martin. Did you get passed this error yet?
>
> Thanks.
Hi again,
Well, I got *just* past "soltools/HIDCompiler" to "soltools/mkdepend" and
here is what I'm getting (not a good sign!):
In file included from /usr/include/_G_config.h:44,
> Martin. Did you get passed this error yet?
Hi DJ (I really appreciate your concern for this, btw),
Um, sort of. recompiling flex-2.5.4 seems to have done something, but I'm
not sure it's good at all . I'm getting a bunch of rubbish which looks
like
I've messed up my glibc or something. Wh
DJ Lucas wrote:
Martin McCourt wrote:
I've done a fair bit of Google'ing and discovered that something may
be wrong with my version of bison. I've tried recompiling 3 different
versions of Bison now (2.0, 2.1, and this was with 1.875) and I'm
still getting this same error. Any ideas?
Ju
Martin McCourt wrote:
I've done a fair bit of Google'ing and discovered that something may be wrong
with my version of bison. I've tried recompiling 3 different versions of
Bison now (2.0, 2.1, and this was with 1.875) and I'm still getting this same
error. Any ideas?
Just to be sure...y
Hi all,
Here's where I'm stuck:
=
Building project soltools
=
/sources/OOB680_m5/soltools/adjustvisibility
-
/sources/OOB680_m5/soltools/HIDCompiler
--
Making: ../unxlngi6.pro/obj/hidc_yy.obj
---snip---
*big long compiling instruction
Filip Bartmann wrote:
I try building OpenOffice.org with gcc 4.1, but I have this error:
-
Making: ../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libstore.so.3
g++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN'
"-Wl,-
I try building OpenOffice.org with gcc 4.1, but I have this error:
-
Making: ../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libstore.so.3
g++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN'
"-Wl,-hlibstore.so.3" -shared
DJ Lucas wrote:
Not quite enough info here, but I'll take a stab based on info you've
provided with previous posts.
I'm sorry about that long message, wrong Martin. If using the versions
as in the book now, I'd do an 'rm -r xmlhelp/unxlngi6.pro', rerun
configure with out the '--with-syste
DJ Lucas wrote:
Printing will still be broken,
Ooops, I did have that one in there..sorry bout that. All should be
well with printing too then.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See t
Martin McCourt wrote:
HelpLinker.java:68: error: Class or interface 'com.sleepycat.db.Dbt' not found
in import.
import com.sleepycat.db.Dbt;
^
Not quite enough info here, but I'll take a stab based on info you've
provided with previous posts. For future reference, please post bo
Hi all,
Got fairly far through the build to get to here, stuck on xmlhelp:
GCJFileURLStreamHandler.java:46: error: Public class
'com.sun.star.help.FileURLStreamHandler' must be defined in a file called
'FileURLStreamHandler.java'.
public class FileURLStreamHandler
^
HelpLinke
> ConnSvr.c:(.text+0xba9): undefined reference to « XauDisposeAuth »
> ConnSvr.c:(.text+0xd1b): undefined reference to « XauGetBestAuthByAddr »
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> dmake: Error code 1, while making
> '../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libvclplug_gen680li.so'
Two errors there. The second on
On 3/24/06, Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Making: ../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libvclplug_gen680li.so
> g++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN' -shared
> -L../unxlngi6.pro/lib -L../lib
../unxlngi6.pro/slo/nassound.o ../unxlngi6.pro/slo/pasfsound.o
-lvcl680li -lpsp680li -lsot680li -l
Hi,
I try to build OpenOffice.org 2.0.2RC3
when i compiling there comes the following error message by
making ../unxlngi6.pro/lib/ivcl.lib:
Making: ../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libvclplug_gen680li.so
g++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN' -shared
-L../unxlngi6.pro/lib -L../lib
-L/home/ni
Title: Saving Documents
I compiled openoffice 2.0.2 with sistem lfs. It seems runs, but i don't save documents in format oasis.
In File -> Save As, when i select a name and i click on save, dialog doesn't disappear and i can't save the document.In format *.doc i
I'm currently stuck in this place. Yes, I know that this gcc is not
supported. This is also the 2.0.1-sourceball. But can anybody
explain this error message for me? That would be great, thanks,
as I don't really have any clue how to tweak/trick/force
compilation past this point...
As far as I can
I have looked through all OpenOffice-threads I could find, but
none seem to have got stuck at exactly the same place as I,
so here goes:
gcc 3.4.4, x86_64 multilib system, most stuff is fairly
up to date, I'm trying to compile OO 2.0.0 following the
development BLFS.
I have added '
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:36:44 -0600
DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard A Downing wrote:
>
>
> > An editor, probably DJ Lucas, will assign this bug to himself
>
> Thanks for putting me on the spot Richard! :-)
I had the opposite intention. I would say, 'take your time and make it
Richard A Downing wrote:
An editor, probably DJ Lucas, will assign this bug to himself
Thanks for putting me on the spot Richard! :-) Actually, I was already
planning on first builds for tomorrow. I'm on dialup, so a 290MB source
tarball is a little difficult to acquire as busy as I've be
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:47:39 -0600
Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 01/19/06 11:40 CST:
> > On 1/19/06, Tor Olav Stava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Are there any plans to upgrade the SVN book to include this
> >>version? It supposedly contains a
Hello all,
I am trying to install OpenOffice-1.1.4 from chapter 34 and got an error
during the build. I followed all of the instructions including applying
the patches up to and including:
bash -c "source LinuxIntelEnv.Set.sh; dmake"
my only difference was adding the options --
DJ Lucas wrote these words on 12/18/05 19:32 CST:
> If firefox, did you remove the '--disable-ldap' configure flag and
> add '--enable-ldap' when building firefox? Also, I believe that there
> should be more above this error (at least I hope)...something to the
> effect of "in file included fr
Jean-Philippe Mengual wrote:
Hi,
A new error appeared while building OpenOffice, here's what is
displayed:
nentdef.cxx:37:
/root/OOo_2.0.0rc3_src/extensions/source/config/ldap/ldapaccess.hxx:161:
error:
ISO C++ forbids declaration of `LDAP' with no type
/root/OOo_2.0.0rc3_src/extensi
Hi,
A new error appeared while building OpenOffice, here's what is
displayed:
nentdef.cxx:37:
/root/OOo_2.0.0rc3_src/extensions/source/config/ldap/ldapaccess.hxx:161:
error:
ISO C++ forbids declaration of `LDAP' with no type
/root/OOo_2.0.0rc3_src/extensions/source/config/ldap/ldapacce
Jean-Philippe Mengual wrote:
Oops, I forgot, I've the same questions for firefox, I installed it
but for the French release, should I install another package or is
there a way to change it into French when it's installed?
Thanks very much
Have you tried this build of Firefox
http://ftp.mozilla
nks very much
> Regards
> JP
OpenOffice I don't know, but for firefox one way is to install locale-switcher
http://benjamin.smedbergs.us/switch-locales/
and french language pack
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla1.8-1.5-l10n/linux-xpi/
Maybe there are ea
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
