All I see in the articles are allegations. I don't see any proof that
anyone did anything.
It's up to a court of law to determine that, should either party decide
to take it there.
Unless or until there is evidence, the projects need to stay pretty neutral.
... and this is likely not the righ
On 12/2/09, esub wrote:
> The school superintendant should be arrested for lying about the cost of
> removal of SETI..
Who said that was for the removal? News sites say it was for "damages,
energy usage and equipment losses". Remember he stole computers too
(some school machines were found at his
I think it's appropriate to say that I am not an employee of U.C.
Berkeley, or the projects, and my opinions do not represent the Regents
of the University of California or anyone else.
It's clear from the articles that at least one writer has been reading
the forums at s...@home, reading the i
Lynn, I don't see in what way politics are involved. One of the projects has
to decide how to deal with this dishonest member (if the press reports turn
out to be correct) just as several projects had to when the Wate affair was
discovered. Wate had also commandeered over 5000 computers though in a
This is politics, not software development.
William wrote:
> Isn't BOINC supposed to always run everything at the lowest possible
> priority? Shouldn't that prevent BOINC from ever "bogging down" or otherwise
> "interfering with" the computers it runs on?
> ---
> http://www.msnbc.ms
The school superintendant should be arrested for lying about the cost of
removal of SETI..
-Original Message-
From: boinc_dev-boun...@ssl.berkeley.edu
[mailto:boinc_dev-boun...@ssl.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of William
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 5:09 PM
To: boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
IIRC, the 100 core processor didn't support the x86 instruction set, this new
processor does. That in just two years.
I wonder what things will be like in two more years.
- Rom
-Original Message-
From: boinc_dev-boun...@ssl.berkeley.edu
[mailto:boinc_dev-boun...@ssl.berkeley.edu]
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Martin wrote:
> Looks more like a catch-up attempt to chase Tilera:
>
> http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/10/tilera-100-cores/
>
>
> It does suggest that Boinc will need to develop to support massive
> parallelisation of the science applications on individual hos
Interesting start but not too useful at this point:
>> The cores themselves aren't terribly powerful--more like lower-end Atom
processors
Unless running a lot of processes really slowly is attractive.
Really nice for projects that require quick turn around :-)
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Ro
Tavis Curry wrote:
> M...hawt and hot!
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Rom Walton wrote:
>
>> Article:
>>
>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10407818-264.html?tag=newsLatestHeadli
>> nesArea.0
>>
>>
>>
>> I wonder how busy BOINC can keep that.
Non-broken link:
http://news.cnet.com/83
M...hawt and hot!
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Rom Walton wrote:
> Article:
>
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10407818-264.html?tag=newsLatestHeadli
> nesArea.0
>
>
>
> I wonder how busy BOINC can keep that.
>
>
>
> - Rom
>
> ___
> boinc
Article:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-10407818-264.html?tag=newsLatestHeadli
nesArea.0
I wonder how busy BOINC can keep that.
- Rom
___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boi
Nothing like a big juicy lie to make it a news story...
It just never ends.
>
> Birdwell said it will take more than $1 million to fix the problem,
> including removal of the SETI software. She says police are conducting a
> broader investigation.
>
> Niesluchowski resigned from the district Oct.
On 12/2/09, William wrote:
> Isn't BOINC supposed to always run everything at the lowest possible
> priority? Shouldn't that prevent BOINC from ever "bogging down" or
> otherwise "interfering with" the computers it runs on?
The owner of the computer is who decides if it's interferring or not.
Th
Isn't BOINC supposed to always run everything at the lowest possible priority?
Shouldn't that prevent BOINC from ever "bogging down" or otherwise "interfering
with" the computers it runs on?
---
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34241415/ns/technology_and_science-science/
Search for alien
On Einstein we have had a mini-debate about the transition of the CUDA
application mostly because of the heavy use of the CPU along with the GPU
meaning that throughput is going to suffer. Many of us would have wished to
opt out of running these tasks but were caught by the surprise of the
mig
16 matches
Mail list logo
