> I don't know, but I'm sure that your problem is not related to Hurd.
Ok, thanks.
--
Neal H Walfield
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Bug-grub mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailma
From: Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Bug-grub] Grub does not compile on the hurd
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 19:36:12 -0500
> same options to both. Either way, can you get grub to compile on the
> hurd?
I don't know, but I'm sure that your problem is not r
> The answer is no, but I'm not talking about autoconf but about
> automake. As for automake, you need to use a certain version hacked by
> me, since the CVS version is too buggy (my version is also buggy,
> though).
Either way, they are still both the same versions. I passed the exact
same op
From: Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Bug-grub] Grub does not compile on the hurd
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 10:36:26 -0500
> I ran 2.13 on both the hurd and the linux box (both are debian systems).
> Do one still need to apply the patch to autoconf?
The answer is
> Your Makefile seems to be quite broken. Didn't you run (an invalid
> version of) automake yourself?
I ran 2.13 on both the hurd and the linux box (both are debian systems).
Do one still need to apply the patch to autoconf?
Thanks,
-Neal
--
Neal H Walfield
University of Massachusetts at Low
From: Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Bug-grub] Grub does not compile on the hurd
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 10:01:54 -0500
> Trying to compile on the hurd yielded some error messages during the build.
> I was using the CVS version which compiles fine under GNU/Linux.
Hi,
Trying to compile on the hurd yielded some error messages during the build.
I was using the CVS version which compiles fine under GNU/Linux.
I have included a snipped output of make. I can send the whole file if
needed.
-Neal
--
Neal H Walfield
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
[EMAI
