Re: GRUB Vs LILO

2001-09-26 Thread dman
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 02:01:18PM -0700, Andrew Burgess wrote: | I have a small problem with my linux that has something to do with | the CPU serial number. I've never heard of this before. Could someone provide a pointer to a more detailed explanation? Thanks, -D _

Re: GRUB Vs LILO

2001-09-25 Thread Christoph Plattner
GRUB fully supports kernel line paramters. The line then is kernel //vmlinuz x86_serial_nr=1 You can load the kernel manually by typing this, or simple add the parameters in the "kernel" line in `menu.lst'. In lilo `appand="xxx"' is used to pass further command lines. Advantage o

GRUB Vs LILO

2001-09-25 Thread Andrew Burgess
I have a small problem with my linux that has something to do with the CPU serial number. with lilo all I had to do was enter "linux x86_serial_nr=1" at boot. What is the equivalent in GRUB? Thanks. Regards Andrew Burgess Coordinator, Department of Computer & Communications Services Maxwell Inte

Re: grub vs lilo

2001-02-03 Thread Kuno Woudt
Goran Koruga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have hacked grub back in 0.4 days with something like this. I only press > the number corresponding to the boot entyr I wish to boot et voila. The > patch is rather trivial, however I don't know if it works if there are more > than 10 entries in your m

Re: grub vs lilo

2001-02-03 Thread Kuno Woudt
Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This kind of "feature" can be implemented simply with the existing tools, > that is with the `cat' command combined with a `pause'. The only limit is > the size of the message, because we don't have a `more' command yet (and > that's my job since I ha

Re: grub vs lilo

2001-02-01 Thread Goran Koruga
On Wed, Jan 31 2001, Kuno Woudt wrote: Hiya, > Dave Cinege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I completly disagree. Grub's conf file is simple and initutive and I've never > > seen any type of boot menu for lilo. (No I don't mean holding the > > tab key.) > The boot menu for grub is nice for new

Re: grub vs lilo

2001-02-01 Thread Steve
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Dave Cinege wrote: > Kuno Woudt wrote: > > > > Dave Cinege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I completly disagree. Grub's conf file is simple and initutive and I've never > > > seen any type of boot menu for lilo. (No I don't mean holding the > > > tab key.) > > The boot m

Re: grub vs lilo

2001-02-01 Thread Kuno Woudt
Dave Cinege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I completly disagree. Grub's conf file is simple and initutive and I've never > seen any type of boot menu for lilo. (No I don't mean holding the > tab key.) The boot menu for grub is nice for new users, but rather annoying if you reboot a lot - selecting

Re: grub vs lilo

2001-02-01 Thread Thierry Laronde
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:10:21PM +0100, Kuno Woudt wrote: > > Something else which I'd really like to see is something similar to > LILO's "message" option. This kind of "feature" can be implemented simply with the existing tools, that is with the `cat' command combined with a `pause'. The onl

Re: grub vs lilo

2001-02-01 Thread Dave Cinege
Kuno Woudt wrote: > > Dave Cinege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I completly disagree. Grub's conf file is simple and initutive and I've never > > seen any type of boot menu for lilo. (No I don't mean holding the > > tab key.) > The boot menu for grub is nice for new users, but rather annoyin

Re: grub vs lilo

2001-01-29 Thread Shaun Savage
Steve wrote: > > > but for non-users users lilo is > > simpler and looks better. >I completly disagree. Grub's conf file is simple and initutive and I've never >seen any type of boot menu for lilo. (No I don't mean holding the >tab key.) See RedHat 7.0 (broken, not beta). The lilo there has a

Re: grub vs lilo

2001-01-29 Thread Dave Cinege
Steve wrote: > > > but for non-users users lilo is > > simpler and looks better. I completly disagree. Grub's conf file is simple and initutive and I've never seen any type of boot menu for lilo. (No I don't mean holding the tab key.) IMO using anything other then GRUB or Syslinux(for floppies)

Re: grub vs lilo

2001-01-28 Thread Steve
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Shaun Savage wrote: > HI > > I am not an expert BUT I will try to answer your question with what I > have found. > > The big difference is LILO uses a sector map while grub uses filesystem > access. This means that grub is self configuring. Every time you make > changes to

grub vs lilo

2001-01-28 Thread Shaun Savage
HI I am not an expert BUT I will try to answer your question with what I have found. The big difference is LILO uses a sector map while grub uses filesystem access. This means that grub is self configuring. Every time you make changes to lilo you have to run the command 'lilo', grub does it a

grub vs lilo

2001-01-27 Thread Steve
Hello, I asked this question before and didn't receive any response. Can the learned folks here provide me with a comparison between the two? -- Steve ___ Bug-grub mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub