On 12/05/13 21:50, Tim Rühsen wrote:
> A real solution would be a rewrite of the init stuff (I saw that already
> somewhere on the Wget 2.0 wish list or somewhere - don't remeber exactly).
>
> I already wrote this kind of code and would contribute it to Wget.
> But i am unshure how to apply it to
Am Sonntag, 12. Mai 2013 schrieb Giuseppe Scrivano:
> Tim Rühsen writes:
>
> > having an abort() without a message is simply a big waste of time for any
> > developer who stumbles upon it.
>
> I disagree here, what is so difficult that a debugger cannot catch? On
> the other hand, I agree this
Hi,
Tim Rühsen writes:
> I replaced some hand-written string code by standard library functions.
> In any case these functions may be found in gnulib as well.
> From d540fd5dbd3644936a8ad1a384516abba10de268 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tim Ruehsen
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 19:53:36 +0200
> S
Tim Rühsen writes:
> having an abort() without a message is simply a big waste of time for any
> developer who stumbles upon it.
I disagree here, what is so difficult that a debugger cannot catch? On
the other hand, I agree this can be improved.
> Since the init code of Wget has to be rewri
Darshit Shah writes:
> Agreed!
> The documentation should indeed read: Number of tries since that is what is
> being set by the option.
>
> Attached a patch with the required change.
> +2013-05-10 Darshit Shah (tiny change)
> +
> + * wget.text (No of tries): Fix typo to make it clear that
Hello,
Dmitry Bogatov writes:
> -request_set_method (req, meth, meth_arg);
> +req = request_new(meth, meth_arg);
I have amended this change:
> +req = request_new (meth, meth_arg);
and I am going to push it.
Thanks for your contribution!
Giuseppe
