Re: RFR: 8298808: Check `script` code on detecting the base locales [v2]

2022-12-14 Thread Naoto Sato
> Fixing `CLDRConverter` build tool to not regard [new > locales](https://github.com/unicode-org/cldr/pull/2508/files#diff-94cbefde02914335da884f768063a06a84ad651ee4e56cdb1cb90625d7776731) > introduced in CLDR 43 as one of the base locales. Otherwise they would > incorrectly go into `java.base`

RFR: 8298808: Check `script` code on detecting the base locales

2022-12-14 Thread Naoto Sato
Fixing `CLDRConverter` build tool to not regard [new locales](https://github.com/unicode-org/cldr/pull/2508/files#diff-94cbefde02914335da884f768063a06a84ad651ee4e56cdb1cb90625d7776731) introduced in CLDR 43 as one of the base locales. Otherwise they would incorrectly go into `java.base` module,

Integrated: Merge jdk20

2022-12-14 Thread Jesper Wilhelmsson
On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:59:54 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson wrote: > Forwardport JDK 20 -> JDK 21 This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: a130c8a6 Author:Jesper Wilhelmsson URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/a130c8a6688fcdda92e0f6295ec06f1591382328 Stats: 216 lines

RFR: Merge jdk20

2022-12-14 Thread Jesper Wilhelmsson
Forwardport JDK 20 -> JDK 21 - Commit messages: - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk20/master' into Merge_jdk20 - 8297235: ZGC: assert(regs[i] != regs[j]) failed: Multiple uses of register: rax - 8298649: JFR: RemoteRecordingStream support for checkpoint event sizes beyond u4 - 8

Re: RFR: 8296478: Rework 8282948 and 8282700 to use the new autoconf UTIL_ARG_WITH [v15]

2022-12-14 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:47:29 GMT, Julian Waters wrote: >> 8285093 introduced the new UTIL_ARG_WITH definition, which was not available >> when both 8282948 and 8282700 were written. They can now be moved to using >> the cleaner logic that UTIL_ARG_WITH grants. >> >> There are many more options

Re: RFR: 8296478: Rework 8282948 and 8282700 to use the new autoconf UTIL_ARG_WITH [v15]

2022-12-14 Thread Julian Waters
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:47:29 GMT, Julian Waters wrote: >> 8285093 introduced the new UTIL_ARG_WITH definition, which was not available >> when both 8282948 and 8282700 were written. They can now be moved to using >> the cleaner logic that UTIL_ARG_WITH grants. >> >> There are many more options