On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 16:44:28 GMT, Markus Grönlund wrote:
>> A question about "level". Is the intention that the value can be anything,
>> e.g. some new event next month might use the values "1", "2, "3"? Just
>> asking because ordinarily depr
> Greetings,
>
> please help review this enhancement to add a JFR event to report runtime
> invocations of methods that have been declared deprecated in the JDK.
>
> Testing: jdk_jfr, CI 1-6, stress testing
>
> Thanks
> Markus
Markus Grönlund has updated the pull
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 16:33:48 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> A question about "level". Is the intention that the value can be anything,
> e.g. some new event next month might use the values "1", "2, "3"? Just asking
> because ordinarily deprecated vs. terminally deprecated is very specific to
> the
> Greetings,
>
> please help review this enhancement to add a JFR event to report runtime
> invocations of methods that have been declared deprecated in the JDK.
>
> Testing: jdk_jfr, CI 1-6, stress testing
>
> Thanks
> Markus
Markus Grönlund has updated the pull
> Greetings,
>
> please help review this enhancement to add a JFR event to report runtime
> invocations of methods that have been declared deprecated in the JDK.
>
> Testing: jdk_jfr, CI 1-6, stress testing
>
> Thanks
> Markus
Markus Grönlund has updated the pull
> Greetings,
>
> please help review this enhancement to add a JFR event to report runtime
> invocations of methods that have been declared deprecated in the JDK.
>
> Testing: jdk_jfr, CI 1-6, stress testing
>
> Thanks
> Markus
Markus Grönlund has updated the pull
> Greetings,
>
> please help review this enhancement to add a JFR event to report runtime
> invocations of methods that have been declared deprecated in the JDK.
>
> Testing: jdk_jfr, CI 1-6, stress testing
>
> Thanks
> Markus
Markus Grönlund has updated the pull
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 10:15:41 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Markus Grönlund has updated the pull request incrementally with two
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Merge branch '8211238' of github.com:mgronlun/jdk into 8211238
>> -
> Greetings,
>
> please help review this enhancement to add a JFR event to report runtime
> invocations of methods that have been declared deprecated in the JDK.
>
> Testing: jdk_jfr, CI 1-6, stress testing
>
> Thanks
> Markus
Markus Grönlund has updated the pull
> Greetings,
>
> please help review this enhancement to add a JFR event to report runtime
> invocations of methods that have been declared deprecated in the JDK.
>
> Testing: jdk_jfr, CI 1-6, stress testing
>
> Thanks
> Markus
Markus Grönlund has updated the pull
> Greetings,
>
> please help review this enhancement to add a JFR event to report runtime
> invocations of methods that have been declared deprecated in the JDK.
>
> Testing: jdk_jfr, CI 1-6, stress testing
>
> Thanks
> Markus
Markus Grönlund has updated the pull
Greetings,
please help review this enhancement to add a JFR event to report runtime
invocations of methods that have been declared deprecated in the JDK.
Testing: jdk_jfr, CI 1-6, stress testing
Thanks
Markus
-
Commit messages:
- Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into 8211238
- whit
On Thu, 25 May 2023 10:34:45 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Could I have a review of an enhancement that adds a view command to jfr.
>>
>> Testing: tier1, tier2 + jdk/jdk/jfr
>>
>> For the change to work properly when streaming, fix of 8307738 needs to be
>> applied.
>>
>> To simplify the review,
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 18:56:20 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could I have a review of an enhancement that adds the option
>> preserve-repository=true/false to -XX:FlightRecorderOptions and jcmd
>> JFR.configure. When set to true, chunk files in the repository will not be
>> removed by th
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 13:50:14 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Could I have a review of a PR that adds missing copyright header to
>> GenerateJfrFiles.java
>>
>> Testing: tier1
>>
>> Thanks
>> Erik
>
> Erik Gahlin has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 07:07:13 GMT, Erik Gahlin wrote:
>> Could I have review of infrastructure that makes it easier to write periodic
>> events with the same timestamp.
>>
>> Testing: jdk/jdk/jfr + tier1 + tier2
>>
>> Thanks
>> Erik
>
> Erik Gahlin has updated the pull request incrementally with
16 matches
Mail list logo
