Re: RFR: 8295231: Move all linking of native libraries to make [v6]

2022-10-17 Thread Alexey Semenyuk
On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:37:11 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote: > I believe this is part of the effort for > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8288293. Agree. I'd prefer to have a different description of the bug though to make it clear that this is necessary for decoupling a compiler and an OS. ---

Re: RFR: 8295231: Move all linking of native libraries to make [v6]

2022-10-17 Thread Erik Joelsson
On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:16:21 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote: > The change looks harmless. Howevere I don't understand how searching for the > standard Windows libs can then become frustrating. I believe this is part of the effort for https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8288293. - PR:

Re: RFR: 8295231: Move all linking of native libraries to make [v6]

2022-10-17 Thread Erik Joelsson
On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:41:06 GMT, Julian Waters wrote: >> Some external libraries required by native code are linked via linker >> comments embedded in pragmas. Searching for which libraries are linked can >> then become frustrating and confusing since they may be included in an >> obscure pla

Re: RFR: 8295231: Move all linking of native libraries to make [v6]

2022-10-17 Thread Alexey Semenyuk
On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:41:06 GMT, Julian Waters wrote: >> Some external libraries required by native code are linked via linker >> comments embedded in pragmas. Searching for which libraries are linked can >> then become frustrating and confusing since they may be included in an >> obscure pla

Re: RFR: 8295231: Move all linking of native libraries to make [v6]

2022-10-17 Thread Julian Waters
> Some external libraries required by native code are linked via linker > comments embedded in pragmas. Searching for which libraries are linked can > then become frustrating and confusing since they may be included in an > obscure place, and for all relevant compilers there is no difference bet