On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:58:17 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Inspired by (the later backed-out)
>> [JDK-8296115](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296115), I propose to
>> enable `-Wpedantic` for clang. This has already found some irregularities in
>> the code, like mistakenly using `#impo
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:58:17 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Inspired by (the later backed-out)
>> [JDK-8296115](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296115), I propose to
>> enable `-Wpedantic` for clang. This has already found some irregularities in
>> the code, like mistakenly using `#impo
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:58:17 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Inspired by (the later backed-out)
>> [JDK-8296115](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296115), I propose to
>> enable `-Wpedantic` for clang. This has already found some irregularities in
>> the code, like mistakenly using `#impo
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 21:39:06 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Here is the full list:
> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/DiagnosticsReference.html#wpedantic
I know about that list, and that's not what I was asking for. I want to
understand the impact on *our* code. What warnings are arising from *our*
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:58:17 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Inspired by (the later backed-out)
>> [JDK-8296115](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296115), I propose to
>> enable `-Wpedantic` for clang. This has already found some irregularities in
>> the code, like mistakenly using `#impo
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:19:59 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> Is there anything in this proposed PR that you gentlemen disagree with or
> object to? Or is this fine to push as a step in our ongoing pursuit of
> increasing the code quality, that can (and will) be followed by many more?
Yes. As
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:58:17 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Inspired by (the later backed-out)
>> [JDK-8296115](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296115), I propose to
>> enable `-Wpedantic` for clang. This has already found some irregularities in
>> the code, like mistakenly using `#impo
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:58:17 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Inspired by (the later backed-out)
>> [JDK-8296115](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296115), I propose to
>> enable `-Wpedantic` for clang. This has already found some irregularities in
>> the code, like mistakenly using `#impo
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:58:17 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Inspired by (the later backed-out)
>> [JDK-8296115](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296115), I propose to
>> enable `-Wpedantic` for clang. This has already found some irregularities in
>> the code, like mistakenly using `#impo
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:58:17 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Inspired by (the later backed-out)
>> [JDK-8296115](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296115), I propose to
>> enable `-Wpedantic` for clang. This has already found some irregularities in
>> the code, like mistakenly using `#impo
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:58:17 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Inspired by (the later backed-out)
>> [JDK-8296115](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296115), I propose to
>> enable `-Wpedantic` for clang. This has already found some irregularities in
>> the code, like mistakenly using `#impo
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:58:17 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Inspired by (the later backed-out)
>> [JDK-8296115](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296115), I propose to
>> enable `-Wpedantic` for clang. This has already found some irregularities in
>> the code, like mistakenly using `#impo
> Inspired by (the later backed-out)
> [JDK-8296115](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8296115), I propose to
> enable `-Wpedantic` for clang. This has already found some irregularities in
> the code, like mistakenly using `#import` instead of `#include`. In this
> patch, I disable warnings f
13 matches
Mail list logo
