On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 10:39:35 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> This is a follow-up on
>> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
>> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
>> here, so there is some additional effects outside
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 10:39:35 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> This is a follow-up on
>> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
>> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
>> here, so there is some additional effects outside
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 23:38:07 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> The code, prior to this PR, includes these lines:
>>
>> # The fast floor code loses precision.
>> LCMS_CFLAGS=-DCMS_DONT_USE_FAST_FLOOR -DCMS_NO_HALF_SUPPORT
>>
>>
>> This will overwrite the value of `LCMS_CFLAGS` as given in `spec
> This is a follow-up on
> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
> here, so there is some additional effects outside of the modules/java.desktop
> directory. The code was also in wor
> This is a follow-up on
> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
> here, so there is some additional effects outside of the modules/java.desktop
> directory. The code was also in wor
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 23:10:44 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> This took me a while to decode. The old code will unconditionally override
>> `LCMS_CFLAGS` which means whatever value it gets in configure is
>> overwritten. That certainly seems like a bug.
>>
>> Your current patch clears the var
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:01:33 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> This is a follow-up on
>> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
>> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
>> here, so there is some additional effects outside of th
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:36:04 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> make/modules/java.desktop/lib/Awt2dLibraries.gmk line 280:
>>
>>> 278: # as includes, instead the system headers should be used.
>>> 279: LIBLCMS_HEADERS_FROM_SRC := false
>>> 280: # FIXME: Keep old behavior and reset LCMS_CFLAGS. This
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:19:14 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> This is a follow-up on
>> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
>> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
>> here, so there is some additional effects outside of the
>
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:51:38 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> This is a follow-up on
> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
> here, so there is some additional effects outside of t
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:36:04 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> make/modules/java.desktop/lib/Awt2dLibraries.gmk line 280:
>>
>>> 278: # as includes, instead the system headers should be used.
>>> 279: LIBLCMS_HEADERS_FROM_SRC := false
>>> 280: # FIXME: Keep old behavior and reset LCMS_CFLAGS. This
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:46:00 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> This is a follow-up on
>> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
>> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
>> here, so there is some additional effects outside of the
>
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 23:01:55 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> make/modules/java.desktop/lib/Awt2dLibraries.gmk line 145:
>>
>>> 143: -delayload:gdi32.dll -delayload:imm32.dll -delayload:ole32.dll
>>> \
>>> 144: -delayload:shell32.dll -delayload:shlwapi.dll
>>> -delayload:user3
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:25:47 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> This is a follow-up on
>> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
>> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
>> here, so there is some additional effects outside of the
>
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:19:14 GMT, Phil Race wrote:
>> This is a follow-up on
>> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
>> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
>> here, so there is some additional effects outside of the
>
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:00:41 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> This is a follow-up on
>> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
>> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
>> here, so there is some additional effects outside
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:51:38 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> This is a follow-up on
> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
> here, so there is some additional effects outside of t
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:51:38 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> This is a follow-up on
> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
> here, so there is some additional effects outside of t
This is a follow-up on
[JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment here,
so there is some additional effects outside of the modules/java.desktop
directory. The code was also in worse shape t
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 12:51:38 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> This is a follow-up on
> [JDK-8328680](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8328680), making the same
> kind of cleanup to java.desktop. Some code needed more special treatment
> here, so there is some additional effects outside of t
20 matches
Mail list logo
