If you have a custom login screen, then you'll want to compare it against
the stock/default one. There were some minor changes to better support the
Login Token.
I think you may be spot on by thinking there is a new hidden field.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Tim McLaughlin wrote:
> Another
Another possibility: is the login form different? (new hidden field
requirements, etc.) We haven't changed the form from 3.4.8, either --
we're using a locally-developed template that we've used since moving to
CAS 3, maybe with some mods when we moved from 3.2 to the 3.4 series.
Tim
On 2012/02
On 2012/02/22 2:10 PM, "Marvin Addison" wrote:
>> Are there any big things I should be looking at in my configuration that
>> may have changed between 3.4.8 and 3.4.9+?
>
>Nothing big, but there were some minor changes that might be relevant.
>
>> I can include my deployerConfigContext.xml if n
> Are there any big things I should be looking at in my configuration that
> may have changed between 3.4.8 and 3.4.9+?
Nothing big, but there were some minor changes that might be relevant.
> I can include my deployerConfigContext.xml if needed.
Please post that and any relevant log entries fro
Hello,
I'm trying to make the leap from CAS 3.4.8 to 3.4.11, using the Maven
overlay method (we have a few local things).
When we moved from 3.4.7 to 3.4.8 LDAP authentication continued to work
just fine. However, when I go to 3.4.9+, trying to authenticate doesn't
do anything -- it just ends up
Hi guys.
I'm using cas-server 3.3.5 and cas-server-support-ldap-pwd-expiration 3.3.5.
Everything works fine, except one condition. In a sequence of login, logout and
login, I could see an additional (and I think this is incorrect) service
ticket. Does anybody know why this is happening?
FIRST
@all,
please turn of your auto responders for mailinglist.
Check your procmail configuration or ask you administrator for
the configuration of your mail system.
It's rather annoying to receive 6 mails if I want to respond to a message,
and it's not very polite for users that want to help other us
On Feb 22, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Stephen More wrote:
> Is anyone currently using CAS to protect AJAX pages written in primefaces ?
> For session timeouts when using non-ajax pages everything redirects
> back to login page as designed.
>
> When a session timeout occurs on an ajax page, a partial pag
Is anyone currently using CAS to protect AJAX pages written in primefaces ?
For session timeouts when using non-ajax pages everything redirects
back to login page as designed.
When a session timeout occurs on an ajax page, a partial page update
is requested, but the user is never redirected back t
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Matt Smith wrote:
> Milt,
> Could you send the config.log that should have been generated from
> the "./configure" process, and the output of the "make" and "make
> install" processes?
>
> By "yet to be released", do you mean you checked out the "master"
> branch at GitHub? O
Milt,
Could you send the config.log that should have been generated from the
"./configure" process, and the output of the "make" and "make install"
processes?
By "yet to be released", do you mean you checked out the "master" branch at
GitHub? Or did you retrieve the code elsewhere?
-Matt
On Feb 2
11 matches
Mail list logo
