Nice call Ryan. I think that¹s it.
Pete- post your config if this does not fix it.
Thanks.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Join our free online support and peer group
The Thank you for calling message is the "welcome prompt".
After this the B-ACD script is hardcoded to play the b"acd menu options"
prompt. Is this on the flash?
Is the queue tcl script ok? Look at the max # of hunt groups- does it match
the number of "aa-hunt" options you have? If in doubt- post
You can try doing this, but I'm not 100% convinced it'll fix it.
P34-BR2-RTR(config)#voice service voip
P34-BR2-RTR(conf-voi-serv)#h323
P34-BR2-RTR(conf-serv-h323)#call service stop forced
P34-BR2-RTR(conf-serv-h323)#no call service stop
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890, CCSI #31584
Senior Technical I
Anyone get this bug in the lab for RDNIS while in SRST.
*CSCsb11565*
I can not seem to get RDNIS to work when a PSTN call comes in. IP phone to
IP Phone while in SRST works great, but not from the PSTN.
Do you have a ephone-dn assigned to a park slot?
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Olson, Pete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it is in the connected state when the park is grayed out.
>
>
> *Pete Olson*
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 425-965-2577
>
>
> --
> *From:* Vik Malhi
I have a BACD script on the CME router. Calls from the CME phones to
the BACD script work fine. Calls from the PSTN immediately fail after
the welcome message "Thank you for calling". What would cause this ?
What debugs should I run ?
Any suggestions or ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Thx,
Thanks Scott.ugh...man ...removing them that way is a pain.
Mike Brooks
CCIE# 16027 (R&S)
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Hardesty, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is the only way that I know of.
>
>
>
> Scott Hardesty | Cisco Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked Solutions
> 7
It appears that the only way to remove the E164 registrations on the
gatekeeper is by using the "no-reg" command on each of the CMEs
numbers (ie. number 3001 no-reg) and then reloading.
Is this true ? If not, does anyone know of a better/easier method ?
Thx,
Mike Brooks
CCIE# 16027 (R&S)
Are you using Regions and locations based CAC between hq and br1? Since
the call is hitting HQ as g711 you need to make sure that HQ can talk to
BR1 using g711 or ensure that a xcoder is available to transcode to
g729.
Scott Hardesty | Cisco Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked Solu
The other important difference between a GDM owner and member is that
the owner does NOT have the option to press "9" to retrieve the message.
Only members have access to the GDM. I do not believe that the owner
has rights to individual member mailboxes. They are owners of the GDM
mailbox and hav
When making 4 digit calls from CME to CCM. Calls to HQ (1003, 1001)
work, but calls to BR1 (2001, 2003) fail. What extra is needed for calls
to BR1? Since they are registered with CCM, I wouldn't think anything
else would be needed.
The flow is CME (G729, SIP, RTP-NSE) to HQ-RTR to CCM (h323, G711
Yes, it is in the connected state when the park is grayed out.
Pete Olson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
425-965-2577
From: Vik Malhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 11:24 AM
To: Olson, Pete; Jacob Owen
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
S
The call is using G729 and doesn't use MTP/Transcoder.
Default gateway's set properly.
The strange thing is after 'hold' and 'resume' softkey only on HQ phone,
the call is fine with two way voice.
I checked the CME router interface if the voice packet is coming in from
HQ and the interface coun
You can ³pickup² the parked call or you have to add the softkey to the
template and access the parked call that way.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Join our free online support and
I would check the schedule has been assigned properly to the AA.
Then I would make sure that you are not calling the AA out of hours...how do
you modify the time?
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: [EMAI
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Understanding of points...looking for opinionsThis
particular example can make a sense - you may trust marking on the device port,
and then re-mark traffic with another DSCP based on "trusted DSCP/COS" values.
However it you get question like this in the real lab - it's be
Vik,
When a call is placed on park and a park number is displayed can you go
to another CME phone and just dial the park number to resume the call or
hit the pickup button then dial the park number.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Park is only applicable when you have an active call- make sure you are in
the connected state before attempting to ³park². What state is the phone in
when you see ³park² grayed out?
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454
I don¹t think it would cost you- butdon¹t configure if not asked. Why?
9911 might interfere with other Route Patterns for example the local RP
especially if the urgent priority checkbox is marked.
It probably won¹t, but it could bite you- so only configure what is being
asked. Lose ³rules of t
Did you find anything more on this?
I think the owner can record greetings for the GDM (standard and alternate)
and can change membership- but I must admit that I have never tried. I don¹t
have a CUE ready to go test, but the next time I do I will check.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technic
Have you looked at the ³Getting Started with Scripts² document here?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/custcosw/ps1846/products_programming_
reference_guides_list.html
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
M
Thanks for reporting back on this...I unlike you am glad it is the Vmware
kit:-)
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www
Difficult and weird one.
Is the call going through an MTP/Transcoder?
I would check your DHCP scope for the HQ phones- is the default gateway set
correctly? If the call passes through an MTP/Xcoder- is the default gw there
set correctly?
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - I
Our backbone is a 2811 cisco router. It changes the "0xFF" to something that
is valid since the "0xFF" is invalid. Even though the BR1 gateway sends
0xFF, the 6608 receives something else due to the modification in the PSTN
cloud.
This explains the difference in results we are having.
As to what
The evil dialplan pattern in effect avoids the need for the angelic voice
translation profiles. That is the benefit.
You will have to be ingenious at configuring voice translation-profiles in
your lab. So where is the benefit of dialplan pattern?
In answer to your question directly- dialplan patt
What results do you get for this scenario?
My code on BR1 is 12.4.3j. It could do with a test on 12.4.5b.
Backbone is ISDN simulators.
I use debug isdn q931 on both ends to make sure what's coming out is
the same as what goes in.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Vik Malhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
I have a strange problem. The call between HQ and CME using GK is
established but found that only HQ phone can hear the voice.
CME phone cannot hear the voice. But, I can hear voice on CME phone only
after I press "Hold" and "Resume" softkey on HQ phone.
I rebooted the CCM server but didn't fix i
I don¹t think you will see a lab where you get one question nullify another
question. In training material you might see this but grading this would be
a problem.
In your example, it doesn¹t make sense to trust markings then override them.
However IF you did see a question like the one you mention
You are getting different results to me- I'm guessing its a slightly
different IOS version OR the your backbone router is different. Can you
comment on these two things?
In any case, your solution seems good. You could even use Alternate
Extensions in Unity...
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior T
IN AAR the redirecting number is good. 0x82 not 0xFF.
The FF seems to cause issues inside CCM when in SRST. You are correct
it does not make CCM fall over but it seems to have more effect than
CCM just ignoring the IE for this particular call. It looks like it
might cause some kind of overflow
As I begin my studying, one question comes up for me in the following scenario:
If I am posed with a question that a later question may nullify some of the
config, do I still have to do that partial config?
An example from studying would be this. If I am asked in QoS to trust DSCP
from a
I think you hit the nail on the head. I guess you could FTP it direct from
Unity too. I¹m also thinking you could use the Greetings Management DN on
CUE.
--
Vik Malhi CCIE #13890
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECT
By sending the RDNIS out - which is needed for AAR but not for SRST given
the workaround- should not trash CCM.
An incorrectly built RDNIS (as is the case in SRST mode) should not effect
call processing in CallManager.
Are you seeing problems when in SRST mode you are sending the RDNIS?
--
Vik M
Scenario is testing redirection to unity
BR1 is H323 GW.
I am aware of the 'FF' problem and the well know workarounds. However
with H323 AAR and SRST there is an issue with the currently well know
workarounds. None of them provides a working solution for both AAR and
SRST WHEN GW is H323.
2 test
Hi,
What is the quickest and easiest way of re-recording prompts for B-ACD etc.
I currently use Unity, record a greeting on a new subscriber, save it to
desktop, move it to the tftp directory on CCM and then copy back into my
router!
Surely there's any easier method??
Thanks,
Rob
And what about the gateways? do they have configured the location?
If the location you are working with is applied to ephone 3001 in SITEX,
that very same location should be applied to SITEX Gateway, otherwise it
would be seen as an unreachable resource due to lack of bw.
//r.a.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2
Erick when you are calling from external numbers (1XXX) to CME/CUE trough
WAN, is there any incoming dial-peer?
You can have serious problems if you have the default dial-peer as the
incoming call leg, for example the use of the transcoder service.
//r.a.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Erick Pi
Hello,
> I personally cannot see any gotchas with dialplan-pattern+SRST
> combination for BR1 site (no CUE there).
> What does your experience suggest? Anyone has any relevant Cisco bug ids
I thought the same as you till I've found out that this command makes a lot
of mess in different situations
To close the loop on this one:
- I tested it today on Proctorlabs kit, TrnsfVM works fine with IPMA.
Bummer, my VmWare kit needs an upgrade :-(
Rgds
Alex
- Original Message -
From: "Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 1:14 PM
Subject: TrnsfVM softkey with IPMA
Hi,
please suggest Good resource to start IPCC and also wrap it up quickly.
SRND and scripting docs are too lengthy
jeremy.
Hello all,
I personally cannot see any gotchas with dialplan-pattern+SRST combination
for BR1 site (no CUE there).
What does your experience suggest? Anyone has any relevant Cisco bug ids
handy?
Thanks very much
Kind regards
Alex
41 matches
Mail list logo
