Dear Sutapa,

I fully agree with Grant, the first question is whether the naturally-produced 
protein is soluble and whether your protein is not a membrane protein, or a 
domain, cut out of a much larger protein? The other question is whether your 
protein is toxic for E.coli and only the bacteria producing it in inclusion 
bodies survive.

Another thing is to consider is to produce the protein in the same class of 
organism as the natural producer, e.g. prokaryotic proteins in a bacterial 
system, mammalian in proteins in mammalian cells etc.

My 2 cents,
Herman

Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] Im Auftrag von Vipul 
Panchal
Gesendet: Montag, 3. April 2017 09:06
An: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Betreff: Re: [ccp4bb] Using a codon-optimised gene to improve protein solubility

There is also lack of information here.  Do you really expect this protein in 
soluble fraction? Is it a membrane associated or transmembrane protein?

Well, I don't have any experience in protein expression using codon 
optimization.
However, Considering the fact that in E.coli it is getting expressed in 
insoluble fraction, I would recommend to co-express this protein with groEL/ES 
system. I have plasmid expressing groEL/ES operon.

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Hansman, Grant 
<g.hans...@dkfz-heidelberg.de<mailto:g.hans...@dkfz-heidelberg.de>> wrote:
Hi,

Why don't you try adding GST/MBP tags first? This is a easy quick test.

We have a nice fusion (MBP) vector for e.coli expression if you want.

Grant

From: Sutapa Chakrabarti 
<chakr...@zedat.fu-berlin.de<mailto:chakr...@zedat.fu-berlin.de><mailto:chakr...@zedat.fu-berlin.de<mailto:chakr...@zedat.fu-berlin.de>>>
Reply-To: Sutapa Chakrabarti 
<chakr...@zedat.fu-berlin.de<mailto:chakr...@zedat.fu-berlin.de><mailto:chakr...@zedat.fu-berlin.de<mailto:chakr...@zedat.fu-berlin.de>>>
Date: Monday 3 April 2017 08:49
To: 
"CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK><mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>>"
 
<CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK><mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK>>>
Subject: [ccp4bb] Using a codon-optimised gene to improve protein solubility

Dear All,

We're trying to express and purify a 1000 residue long protein and have run 
into the problem that it is completely insoluble when expressed in E.coli and 
is not expressed at all in insect cells. The usual tricks for improving 
solubility in E.coli, such as addition of GST/MBP tags, optimising expression 
media and induction conditions and use of different cell strains, have not led 
to any improvement.

We are now looking into ordering a codon-optimised synthetic gene for this 
protein and are trying to decide whether it would be worthwhile to 
codon-optimise for expression in E.coli (given that the protein was expressed 
but not soluble) or if we should attempt baculovirus expression again with a 
gene that has been codon-optimised for insect cells.

My question is:
has anyone observed an improvement in the solubility of their target protein 
using a codon optimised gene?

I know of several instances where the use of a codon-optimised gene has led to 
expression where the native gene sequence did not but am unable to find any 
references for improvement in solubility. Since codon optimisation 
significantly alters the translation rate of a gene, I believe this should 
affect solubility as well; but I'd like to know what the community thinks/has 
observed before I order an exorbitantly priced gene!

Thank you in advance,
Sutapa

--
Sutapa Chakrabarti, Ph.D.
Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry
Freie Universität Berlin
Takustr. 6
14195 Berlin
Germany
Phone: +49-(0)30-83875094



--
Vipul Panchal
Senior Research Fellow,
Respiratory disease and biology,
CSIR-IGIB
(M)-9540113372

Reply via email to