Can't find your reference unless you are referring to this one:
JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS, 1994, VOL .41, NO .12, 2413-2423
In case I'm wrong, could you post the direct link for download of Dale's paper ?
Thanks,
Jürgen
-
Jürgen Bosch
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Department of
> The wave function doesn't collapse to a single outcome
> until the detector measures something
Reference:
Tronrud D, Entanglement-phasing in Quantumcryptocrystallography,
Nature epub, doi:0101010.
On 10-10-15 02:14 PM, Dale Tronrud wrote:
...
The photon both diffracts and doesn't diffract as it passes through
the crystal and it diffracts into all the directions that match the Bragg
condition. The wave function doesn't collapse to a single outcome until
the detector measures something
.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Bryan
Lepore
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 1:07 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] quantum diffraction
btw, buckyballs have measurable wave properties. i think they are trying
virus particles now.=
On 10/15/10 12:38, Bart Hazes wrote:
> The photon moves through the crystal in finite time and most of the time
> it keeps going without interacting with the crystal, i.e. no
> diffraction. However, if diffraction occurs it is instantaneous, or at
> least so fast as to consider it instantaneous. In
btw, buckyballs have measurable wave properties. i think they are trying virus
particles now.
On 10-10-15 10:37 AM, James Holton wrote:
...
In fact, anyone with a Pilatus detector (and a lot of extra beam
time) can verify the self-interference of photons in macromolecular
crystal diffraction. Since the source-to-detector distance of a
typical MX beamline is about 30 m, it takes 100
The photon moves through the crystal in finite time and most of the time
it keeps going without interacting with the crystal, i.e. no
diffraction. However, if diffraction occurs it is instantaneous, or at
least so fast as to consider it instantaneous. In some cases a
diffracted photon diffracts
mail.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Jacob
Keller
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 11:44 AM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] quantum diffraction
> >but yes, each "photon" really does interact with
> EVERY ELECTRON IN THE CRYSTAL at once.
A minor point: the interaction is not
>but yes, each "photon" really does interact with
EVERY ELECTRON IN THE CRYSTAL at once.
A minor point: the interaction is not really "at once," is it? The photon
does have to move through the crystal over a finite time.
JPK
>but yes, each "photon" really does interact with
EVERY ELECTRON IN THE CRYSTAL at once.
Take a crystal from the cave...10m long..perhaps not 'really'...
It is however helpful to think of a coherence volume
of the photon in which it interacts with every atom.
We had some discussions and estim
>but yes, each "photon" really does interact with
EVERY ELECTRON IN THE CRYSTAL at once.
Take a crystal from the cave...10m long..perhaps not 'really'...
It is however helpful to think of a coherence volume
of the photon in which it interacts with every atom.
We had some discussions and estima
Oh dear, here we go again.
I know that there are people out there who have a hard time accepting
quantum mechanics, but yes, each "photon" really does interact with
EVERY ELECTRON IN THE CRYSTAL at once. Young's double-slit experiment
is the simplest form of diffraction, which he performed in
13 matches
Mail list logo
