Re: [ccp4bb] tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

2010-10-21 Thread Ian Tickle
It should be straightforward to work out what you need to do to the Phenix output to make it acceptable to TLSANL. All I need is the piece of Phenix documentation that defines the TLS tensors that you are using. Cheers -- Ian On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Bryan Lepore wrote: >> documentatio

[ccp4bb] Fwd: [ccp4bb] tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

2010-10-21 Thread Bryan Lepore
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Ian Tickle wrote: > There are a number of things that don't look right here, both with the > Refmac and the Phenix runs: [...] interesting, thanks for these comments. > S should not have been symmetrized to actually display the principal axes in molscript, i me

Re: [ccp4bb] tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

2010-10-21 Thread Ian Tickle
There are a number of things that don't look right here, both with the Refmac and the Phenix runs: 1. The Refmac T22 looks too small compared with T11 & T33, unless it really is highly anisotropic, but this would be unusual! Alternatively the elements of T (& possibly L) somehow got in the wro

Re: [ccp4bb] tlsanl *NOW ALSO REFMAC* and phenix TLS results

2010-10-21 Thread Bryan Lepore
> documentation then i conclude the TLS protocol in refmac is markedly different from phenix (i know this is not strictly a ccp4 question). cf. : refmac: TLS RANGE 'A 245.' 'A 252.' ALL ORIGIN14.019 -10.476 -35.068 T 0.4974 0.0372 0.3453 0.0674 0.2984 0.0431 L 21.5463