Re: Fw: new message

At 10:05 AM 11/22/2015, geneb wrote: >Until then, try pointing your DNS to 8.8.8.8 (Google) and see if that prevents >their shenannigans. IMHO, Google has enough shenanigans of their own. I use the Level3 DNS (4.2.2.1 / 4.2.2.2 / 4.2.2.3). Dale H. Cook, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA Osborne 1 / Kaypro

Re: Fw: new message

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015, Jerry Kemp wrote: > A question for the OP. > > I know that since all the Snowden stuff that took place back a bit, many > sites have moved from http to https. > > Is your ISP able to inject content into "secure" https connections? Or only > http transactions, going across t

Re: Fw: new message

A question for the OP. I know that since all the Snowden stuff that took place back a bit, many sites have moved from http to https. Is your ISP able to inject content into "secure" https connections? Or only http transactions, going across the wire in plain text? Jerry On 11/22/15 09:0

Re: Fw: new message

On 2015-11-22 10:05 AM, geneb wrote: On Sun, 22 Nov 2015, Eric Christopherson wrote: My ISP injects into web pages a helpful heads-up message if your account If you can, run screaming to another ISP. I don't care how "helpful" they're trying to be, content injection like that should be punish

Re: Fw: new message

On Sun, 22 Nov 2015, Eric Christopherson wrote: My ISP injects into web pages a helpful heads-up message if your account If you can, run screaming to another ISP. I don't care how "helpful" they're trying to be, content injection like that should be punished with a public skinning. Until th

Re: Fw: new message

Yes they do buy the new merackie gear idiots On Nov 22, 2015 12:14 AM, "Eric Christopherson" wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015, Dave Wade wrote: > > Most browsers can be hijacked via DNS or IP address stealing. Thats how > > much public access wifi works. Any attempt to access any page diverts to > a

Re: Fw: new message

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015, Dave Wade wrote: > Most browsers can be hijacked via DNS or IP address stealing. Thats how > much public access wifi works. Any attempt to access any page diverts to a > login page. True enough. When I first read Chuck's message I misunderstood and thought he meant that IE op

Re: Fw: new message

Most browsers can be hijacked via DNS or IP address stealing. Thats how much public access wifi works. Any attempt to access any page diverts to a login page. On Nov 14, 2015 12:05 AM, "Chuck Guzis" wrote: > On 11/13/2015 09:29 AM, ben wrote: > > Windows new feature ... Auto Click >> Sigh. >> > >

RE: Fw: new message

Here Here! Good work Jay!!! ++ Kevin Parker ++ -Original Message- From: cctalk [mailto:cctalk-boun...@classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Jerome H. Fine Sent: Friday, 13 November 2015 2:29 PM To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts Subject: Re: Fw: new

Re: Fw: new message

No problem. Just make sure that emails from my friend the rich Nigerian prince get through! He's been talking to my banker at the UN. On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Jay West wrote: > Apologies, not sure how that got through. > > Maybe a listmember got address-book-malware. Will see if the he

Re: Fw: new message

On 11/13/2015 09:29 AM, ben wrote: Windows new feature ... Auto Click Sigh. Oh, I don't know if that's a new feature. I recall getting a DSL modem and getting instructions to bring up Internet Explorer after the ethernet cable had been connected to my computer. Well, I don't normally use

Re: Fw: new message

On 11/13/2015 7:13 AM, Dave Woyciesjes wrote: On 11/12/2015 10:25 PM, Jay West wrote: Apologies, not sure how that got through. Maybe a listmember got address-book-malware. Will see if the headers reveal anything that is easy to spot. J No worries. I know enough not to click on suspicious s

Re: Fw: new message

On 11/12/2015 10:25 PM, Jay West wrote: Apologies, not sure how that got through. Maybe a listmember got address-book-malware. Will see if the headers reveal anything that is easy to spot. J No worries. I know enough not to click on suspicious stuff like that... -- --- Dave Woyciesjes --- I

Re: Fw: new message

>Jay West wrote: Apologies, not sure how that got through. Maybe a listmember got address-book-malware. Will see if the headers reveal anything that is easy to spot. So few get through that the VERY rare exception is a credit to your diligence and choice of a great filter. And as many of us

RE: Fw: new message

Apologies, not sure how that got through. Maybe a listmember got address-book-malware. Will see if the headers reveal anything that is easy to spot. J

Re: Fw: new message

On 11/12/2015 09:11 PM, wulfman wrote: On 11/12/2015 7:04 PM, Dave Woyciesjes wrote: On 11/12/2015 06:40 PM, wulfman wrote: On 11/13/2015 8:26 AM, kateli...@trouts.org wrote: Hey! New message, please read kateli...@trouts.org dont open this li

Re: Fw: new message

its a bad place to go. but feel free to ignore good advice any time you wish. On 11/12/2015 7:04 PM, Dave Woyciesjes wrote: > On 11/12/2015 06:40 PM, wulfman wrote: >> dont open this link. >> >> >> On 11/13/2015 8:26 AM, kateli...@trouts.org wrote: >>> Hey! >>> >>> >>> >>> New message, please rea

Re: Fw: new message

On 11/12/2015 06:40 PM, wulfman wrote: dont open this link. On 11/13/2015 8:26 AM, kateli...@trouts.org wrote: Hey! New message, please read kateli...@trouts.org Why not? -- --- Dave Woyciesjes --- ICQ# 905818 --- CompTIA A+ Certified IT T

Re: Fw: new message

dont open this link. On 11/13/2015 8:26 AM, kateli...@trouts.org wrote: > Hey! > > > > New message, please read > > > > kateli...@trouts.org > > -- The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the named addres