RE: OT SQL Server (OK 1 More ?)

2001-06-13 Thread Howarth, Craig (IBK-NY)
o: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: OT SQL Server (OK 1 More ?) > > OK I got it. Now that I have the primary key set with datatype int, the > length is limited to 4. Is this correct and will this limit the table to > records? > > Thanks, > Rich > > -Origina

RE: OT SQL Server WOW THIS LIST IS SLOW!

2001-06-13 Thread Angél Stewart
You're right. >From now on we'll all assume that someone *else* answered your question and not bother. ^_^ -Gel -Original Message- From: Michael Lugassy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] This list is a bit slow, no? about 3490853 peopls have answered pretty simple question... ~~

RE: OT SQL Server (OK 1 More ?)

2001-06-13 Thread Michael Bruce
that you might run into a problem if you have more than 2.1 billion records on that table. Mike Bruce Fig Leaf Software -Original Message- From: ibtoad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 12:32 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: OT SQL Server (OK 1 More ?) OK I got it. Now

RE: OT SQL Server (OK 1 More ?)

2001-06-13 Thread Garza, Jeff
200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.spectrumastro.com -Original Message- From: ibtoad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 9:32 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: OT SQL Server (OK 1 More ?) OK I got it. Now that I have the primary key set with datatype int, the length is limi

Re: OT SQL Server (OK 1 More ?)

2001-06-13 Thread Derek Hamilton
That means 4 bytes. This will limit the number but more like around 30,000. I don't remember the exact number, anyone...? Derek - Original Message - From: "ibtoad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 9

Re: OT SQL Server WOW THIS LIST IS SLOW!

2001-06-13 Thread Michael Lugassy
This list is a bit slow, no? about 3490853 peopls have answered pretty simple question... Thanks, Michael - Original Message - From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 5:32 PM Subject:

RE: OT SQL Server

2001-06-13 Thread Aidan Whitehall
> I have a simple question. How do you set the primary key field to > autonumber in SQL server? I have always used Access where this is a choice > but don't see how to do it with SQL Server 2000. Open Design Table view: - clear the Null column on your PK field - check Identity and - make sur

RE: OT SQL Server (OK 1 More ?)

2001-06-13 Thread ibtoad
Subject: RE: OT SQL Server You must set a field to be identity and not null. You can set its seed to any number (start autonumbering at 1000 for example.) -Original Message- From: ibtoad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 9:37 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT SQL Server

Re: OT SQL Server

2001-06-13 Thread Tim Painter
If you are using SQL Enterprise Manager, in design mode, click on the Identity option and set it to Yes. Optionally, you can set the seed as well. - Original Message - From: "ibtoad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:36 AM Subject: OT

RE: OT SQL Server

2001-06-13 Thread Saidi; Marwan
SQL does not have autonumber, but you can set the field to Identity, then set the Identity seed and Identity increment to whatever you wish. (Seed is your start number, increment, well, that should be obvious. Rich sat down, thought things over, and said ~~ I have a simple question.

Re: OT SQL Server

2001-06-13 Thread Michael Lugassy
Set the field as identity (in the lower table) incremental, and seed are also avaialbe for configuration. Thanks, Michael - Original Message - From: "ibtoad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 4:36 PM Subject: OT SQL Server > I have a s

Re: OT SQL Server

2001-06-13 Thread Bill Davidson
It's the identity check box. Make sure you have allow Nulls deselected. -Bill www.brainbox.tv - Original Message - From: "ibtoad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:36 AM Subject: OT SQL Server > I have a simple question. How do y

Re: OT SQL Server

2001-06-13 Thread net_man
You set identity seed and identity increment to 1 in the design of the table. As well make sure that the Identity box is checked. Robert Filipovich - Original Message - From: "ibtoad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:36 AM Subject:

RE: OT SQL Server

2001-06-13 Thread Dave Watts
> I have a simple question. How do you set the primary key field > to autonumber in SQL server? I have always used Access where > this is a choice but don't see how to do it with SQL Server 2000. In SQL Server, it's called an identity column. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figl

Re: OT SQL Server

2001-06-13 Thread Dick Applebaum
Identity At 10:36 AM -0400 6/13/01, ibtoad wrote: >I have a simple question. How do you set the primary key field to >autonumber in SQL server? I have always used Access where this is a choice >but don't see how to do it with SQL Server 2000. > >Thanks, >Rich ~~

RE: OT SQL Server

2001-06-13 Thread Michael Bruce
In design view of Enterprise manager for the table, check on identity and you see what to do next. -Original Message- From: ibtoad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:37 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT SQL Server I have a simple question. How do you set the primar

RE: OT SQL Server

2001-06-13 Thread Andy Ewings
Select the field to be of type int and also select it to not allow Nulls and to be a identity field. You can then select the seed (first value) and the increment step for every new record. -Original Message- From: ibtoad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 June 2001 15:37 To: CF-Talk Sub

RE: OT SQL Server

2001-06-13 Thread Craig Bowes
You must set a field to be identity and not null. You can set its seed to any number (start autonumbering at 1000 for example.) -Original Message- From: ibtoad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 9:37 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT SQL Server I have a simple question.

RE: OT SQL Server

2001-06-13 Thread Simon Horwith
INT/NOT NULL/IDENTITY ~Simon Simon Horwith Macromedia Certified Instructor Certified ColdFusion Developer Fig Leaf Software 1400 16th St NW, # 500 Washington DC 20036 202.797.6570 (direct line) www.figleaf.com -Original Message- From: ibtoad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: OT: SQL Server 2000

2001-05-31 Thread Eron Cohen
Art, You can just use MS Access 2000's interface to hit SQL Server 2000. You may need to download a patch from Microsoft because there were some changes going from SQL Server 7.0 to 2000. (URL below). It is definitely the best way for folks who are used to MS Access to work with a SQL Server.

Re: OT: SQL Server 2000

2001-05-31 Thread Jeffry Houser
Easiest thing for you to do is get enterprise manager / Query Analyzer. You can order the SQL Server evaluation CD for about $10 off of the microsoft web site. (I.E. Enterprise Manager and Query Analyzer do not time out). You will not be able to run a local SQL Server on Windows 95/98

RE: OT - SQL server memory usage

2001-04-20 Thread Christopher Cortes
River, Are you noticing performance problems or are you just concerned, and is this machine a dedicated database server? Does this occur when there is no database activity at all, or does memory usage drop as database activity decreases? - Chris Christopher Cortes |Coming Q3

RE: OT - SQL server memory usage

2001-04-20 Thread mherbene
You can configure SQL Server (my knowledge is based on 6.5) to use a certain amount of memory, and it will pretty much use that whether it needs it or not. If you think it would be ok with less, you can adjust setting and restart it. -Original Message- From: river [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: OT: SQL Server Query Designer

2001-01-25 Thread Joe Sheble aka Wizaerd
I don't know about running it on W2K, but I have seen that exact message over and over again, and everytime I've gotten it, I re-installed the MDAC from MS, and all was well... At 09:04 AM 1/25/01 -0500, you wrote: >I'm running SQL7 on W2K Professional. When I try to use the query designer >(r

RE: OT SQL SERVER

2001-01-08 Thread DeVoil, Nick
>From http://www.sql-server-performance.com/glossary.asp : When rows are deleted from the leaf level of an index, the are not removed immediately. Instead, they are marked as invalid and are called ghost records. Periodically, SQL Server starts a special housekeeping thread that locates and remov

RE: (OT) SQL Server?

2000-09-05 Thread dougn
: Re: (OT) SQL Server? You would probably have an easier time with storing the .dat or .mpeg files in a directory on the webserver and just storing the url to them in the database. This way when you go to use it, cold fusion and the sql server aren't tied up with a 100megs of file througput

RE: (OT) SQL Server?

2000-09-03 Thread Deva Ramesh
Hellow Akbar Use image data type to that field Thanx Ramesh -Original Message- From: Akbar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2000 7:44 PM To: CF Talk (E-mail) Subject: (OT) SQL Server? hi all, how do we store .mpeg or .dat to be exact movies in SQL server?? wat

Re: (OT) SQL Server?

2000-09-03 Thread Al Musella, DPM
You would probably have an easier time with storing the .dat or .mpeg files in a directory on the webserver and just storing the url to them in the database. This way when you go to use it, cold fusion and the sql server aren't tied up with a 100megs of file througput each time someone wants t

RE: OT SQL Server 7 and Win2K

2000-06-28 Thread Olive, Christopher M Mr USACHPPM
according to MS's site, SQL 7.0 is 100% compliant with Win2K. Chris Olive, DOEHRS Website Administrator -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 3:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT SQL Server 7 and Win2K I am considering

RE: OT SQL Server 7 and Win2K

2000-06-27 Thread Dave Watts
> I am considering upgrading to Win2K. Are there known issues > between Win2K and SQL Server 7.0? In my informal testing (on my development machine) they work fine together. You might want to check the MS support documentation if you want to do this on a production server, but I don't think you'l

Re: (OT) SQL Server 7 data input/retrieval question

2000-04-06 Thread paul smith
Change to check boxes. Your results are then made into a list, for example "1,2" best, paul At 12:04 PM 4/6/00 -0400, you wrote: >Hello, > >Forgive the off topic post, just not sure where else to get the best answer. > >I have an application where I use a list box from which multiple selections

RE: (OT) SQL Server 7 data input/retrieval question

2000-04-06 Thread Dave Watts
> I have an application where I use a list box from which > multiple selections can be made. When a selection is made > and the form is submitted, that selections ID is sent to > the appropriate table column. If two selections are made, > both ID's are sent to the column, etc. > > My problem is t

<    1   2