??
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 4:59 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: nuts & bolts query ?
>
> Connect query analyzer to the appropriate database server. Select the
> appropriate table f
he "bottom (inner) input" ??
I would assume outer means the "members m" table and inner means
"members_categories d" table ??
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 4:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: nuts &
the CF tags, but got a bunch of errors... what's the best way to
> utilize the query analyzer for a baic query like this?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 4:39 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: nuts &
I figured it out... thanks Jeff for the tip
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 4:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: nuts & bolts query ?
The first query creates an inner join between the two tables. Try
dumping them into q
riginal Message-
From: Jeff Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 4:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: nuts & bolts query ?
The first query creates an inner join between the two tables. Try
dumping them into query analyzer and take a look at the execution plan.
It&#
The first query creates an inner join between the two tables. Try
dumping them into query analyzer and take a look at the execution plan.
It'll give you a better idea of what its doing with your queries.
--Jeff
On 5/16/2005 3:45 PM, Tim Laureska wrote:
> I must be losing itWhy do these
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 4:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: nuts & bolts query ?
Yep, your logic is off. If you want to collapse that data, just do a
distinct clause. But, you're then asking your database to do more work
than
necessary. If you just want the compan
Joe Rinehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 3:36 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: nuts & bolts query ?
>
> Tim,
>
> You're getting four records because member_id 13 is associated with
> four member_categories. What is the result you're t
-Talk
Subject: Re: nuts & bolts query ?
Tim,
You're getting four records because member_id 13 is associated with
four member_categories. What is the result you're trying to get?
-Joe
On 5/16/05, Tim Laureska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must be losing itWhy do t
The query you offered below also pulls 4 records
-Original Message-
From: Justin D. Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 3:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: nuts & bolts query ?
> I must be losing it...
Your first query is returning four rows because there are
> SELECT m.company
> FROM members m LEFT JOIN member_categories d
> ON m.member_id = d.member_id
> WHERE m.member_id = #session.member_id#
I think you may also need a GROUP BY...
SELECT m.company
FROM members m LEFT JOIN member_categories d
ON m.member_id = d.member_id
WHERE m.member_id = #sessio
> I must be losing it...
Your first query is returning four rows because there are four matching
results from the member_categories table, so it is returning m.company for
each one of those. If you only want it to return one record from members no
matter how many are in member_categories, you nee
Tim,
You're getting four records because member_id 13 is associated with
four member_categories. What is the result you're trying to get?
-Joe
On 5/16/05, Tim Laureska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must be losing itWhy do these two queries return different sets of
> results when we're only
13 matches
Mail list logo
