MythreyaK wrote:
That sounds reasonable, thank you!
Two more questions,
> If you don't have a compile_commands.json file in your workspace's root
> directory
For the example I was suggesting, only the subprojects have the compilation
database, but `--project-root` would point to the parent
HighCommander4 wrote:
> For multi-workspace (not vscode workspace) projects, say a monorepo where
> each subproject is built individually (and therefore separate build dirs and
> compile_commands.json), is the idea that each subproject will (should?) now
> have its own clangd instance running?
boomanaiden154 wrote:
The fixes specific to the reapply are in
afc14ca0d90e5cea43377954ee5b67e6a5fbeda7.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169972
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
https://github.com/boomanaiden154 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169972
This reverts commit bd04ef6df50e8e6e5212762fc798ea9fbdcfc897.
This reapply fixes the broken case where we would fail at CMake
configuration time if LLVM_INCLUDE_BENCHMARKS was explicitly turned off.
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangd
Author: Aiden Grossman (boomanaiden154)
Changes
This reverts commit bd04ef6df50e8e6e5212762fc798ea9fbdcfc897.
This reapply fixes the broken case where we would fail at CMake
configuration time if LLVM_INCLUDE_BENCHMARKS was explicitly turned
ojhunt wrote:
Seeing link errors from `CustomModuleAnchorSource`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169215
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
darkbuck wrote:
> Any chances of testing something like this at runtime? I know we have the
> external test suite but I don't know how easily we could add a trivial test
> for this stuff
The codegen test is added in this change. For the real test running GPU, I
ported dynamic mandelbrot here
https://github.com/Priyanshu3820 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169310
>From 627bcb3bde64a780ed2b99267d97c9679f9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Priyanshu3820 <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 17:45:00 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Add CIR sqrt builtin support
alexfh wrote:
After manually cleaning up the ~10KB that CVise could squeeze out of the
initial 400+MB, I got this:
```
//--- a.cppmap
module "a" {
header "a.h"
}
//--- b.cppmap
module "b" {
header "b.h"
}
//--- d.cppmap
module "d" {
header "d.h"
}
//--- stl.cppmap
module "stl" {
header "stl.h"
}
MythreyaK wrote:
> > Fix for [clangd/clangd#1480](https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/1480)
>
> You can use [this
> syntax](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue).
Thanks, I keep forgetting it :sweat_smile:
Updated the release
zwuis wrote:
Please add tests to "llvm/unittests/ADT/STLExtrasTest.cpp".
It seems that we should add this function in a separate PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169965
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-c
https://github.com/tsfn closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
alexfh wrote:
> There's also a number of compilations that became significantly slower (or
> hit an infinite loop in Clang).
I will try to find time to get to this part too.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/133057
___
cfe-commits mailing li
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include "llvm/Support/Regex.h"
#include "llvm/Support/WithColor.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
+#include
zwuis wrote:
Should be `llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169965
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
zwuis wrote:
Unrelated changes?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169965
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.
https://github.com/MythreyaK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169880
>From ddcdd9328804c49cda512611f2dc14c4f59e0d9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mythreya
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 21:47:01 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clangd] Fuzzy-match some macros
Allow results from macros tha
https://github.com/inbelic created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169966
This pr implements an initial simple type inference used to improve the types
of a `load`/`store` replacing a `memcpy` when the `%dest` and/or `%src` are an
`alloca` instruction.
As noted within `SimplifyAnyM
Author: mitchell
Date: 2025-11-29T10:36:01+08:00
New Revision: 5dd2b06d60d3eb9b07c7513358ad8b04386f79bc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5dd2b06d60d3eb9b07c7513358ad8b04386f79bc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5dd2b06d60d3eb9b07c7513358ad8b04386f79bc.diff
LOG:
https://github.com/denzor200 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169965
I need this mather at least to implement
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/133110 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/38471
Also maybe we will use it in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proj
https://github.com/denzor200 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169965
>From 0476cfd46a63af25a7f12e7ece5882246208ced9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: denzor200
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 23:51:14 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Implement simple matcher
---
clang/include/clang/ASTMatchers
https://github.com/inbelic ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169966
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zwuis wrote:
It seems that this is a narrowing matcher, not traversal matcher.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169965
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
https://github.com/inbelic edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169966
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions h,cpp --
clang/include/clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchers.h
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Naveen Seth Hanig (naveen-seth)
Changes
This follows PR #169962 and removes the dependency on `clangDriver`
from `clangDependencyScanning`.
`DependencyScanningWorker` now supports only `-cc1` command line inputs and all
funct
mstorsjo wrote:
Thanks!
If I remember correctly, there are a number of preexisting references to the
problem that `exclude_from_explicit_instantiation` doesn't do what it would
need to do on Windows; I think such references may exist in libcxx and/or as
other issues here on github. It would b
https://github.com/Priyanshu3820 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper commented:
nit
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169566
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Priyanshu3820 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -19690,6 +19690,35 @@ class VoidExprEvaluator
// The argument is not evaluated!
return true;
+case Builtin::BI__builtin_assume_dereferenceable: {
+ assert(E->getType()->isVoidType());
+ assert(E->getNumArgs() == 2);
+
+ APSInt ReqSizeVal;
+
https://github.com/naveen-seth edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169962
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Priyanshu3820 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169310
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
arrowd wrote:
Yes please, I don't have rights on this repo.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167642
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++14 -triple
x86_64-unknown-unknown %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++14 -triple
x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter
+
+constexpr int arr[10] = {};
+
+constexpr bool
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++14 -triple
x86_64-unknown-unknown %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++14 -triple
x86_64-unknown-unknown %s -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter
+
+constexpr int arr[10] = {};
+
+constexpr bool
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`llvm-clang-x86_64-gcc-ubuntu` running on `sie-linux-worker3` while building
`clang-tools-extra` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/174/builds/28162
Here i
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
Author: Finn Plummer (inbelic)
Changes
This pr implements an initial simple type inference used to improve the types
of a `load`/`store` replacing a `memcpy` when the `%dest` and/or `%src` are an
`alloca` instruction.
As noted within
mstorsjo wrote:
> Thanks, LGTM. Maybe wait until Friday to merge this to give a bit more time
> for @mstorsjo to comment.
No objection from me to this; I can't say I can confidently review this as
such, but it sounds reasonable.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168170
___
MythreyaK wrote:
For multi-workspace (not vscode workspace) projects, say a monorepo where each
subproject is built individually (and therefore separate build dirs and
compile_commands.json), is the idea that each subproject will (should?) now
have its own clangd instance running?
It mostly
https://github.com/naveen-seth created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169962
This patch is the first of two in refactoring Clang's dependency scanning
tooling to remove its dependency on `clangDriver`.
It separates `Tooling/DependencyScanningTool.cpp` from the rest of
`clangDepende
@@ -98,10 +114,29 @@ static void insertComment(Object &Description, json::Value
&Comment,
}
}
+/// Takes the nested "Children" array from a comment Object.
+///
+/// \return a json::Array of comments, possible json::Value::Kind::Null
static json::Value extractTextComments(
https://github.com/mikomikotaishi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169200
>From 35e95966015d35af747c1a90be64e29dd83c8c51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miko <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 06:53:47 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add link to C++
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169566
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zwuis commented:
Please run "clang/docs/tools/dump_ast_matchers.py" to update documentation.
Please add a release note entry to "clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst".
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169965
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/zeyi2 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169215
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169087
>From 58a8e1e0ea45711e3e326a306e5065090eda6bb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 22:01:13 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Address review feedback, handle extraction better
---
clang-tool
github-actions[bot] wrote:
# :penguin: Linux x64 Test Results
* 85541 tests passed
* 743 tests skipped
* 2 tests failed
## Failed Tests
(click on a test name to see its output)
### Clang
Clang.CIR/CodeGen/three-way-cmp.cpp
```
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stdout):
--
# RUN: at line 1
/home
https://github.com/zwuis edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169965
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169954
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -85,6 +88,41 @@ static mlir::Value getMaskVecValue(CIRGenBuilderTy &builder,
mlir::Location loc,
return maskVec;
}
+static mlir::Value emitX86FunnelShift(CIRGenFunction &cgf,
+ mlir::Location location, mlir::Value
&op0,
+
github-actions[bot] wrote:
# :penguin: Linux x64 Test Results
* 3053 tests passed
* 7 tests skipped
* 1 test failed
## Failed Tests
(click on a test name to see its output)
### Clangd Unit Tests
Clangd Unit
Tests._/ClangdTests/FindReferences/ForwardingInIndex
```
Script:
--
/home/gha/actio
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: J. Ryan Stinnett (jryans)
Changes
This moves a few existing debug info flags that were floating in the general
pool of unorganised flags over to the existing groups for debug info flags (so
that they are presented together in documentatio
https://github.com/MythreyaK edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169880
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/naveen-seth edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169962
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2283,6 +2283,37 @@ using HasOpNameMatcher =
HasOpNameMatcher hasAnyOperatorNameFunc(ArrayRef NameRefs);
+/// Matches nodes of type T (CompoundStmt or StmtExpr) that contain a sequence
+/// of consecutive substatements matching the provided matchers in order.
+///
+/// See
https://github.com/Islam-Imad created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169957
This patch refactors the handling of elementwise integer unary operations to
use a unified callback-based approach, eliminating code duplication.
Changes:
- Extended interp__builtin_elementwise_int_unaryop t
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Islam Imad (Islam-Imad)
Changes
This patch refactors the handling of elementwise integer unary operations to
use a unified callback-based approach, eliminating code duplication.
Changes:
- Extended interp__builtin_elementwise_int_unaryop
https://github.com/DEBADRIBASAK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166568
>From fd8693c51af7d9f91be0926f4150e77c39e2dba4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Debadri Basak
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:07:42 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Adding the lifetime stats collection logic to
AnalysisB
luporl wrote:
About the test failures:
- Flang :: Lower/location.f90
- was already failing in release builds (#164667)
- LLVM :: Object/ar-create.test
- LLVM :: Object/archive-extract-dir.test
- LLVM :: tools/llvm-ar/mri-addlib.test
- LLVM :: tools/llvm-ar/mri-errors.test
- LLVM :: tools/llvm-
https://github.com/jryans created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169942
This moves a few existing debug info flags that were floating in the general
pool of unorganised flags over to the existing groups for debug info flags (so
that they are presented together in documentation).
As
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tools-extra
Author: Naveen Seth Hanig (naveen-seth)
Changes
This patch is the first of two in refactoring Clang's dependency scanning
tooling to remove its dependency on `clangDriver`.
It separates `Tooling/DependencyScanningTool.cpp` from the re
https://github.com/Andres-Salamanca created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169967
This PR upstreams support for the `cir.indirectBr` operation, which is used to
implement GCC’s labels-as-values `indirect goto`.
To ensure correct lowering, we introduce precise bookkeeping to associate
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (Andres-Salamanca)
Changes
This PR upstreams support for the `cir.indirectBr` operation, which is used to
implement GCC’s labels-as-values `indirect goto`.
To ensure correct lowering, we introduce precise
https://github.com/mstorsjo approved this pull request.
LGTM too
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167642
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-adt
Author: Denis Mikhailov (denzor200)
Changes
I need this mather at least to implement
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/133110 and
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/38471
Also maybe we will use it in https://github.com/llvm/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: David Stone (davidstone)
Changes
To make this change, we have to use `lookup` instead of `operator[]` on a map.
They both return the same thing: a default constructed value. The difference is
that `lookup` default constructs a value and t
https://github.com/mikomikotaishi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169200
>From 35e95966015d35af747c1a90be64e29dd83c8c51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miko <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 06:53:47 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add link to C++
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you, it
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Marco Elver (melver)
Changes
The fsanitize.c test is one of the slowest tests we have:
```
-- Testing: 1 tests, 1 workers --
PASS: Clang :: Driver/fsanitize.c (1 of 1)
Testing Time: 18.42s
```
It has beco
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-debuginfo
Author: J. Ryan Stinnett (jryans)
Changes
This moves a few existing debug info flags that were floating in the general
pool of unorganised flags over to the existing groups for debug info flags (so
that they are presented together in document
@@ -8239,13 +8239,26 @@ class MappableExprsHandler {
ElementType = CAT->getElementType().getTypePtr();
else if (VAT)
ElementType = VAT->getElementType().getTypePtr();
-else
- assert(&Component == &*Components.begin() &&
-
@@ -318,8 +319,67 @@
getExplicitAndImplicitNVPTXTargetFeatures(clang::DiagnosticsEngine &diags,
return llvm::join(featuresVec, ",");
}
+enum ppcCPU { prePwr8, prePwr10 };
+static std::optional ppcType(std::string &cpu) {
+ return llvm::StringSwitch>(cpu)
+ .Case("futu
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/chaitanyav updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169869
>From 9d2faf6196c580558a1fac3eeb463cda2cdc927b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NagaChaitanya Vellanki
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 19:18:31 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [Clang] Make __builtin_assume_dereferenceable co
mstorsjo wrote:
> @mstorsjo This fixes [#135910
> (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/135910#issuecomment-2907742933)
That's great! Does this, together with
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168170, address the overall problem
in #135910, or are there many other iss
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clangir
Author: Hendrik Hübner (HendrikHuebner)
Changes
This PR upstreams the three way compare op from the incubator repo
---
Patch is 36.96 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169963.diff
10
https://github.com/mgcarrasco closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162282
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
DanBlackwell wrote:
> > I appreciate the effort you've put into this @BStott6; are you using
> > `atomic_thread_fence` in a way that gives false positives? Perhaps I can
> > try to add support for them in TSan (it looks like someone has a workaround
> > here for now: https://stackoverflow.com/
https://github.com/daniilavdeev closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164128
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/naveen-seth edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169962
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions h,cpp --
clang/test/CIR/CodeGen/Inputs/std-compare.h
c
https://github.com/HendrikHuebner created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169963
This PR upstreams the three way compare op from the incubator repo
From 32285f45356c6d4d1986e0ee144b6821e992f4c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: hhuebner
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 23:41:30 +0100
Subject: [PA
https://github.com/DEBADRIBASAK updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166568
>From fd8693c51af7d9f91be0926f4150e77c39e2dba4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Debadri Basak
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:07:42 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] Adding the lifetime stats collection logic to
AnalysisB
https://github.com/naveen-seth reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kkwli wrote:
> While it makes sense to me that target features are set-up and emitted for
> PPC, I do not get why the way is done has to be modified in a custom way for
> PPC (see inline comments). I am not saying the changes are not needed, I just
> do not understand why it is only needed for
naveen-seth wrote:
This patch is currently based on #169962 and requires it to land first.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169964
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
DEBADRIBASAK wrote:
@Xazax-hun @usx95 I do not think it is feasible to add the `StmtClassName` and
`QualType` as keys without converting them to strings.
1. I tried using a DenseMap with `QualType` as the keys, but that is not
allowed since QualType does not have tombstone.
2. I was planning t
mstorsjo wrote:
> I have just re-reviewed my changes once more to be sure. Can we merge this?
Feel free to. Or do you need someone else to merge it for you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/167642
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@list
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Priyanshu3820 wrote:
just saw PR #165682 has been merged, which removes these x86 sqrt builtins from
clang. I'm waiting for guidance on whether CIR should still implement these or
follow upstream's direction with __builtin_elementwise_sqrt.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169310
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper commented:
NIT
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169566
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/naveen-seth closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163371
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -fopenmp -ferror-limit 100 %s -Wuninitialized
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -fopenmp-simd -ferror-limit 100 %s -Wuninitialized
+
+extern void *malloc(__SIZE_TYPE__);
+extern void free(void *);
alexey-bataev wrote:
Clang
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usx95 commented:
Thanks. LGTM.
Last few comments:
- I would suggest to build LLVM using this to be sure we do not introduce
crashes. Maybe see if we have some suggestions already.
- Filed a bug for implicit this
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/169941. Please add
https://github.com/timon-ul updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169742
>From 44ebad6933fccab5bcfc866ee56dd5381da5f452 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timon Ulrich
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 10:40:14 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] clangd: make forwarding heuristic available for more
locati
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169566
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
daniilavdeev wrote:
Split into: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166597,
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164813,
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169653
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164128
___
cfe-commits mail
https://github.com/usx95 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169767
___
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ahmednoursphinx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169214
>From 60fac68bef81335aa12e2faa7e364bb647a51872 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ahmed
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2025 14:21:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] [Clang][x86]: allow PCLMULQDQ intrinsics to be used in
c
1 - 100 of 2571 matches
Mail list logo
