On 28 May 2016 12:58 a.m., "Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits" <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I think that would be a possibility. However IMO such a change has little
value. Unlike other uses of `_LIBCPP_PREFERRED_OVERLOAD`, which fix const
correctness issue, I don't think the int vs bool re
I think that would be a possibility. However IMO such a change has little
value. Unlike other uses of `_LIBCPP_PREFERRED_OVERLOAD`, which fix const
correctness issue, I don't think the int vs bool return type distinction as
that important. Perhaps I"m just being ignorant?
/Eric
___
Could we use __LIBCPP_PREFERRED_OVERLOAD to get this working even with
older glibc (and recent clang)?
On 27 May 2016 3:26 p.m., "Eric Fiselier via cfe-commits" <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: ericwf
> Date: Fri May 27 17:19:53 2016
> New Revision: 271060
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/v
