On 2/17/08, Robert Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 01:39 PM 2/14/2008, Mike Blodgett wrote:
>
> > > MS 2000.
> > >
> > > I am just looking to see if there is a router/network hardware
> solution for
> > > this. The do not want to map drives,
> > > they want to see all shares/printers in Net
Hi,
On Saturday, February 16, 2008 6:38 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Brian Landers wrote:
>
> > On Feb 15, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Jeff Kell wrote:
> >
> > > Recently upgraded 7.2(2) -> 7.2(3)12 and our network monitors
> > > stopped reading interface stats off the ASAs. Anyo
Nathan <> wrote on Monday, February 18, 2008 12:59 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried all the MPLS troubleshooting docs I've been able to find,
> and hard resets of BGP sessions, but I must be missing something.
>
> I have four routers in a row, A B C D, I want packets to go inside a
> VRF from A to D. Pa
Cedric Gavage wrote:
> srr-queue gives +/- good result... on outgoing traffic...
> but... no effect for the incoming traffic with the service-policy...
Check 'mls qos' is enabled globally on the switch (sh mls qos).
If this is a production network, bear in mind that enabling mls qos (if
it isn'
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:28:09PM -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
> Tony Varriale wrote:
> > Are they cheaper once you buy the software license? Let's not forget,
> > the software license is not transferrable.
> >
> > That's a typical oops not only in this method but from 3rd party resellers.
>
> T
Anyone seen this: Have a router set up with one static NAT translation for
remote access. About every other day, the ability to RDP in from the
outside is lost. To restore, I have to "no" the command and then re-enter
it. And then it works. no other functionality is lost (site-to-site VPN,
us
Hi,
I've tried all the MPLS troubleshooting docs I've been able to find,
and hard resets of BGP sessions, but I must be missing something.
I have four routers in a row, A B C D, I want packets to go inside a
VRF from A to D. Packets travel from B to D without any problem, but
not from A to D. My
>
> Phil
>
> On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Zahid Hassan wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>
>> I am trying to increase bandwidth between my 7600s running as
>> PE/P routers with 1G line cards terminating dark fibre links.
>>
>> I am exploring the following two options:
>>
>> Option I
>> -
>> -
The Etherchannel depends on your traffic makeup. If you have a ton of
traffic between two hosts, then it's not going to do you much good.
For something like an Internet distribution of src/dst it works very
well.
You should have no issues with Etherchannel over CWDM, it's agnostic
to the
At 01:39 PM 2/14/2008, Mike Blodgett wrote:
> > MS 2000.
> >
> > I am just looking to see if there is a router/network hardware solution for
> > this. The do not want to map drives,
> > they want to see all shares/printers in Network Barrio. Welcome to
> > government. If there is not a network sol
Brad Henshaw wrote:
>
> The best you can hope for is to rate-limit outbound traffic to the PC
> and police it inbound from the PC. Policing will impact TCP flows
> pretty badly.
>
> Assuming a 100Mbps connection to the PC:
>
> policy-map police-5mbps
> class class-default
> police 500
Cedric Gavage wrote:
> The goal is to limit the bandwith for one computer connected on one
> interface... For example, to authorize max 5 Mbits for this computer
> (incoming and outgoing traffic)...
The best you can hope for is to rate-limit outbound traffic to the PC and
police it inbound fro
Hi,
I'm not (yet) familiar with Cisco switches... but what is the best
solution to do ratelimit/shaping on one interface...
The goal is to limit the bandwith for one computer connected on one
interface... For example, to authorize max 5 Mbits for this computer
(incoming and outgoing traffic)..
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 08:29:27PM +0530, Hitesh Vinzoda wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I m having a HSRP running between two 4507 and PIM Sparse on SVI's of both
> the interface. I had configured Static RP for multicast for a specific
> group. Now the problem is when PIM Sparse is enabled on HSRP interfaces
>
Don't you know that every vendor will call an unresolved or less important bug
a "feature"? Therefore there won't be any fixes, because you don't fix
something if it's not broken...
:)
Ziv
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Travis
Se
I'm not sure what's your scenario, but I'll describe you a "working" one
A router wih both subnets on the same interface, such as:
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip directed-broadcast
!
Then, from a PC with the IP
Gert Doering <> wrote on Saturday, February 16, 2008 1:25 PM:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 01:04:13PM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote:
>> And actually, as another poster pointed out, ES20 isn't 10k
>> more, but same price as SIP600+1x10GE.
>
> Which makes it actually quite interesting (... if it wou
17 matches
Mail list logo
