-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If it's a thinclient, isn't it running firmware or something else
that you are probably not going to be able to load anything onto (the
endpoint) component anyways?
I would look into some sort of authentication to lock the ports
down. If ther
Jose,
Take a look at vlan-based QOS
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/software/relea
se/12.2_44_se/configuration/guide/swqos.html#wp1703760
Arie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 1
Please try here as there are couple of awesome white papers here on PfR.
www.cisco.com/go/srnd
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:18 AM, mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have a link to the protocol the Optimized Edge Routing uses to
> communicate?
> I am curious what the protocol is and wha
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 08:53:43PM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> But we're used to counting problems nowadays, aren't we? :)
I've actually given up trying to keep track of Cisco counter bugs...
"Too many for a single brain to remember"
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:39:46AM -0700, Robert Beckett wrote:
> You actually have two bugs here:
>
> for the "Output queue :0/40"
> CSCdx72484 show interface has an inconsistent format in Output queue
> display
>
> for the "ouxtput"
> CSCdz44280 5 minute output/input rate does not display corr
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:22:38AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> > > You should really shop by feature set. Advanced Enterprise IOS
> > > licenses are expensive.
> >
> > Except on ASR1000, where the full-blown Advanced Enterprise image
> > (positioned for "Enterprise users") is 10kUSD list, vs. t
Does anyone have a link to the protocol the Optimized Edge Routing uses to
communicate?
I am curious what the protocol is and what it does.
>From the documentation it uses port 3949 which corresponds to something called
"Dynamic Routing Information Protocol".
--
LR Mack McBride
Network Administra
Hello Justin:
> From: Justin Shore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:32:29 -0500
> To: 'Cisco-nsp'
> Subject: [c-nsp] OT: Ethernet over DS3 or OC3 bridge
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions for a Ethernet to DS3 or OC3 bridge? I
> need multiple DS3 support for the longer-term b
Hi All
i am a bit confused between Interface queues that can be configured using
tx-queue-limit and hold-queue , what is the difference between these queues
?
appreciate your replies .
best regards
--Ibrahim
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck
On Thursday 24 July 2008 05:19:28 Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
wrote:
> > r(config)#router isis
> > r(config-router)#ignore-attached-bit
> > r(config-router)#
>
> When/why would you want to do that?
Just to add to what Shankar mentioned, in our particular
case, we only use IS-IS to carry our infrast
Hi everyone. Ran into a little snag this afternoon when I needed to
police layer 2 customers on a single port in a similar fashion to the
way we do it on the 3550-24s. Normally we would we create the aggregate
policer, use a class map that matches on vlan id and another one that
matches any i
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:50:42PM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:00:16AM -0500, Justin C. Darby wrote:
> > You should really shop by feature set. Advanced Enterprise IOS
> > licenses are expensive.
>
> Except on ASR1000, where the full-blown Advanced Enterprise im
Skeeve Stevens wrote:
What is the best strategy to Block Forged Source Addresses on a Cisco border
router?
It was just recently discussed. Use uRPF.
--
"Don't expect me to cry for all the | Łukasz Bromirski
reasons you had to die" -- Kurt Cobain |http://lukasz.bromirski.
What is the best strategy to Block Forged Source Addresses on a Cisco border
router?
.Skeeve
--
Skeeve Stevens, RHCE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.skeeve.org
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
eintellego - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.eintellego.net
--
I'm a groove licked love child king of the ver
14 matches
Mail list logo