We have a similar setup but with X2 interfaces, so no X2 to SFP+ convertors and
that works just fine. Have you checked the transceiver parameters ?
Maybe they are not within limit causing a shutdown of the interface ?
(temperature, input power, output power). The first batch of (non-cisco) X2
tr
I'm having trouble joining some multicast streams. The upstream router
joins it fine. The upstream has (*,G) and (S,G) in the mroute table.
Downstream doesn't have (S,G). This is a sparse mode environment with a
static RP.
>From the router with trouble I can ping the mcast group and get
respons
Thanks, that worked. But I wonder if windows allows this? I can now
see the device, but it seems I have no access if i'm on a different
subnet.
Dan.
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Anton Kapela wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Dan Letkeman wrote:
>
>> Am I missing something? Or does t
On 2010-05-10 22:21, Kevin Loch wrote:
I migrated from a 2500w AC power supplies (running at 120v/1250w) to
2500w DC power supplies without any reboots or problems so
you can mix and match AC/DC supplies of the same rating.
Right. No mysterious reboots should be observed when moving the power
s
Greetings,
I have an open TAC case about this but I figured I'd ask here as well.
I recently installed 10 3750-Es in 5 2-member stacks. Each stack has 2 uplinks
to a 6509-VSS. I'm using X2 to SFP+ converters and 10G SFP+ modules on both
ends of the links between the stacks and the VSS. In each
I migrated from a 2500w AC power supplies (running at 120v/1250w) to
2500w DC power supplies without any reboots or problems so
you can mix and match AC/DC supplies of the same rating.
- Kevin
Jason Lixfeld wrote:
As long as the power supply you are installing is exactly the same as the power
On Monday 10 May 2010 11:02:20 pm Nam NGUYEN wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your quick feedbacks. I now have a
> better understanding of the scenario. In my network, the
> optical links between the client routers and RRs have
> had problem a few times due to transportation faults
> from service pro
FWSM running 4.0(6) transparent mode with sup 720 SXI3
I have 3 bridge groups configured on a FWSM and each connects to a different
ISP. Each bridge has an INSIDE and OUTSIDE interface, with the OUTSIDE
connected to each ISP.
I currently have all the INSIDE interfaces in one ASR-GROUP and th
Hi all,
Thanks a lot for your quick feedbacks. I now have a better understanding of
the scenario. In my network, the optical links between the client routers
and RRs have had problem a few times due to transportation faults from
service provider, so I'm now afraid of a time when they all die.
Tha
On 10/05/2010 08:34, Marian Ďurkovič wrote:
> LRM SFP+ is just part of the stuff you need. For LRM to work, the switch
> linecard must have appropriate EDC functionality. If it's not there, it simply
> won't work.
To give some back-ground on this, LRM is long-reach multimode. As it's
multimode, m
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 09:51:39AM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> Well, SR _are_ "supported" in SPA-1X10GE-L-V2 when used in CRS-1,
> SCE8000 and ASR1000, just not uBR10k.
I have to partially correct myself here. I can personally testify that
they are supported in ASR1000 (see also Release Notes IO
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 19:51 +0100, Rob Shakir wrote:
> We had something similar a while back, I progressed it via TAC and it
> was matched to CSCsi68355, this was only on standby SUPs in
> 12.2(33)SXH I believe.
>
> The TAC engineer expanded on the (minimal) bug notes with:
>
> "It is a cosmetic
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 08:34:05AM +0200, Marian ??urkovi?? wrote:
> LRM SFP+ is just part of the stuff you need. For LRM to work, the switch
> linecard must have appropriate EDC functionality. If it's not there, it simply
> won't work.
Interesting. Thanks.
> > On a similar topic, I'm still waiti
On Monday 10 May 2010 02:23:42 pm Nam NGUYEN wrote:
> I have a small network running IBGP with 2 designated
> route reflectors. Everything now is working fine. My
> question is that, if the 2 RRs are down for some
> reasons, can other routers in the cluster keep
> forwarding packets during the
On Sun, 9 May 2010 22:17:11 +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote
> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 07:01:48AM +1000, Lincoln Dale wrote:
> > i doubt anyone has successfully deployed it as LRM is not supported on N5K
or N2K.
> > there are technical reasons behind why its not supported.
>
> Could you elaborate on tha
Hello Nam,
I have a small network running IBGP with 2 designated route reflectors.
Everything now is working fine. My question is that, if the 2 RRs are down
for some reasons, can other routers in the cluster keep forwarding packets
during the down time of RRs? In other words, will routing table
16 matches
Mail list logo
