Re: [c-nsp] %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power low warning; Operating value: -12.5 dBm, Threshold value -9.9 dBm

2011-01-23 Thread Piotr Wojciechowski
On 1/24/11 8:41 AM, Farooq Razzaque wrote: > > Hi All > > I am receiving the following errors on aggregation switch (WS-C3560E-12SD-E) > which is connected with Core switch (Cat. 6513) > > %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power low warning; Operating value: > -12.5 dBm, Threshold val

[c-nsp] %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power low warning; Operating value: -12.5 dBm, Threshold value -9.9 dBm

2011-01-23 Thread Farooq Razzaque
Hi All I am receiving the following errors on aggregation switch (WS-C3560E-12SD-E) which is connected with Core switch (Cat. 6513) %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power low warning; Operating value: -12.5 dBm, Threshold value -9.9 dBm

[c-nsp] IPSEC sanity check

2011-01-23 Thread Justin M. Streiner
A company I occasionally do some work for (Company A) wants to build a site-to-site VPN to another company's (Company B) network. By itself, that's not too big of a deal, however, the Company B is requiring that the host(s) from Company A that are tunneled through the VPN have globally routabl

Re: [c-nsp] 6500/Sup720 won't run a WS-X6516-GBIC?

2011-01-23 Thread David Prall
http://www9.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/releas e/notes/hardware.pdf Looks like you might need to upgrade the ROMMON. On page 45: Note . Use with Release 12.2(33)SXH or later and a DFC requires DFC ROMMON version 12.2(18r)S1 or later. To display the switching module R

Re: [c-nsp] 6500/Sup720 won't run a WS-X6516-GBIC?

2011-01-23 Thread GP Wooden
Converted, as into vss... - Reply message - From: "GP Wooden" Date: Sun, Jan 23, 2011 3:22 pm Subject: [c-nsp] 6500/Sup720 won't run a WS-X6516-GBIC? To: "Jeff Kell" , "cisco-nsp" Ran into the same issue with that card when I converted a bunch of our distro's with that same sup. Luckil

Re: [c-nsp] 6500/Sup720 won't run a WS-X6516-GBIC?

2011-01-23 Thread GP Wooden
Ran into the same issue with that card when I converted a bunch of our distro's with that same sup. Luckily, I was able to move the connects to a 6748 card and just changed fiber jumpers. - Reply message - From: "Jeff Kell" Date: Sun, Jan 23, 2011 2:22 pm Subject: [c-nsp] 6500/Sup720 w

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 SUP720 datacenter setup

2011-01-23 Thread jkrejci
No experience with the fw module but if you had an asa or any fw (single or pair) you could run the outside interface(s) off the 6500 on one vlan, then one or more physical inside interfaces back to the 6500 with one or more vlans per customer. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original

Re: [c-nsp] 6500/Sup720 won't run a WS-X6516-GBIC?

2011-01-23 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 23/01/2011 20:22, Jeff Kell wrote: *Aug 6 20:00:06.931: %C6KPWR-SP-4-UNSUPPORTED: unsupported module in slot 3, power not allowed: The image for the card is not bundled in image. [...] 3 16 SFM-capable 16 port 1000mb GBICWS-X6516-GBIC SAD061902L2 55 Supervisor Engine

[c-nsp] 6500/Sup720 won't run a WS-X6516-GBIC?

2011-01-23 Thread Jeff Kell
Is this module not supported on this Supervisor? Have a 6509 running s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI3.bin. Getting this at startup: *Aug 6 20:00:06.931: %C6KPWR-SP-4-UNSUPPORTED: unsupported module in slot 3, power not allowed: The image for the card is not bundled in image. Jeff >show

[c-nsp] 6500 SUP720 datacenter setup

2011-01-23 Thread Lars Eidsheim
I am looking for advice regarding a 6500 layout in a datacenter setup. The 6500 has SUP720-3B running 12.2(33) SXI4 Adv.IP Services. The initial design was to terminate and route customers on the 6500 using a unique VLAN for each customer and allocate a IP subnet for each VLAN. An issue about t

[c-nsp] cet/ceN/men

2011-01-23 Thread jack daniels
Hi guys, what is the diffrence between CET-CEN-Metro Ethernet. Regards ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] %SIBYTE-CFC10-3-CORRECTABLE_ECC_ERR (6500 switch)

2011-01-23 Thread Farooq Razzaque
Hi U mean in (%SIBYTE-CFC10-3) 10 is the line card which is generating this error.. what number '3' is reflecting in this log.. From: farooq_...@hotmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 16:49:06 +0500 Subject: [c-nsp] %SIBYTE-CFC10-3-CORRECTABLE_ECC_ERR (6500

Re: [c-nsp] SLA route tracking

2011-01-23 Thread Anton Kapela
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote: > I would also recommend using the "delay up NN" option - this will allow > you to make sure the route is back and stays up, and not react to > network flapping. For extra points, I'd suggest the user add static routes *naming the outp

Re: [c-nsp] QinQ on 3550 not working?

2011-01-23 Thread Anton Kapela
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Tony wrote: ] >> When the Customer site switch is a 3560, I can "ping >> 172.30.1.1" and >> "ping vrf network2 172.40.1.1" without problem. >> >> When the Customer site switch is a 3550, I can "ping >> 172.30.1.1" fine, but >> trying to "ping vrf network2 172.40.1.

Re: [c-nsp] SLA route tracking

2011-01-23 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
I would also recommend using the "delay up NN" option - this will allow you to make sure the route is back and stays up, and not react to network flapping. Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev

Re: [c-nsp] About Problem on Policay based routing

2011-01-23 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
I would suggest you try this mode of configuration: track 1 interface GigabitEthernet3/1 line-protocol delay up 15 ! track 2 interface GigabitEthernet3/2 line-protocol delay up 15 ! route-map test2 permit 10 match ip address 100 set ip next-hop verify-availability 10.2.3.3 10 track 1 set ip n

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS on 7401ASR

2011-01-23 Thread Jeroen van Ingen
Hi Ziv, Jeroen, We're doing AToM / EoMPLS on a few 7206VXR NPE-G1 with no problems, we're using Ver 12.2(33)SRC6 IOS Hope this helps Ziv Thanks, that's good to know. I noticed that EoMPLS is also supported on the 1841 platform which is even more affordable, so I'll start getting me one o

Re: [c-nsp] About Problem on Policay based routing

2011-01-23 Thread Ziv Leyes
Try using the recursive option, so it forwards packets to default when the next-hop is unavailable route-map dst_80 q match ip address 101 set ip next-hop recursive 202.53.x.x Or, if not available in your version (unlikely) ,try adding a secondary next-hop to the route-map route-map dst_80 q m

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS on 7401ASR

2011-01-23 Thread Ziv Leyes
Jeroen, We're doing AToM / EoMPLS on a few 7206VXR NPE-G1 with no problems, we're using Ver 12.2(33)SRC6 IOS Hope this helps Ziv -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeroen van Ingen Sent: Friday, January 21,

Re: [c-nsp] %SIBYTE-CFC10-3-CORRECTABLE_ECC_ERR (6500 switch)

2011-01-23 Thread Piotr Wojciechowski
On 1/23/11 12:49 PM, Farooq Razzaque wrote: > > > Hi All > > I am getting the following errors on 6500 > > %SIBYTE-CFC10-3-CORRECTABLE_ECC_ERR: A correctable ECC error has occurred, > A_BUS_L2_ERRORS: 0x0, A_BUS_MEMIO_ERRORS: 0xFF, A_SCD_BUS_ERR_STATUS: > 0xC0DC3000 > > > Attached is the o

[c-nsp] %SIBYTE-CFC10-3-CORRECTABLE_ECC_ERR (6500 switch)

2011-01-23 Thread Farooq Razzaque
Hi All I am getting the following errors on 6500 %SIBYTE-CFC10-3-CORRECTABLE_ECC_ERR: A correctable ECC error has occurred, A_BUS_L2_ERRORS: 0x0, A_BUS_MEMIO_ERRORS: 0xFF, A_SCD_BUS_ERR_STATUS: 0xC0DC3000 Attached is the outputs of show environment command. Apparently all the environment a

[c-nsp] NGN Carrier Ethernet / Metro Ethernet Design

2011-01-23 Thread jack daniels
Hi guys, Please guide me link on internet to download any good book for NGN Carrier ethernet Design which talks about VPLS,HVPLS, HQOS,OAM,Performance Monitoring,ERPS, etc Regrads ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.ne

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS on 7401ASR

2011-01-23 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Sorry, I can't see any 12.2S images for this platform... Arie -Original Message- From: Jeroen van Ingen [mailto:jer...@zijndomein.nl] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 01:27 To: Arie Vayner (avayner) Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS on 7401ASR Hi Arie, list, > A qui