On 1/24/11 8:41 AM, Farooq Razzaque wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> I am receiving the following errors on aggregation switch (WS-C3560E-12SD-E)
> which is connected with Core switch (Cat. 6513)
>
> %SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power low warning; Operating value:
> -12.5 dBm, Threshold val
Hi All
I am receiving the following errors on aggregation switch (WS-C3560E-12SD-E)
which is connected with Core switch (Cat. 6513)
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power low warning; Operating value:
-12.5 dBm, Threshold value -9.9 dBm
A company I occasionally do some work for (Company A) wants to build a
site-to-site VPN to another company's (Company B) network. By itself,
that's not too big of a deal, however, the Company B is requiring
that the host(s) from Company A that are tunneled through the VPN have
globally routabl
http://www9.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/releas
e/notes/hardware.pdf
Looks like you might need to upgrade the ROMMON.
On page 45:
Note
. Use with Release 12.2(33)SXH or later and a DFC requires DFC ROMMON
version 12.2(18r)S1 or
later. To display the switching module R
Converted, as into vss...
- Reply message -
From: "GP Wooden"
Date: Sun, Jan 23, 2011 3:22 pm
Subject: [c-nsp] 6500/Sup720 won't run a WS-X6516-GBIC?
To: "Jeff Kell" , "cisco-nsp"
Ran into the same issue with that card when I converted a bunch of our distro's
with that same sup. Luckil
Ran into the same issue with that card when I converted a bunch of our distro's
with that same sup. Luckily, I was able to move the connects to a 6748 card and
just changed fiber jumpers.
- Reply message -
From: "Jeff Kell"
Date: Sun, Jan 23, 2011 2:22 pm
Subject: [c-nsp] 6500/Sup720 w
No experience with the fw module but if you had an asa or any fw (single or
pair) you could run the outside interface(s) off the 6500 on one vlan, then one
or more physical inside interfaces back to the 6500 with one or more vlans per
customer.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original
On 23/01/2011 20:22, Jeff Kell wrote:
*Aug 6 20:00:06.931: %C6KPWR-SP-4-UNSUPPORTED: unsupported module in slot 3,
power not allowed: The image for the card is not bundled in image.
[...]
3 16 SFM-capable 16 port 1000mb GBICWS-X6516-GBIC SAD061902L2
55 Supervisor Engine
Is this module not supported on this Supervisor? Have a 6509 running
s72033-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI3.bin.
Getting this at startup:
*Aug 6 20:00:06.931: %C6KPWR-SP-4-UNSUPPORTED: unsupported module in
slot 3, power not allowed: The image for the card is not bundled in image.
Jeff
>show
I am looking for advice regarding a 6500 layout in a datacenter setup. The 6500
has SUP720-3B running 12.2(33) SXI4 Adv.IP Services. The initial design was to
terminate and route customers on the 6500 using a unique VLAN for each customer
and allocate a IP subnet for each VLAN.
An issue about t
Hi guys,
what is the diffrence between CET-CEN-Metro Ethernet.
Regards
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi
U mean in (%SIBYTE-CFC10-3) 10 is the line card which is generating this
error..
what number '3' is reflecting in this log..
From: farooq_...@hotmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 16:49:06 +0500
Subject: [c-nsp] %SIBYTE-CFC10-3-CORRECTABLE_ECC_ERR (6500
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Arie Vayner (avayner)
wrote:
> I would also recommend using the "delay up NN" option - this will allow
> you to make sure the route is back and stays up, and not react to
> network flapping.
For extra points, I'd suggest the user add static routes *naming the
outp
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Tony wrote:
]
>> When the Customer site switch is a 3560, I can "ping
>> 172.30.1.1" and
>> "ping vrf network2 172.40.1.1" without problem.
>>
>> When the Customer site switch is a 3550, I can "ping
>> 172.30.1.1" fine, but
>> trying to "ping vrf network2 172.40.1.
I would also recommend using the "delay up NN" option - this will allow
you to make sure the route is back and stays up, and not react to
network flapping.
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev
I would suggest you try this mode of configuration:
track 1 interface GigabitEthernet3/1 line-protocol
delay up 15
!
track 2 interface GigabitEthernet3/2 line-protocol
delay up 15
!
route-map test2 permit 10
match ip address 100
set ip next-hop verify-availability 10.2.3.3 10 track 1
set ip n
Hi Ziv,
Jeroen,
We're doing AToM / EoMPLS on a few 7206VXR NPE-G1 with no problems, we're using
Ver 12.2(33)SRC6 IOS
Hope this helps
Ziv
Thanks, that's good to know. I noticed that EoMPLS is also supported on
the 1841 platform which is even more affordable, so I'll start getting
me one o
Try using the recursive option, so it forwards packets to default when the
next-hop is unavailable
route-map dst_80 q
match ip address 101
set ip next-hop recursive 202.53.x.x
Or, if not available in your version (unlikely) ,try adding a secondary
next-hop to the route-map
route-map dst_80 q
m
Jeroen,
We're doing AToM / EoMPLS on a few 7206VXR NPE-G1 with no problems, we're using
Ver 12.2(33)SRC6 IOS
Hope this helps
Ziv
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeroen van Ingen
Sent: Friday, January 21,
On 1/23/11 12:49 PM, Farooq Razzaque wrote:
>
>
> Hi All
>
> I am getting the following errors on 6500
>
> %SIBYTE-CFC10-3-CORRECTABLE_ECC_ERR: A correctable ECC error has occurred,
> A_BUS_L2_ERRORS: 0x0, A_BUS_MEMIO_ERRORS: 0xFF, A_SCD_BUS_ERR_STATUS:
> 0xC0DC3000
>
>
> Attached is the o
Hi All
I am getting the following errors on 6500
%SIBYTE-CFC10-3-CORRECTABLE_ECC_ERR: A correctable ECC error has occurred,
A_BUS_L2_ERRORS: 0x0, A_BUS_MEMIO_ERRORS: 0xFF, A_SCD_BUS_ERR_STATUS: 0xC0DC3000
Attached is the outputs of show environment command.
Apparently all the environment a
Hi guys,
Please guide me link on internet to download any good book for NGN
Carrier ethernet Design
which talks about VPLS,HVPLS, HQOS,OAM,Performance Monitoring,ERPS, etc
Regrads
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.ne
Sorry, I can't see any 12.2S images for this platform...
Arie
-Original Message-
From: Jeroen van Ingen [mailto:jer...@zijndomein.nl]
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 01:27
To: Arie Vayner (avayner)
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS on 7401ASR
Hi Arie, list,
> A qui
23 matches
Mail list logo