> That looks backwards...why not have the DG for internal hosts be the
> BigIP, and DG the BigIP to the inside of the FWSM?
>
> The BigIP does a good job of performing NAT, and doesn't need to be
> directly connected to the nodes in its pools...in fact, I would highly
> recommend against connecting
On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:52 PM, Lincoln Dale (ltd) wrote:
> Rubens,
>
>>> No. It is a linux kernel. The core system management & HA
>>> infrastructure is taken from SAN-OS (ie MDS) with Ethernet L2 & L3
>>> functionality laid on top.
>>
>> As the Linux kernel and some code commonly used on embedded
