Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME 3400 Switch + dot1.Q Tunneling

2011-05-10 Thread Christopher Pilkington
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Eric Cables wrote: > I'd also be interested in feedback on anyone with ME-3400/3600/3800 devices > deployed, specifically wrt REP implementations. +1. REP is relevant to our interests. That said, initially we plan on rolling out these switches with VRF-lite to se

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME 3400 Switch + dot1.Q Tunneling

2011-05-02 Thread Eric Cables
I'd also be interested in feedback on anyone with ME-3400/3600/3800 devices deployed, specifically wrt REP implementations. -- Eric Cables On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 12:18 PM, wrote: > > Just wondering if anyone here uses the Cisco ME 3400E Switch, and any > > comments on performance? Key feature

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME 3400 Switch + dot1.Q Tunneling

2011-05-02 Thread sthaug
> Just wondering if anyone here uses the Cisco ME 3400E Switch, and any > comments on performance? Key feature needed would be Layer2 dot1.Q > tunneling, and the other option is using the 3560G series. We use the ME-3400EG-12CS-M, mostly for the DC power supply and the possibility of using REP. Pe

[c-nsp] Cisco ME 3400 Switch + dot1.Q Tunneling

2011-05-02 Thread Dominic Ogbonna
Hi Everyone Just wondering if anyone here uses the Cisco ME 3400E Switch, and any comments on performance? Key feature needed would be Layer2 dot1.Q tunneling, and the other option is using the 3560G series. Dominic ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco