I realize nowthat's ok.
I'll do a test, configuring a "access-list x.x.x.x log-input" to punt these
packets to RP.
Maybe it works.
Regards.
Flickr agora em português. Você clica, todo mundo vê. Saiba mais.
___
cisco-nsp mailing
Leonardo Souza <> wrote on Friday, August 31, 2007 4:59 PM:
> Comments inline...
>
> "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Leonardo Souza <> wrote on Thursday, August 30, 2007 8:53 PM:
>
>> Correct.
>> I sent ping packets with 1500 bytes .
>> My problem is that on the o
Comments inline...
"Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:Leonardo Souza <>
wrote on Thursday, August 30, 2007 8:53 PM:
> Correct.
> I sent ping packets with 1500 bytes .
> My problem is that on the other side, I see no debug output for MLP
> (events, fragments etc...). By
Leonardo Souza <> wrote on Thursday, August 30, 2007 8:53 PM:
> Correct.
> I sent ping packets with 1500 bytes .
> My problem is that on the other side, I see no debug output for MLP
> (events, fragments etc...). By the way, it´s a C10K.
> It seems a bug. I dont know...
As the 10k process
Correct.
I sent ping packets with 1500 bytes .
My problem is that on the other side, I see no debug output for MLP (events,
fragments etc...).
By the way, it´s a C10K.
It seems a bug. I dont know...
Regards.
"Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
Leonardo Souza
Leonardo Souza <> wrote on Thursday, August 30, 2007 4:23 PM:
> Hi mates.
> Maybe somebody can help me.
> I configured MLPoATM and LFI.
> According this debug, can I be sure both the routers are doing
> fragmentation?
>
> Router#
> *Mar 1 18:27:12.420: Vi3 MLP: I frag C041 size 49
Hi mates.
Maybe somebody can help me.
I configured MLPoATM and LFI.
According this debug, can I be sure both the routers are doing fragmentation?
Router#
*Mar 1 18:27:12.420: Vi3 MLP: I frag C041 size 49 encsize 2
*Mar 1 18:27:12.420: Vi3 MLP: O frag C064 size 57 encsize 1