Re: [c-nsp] Management Vlan VS Vlan1

2009-08-20 Thread Murphy, William
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of shadow floating Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 12:19 AM To: Brett Frankenberger Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Management Vlan VS Vlan1 Thanks alot guys for all your informative response, but still if I migrate the

Re: [c-nsp] Management Vlan VS Vlan1

2009-08-19 Thread shadow floating
Thanks alot guys for all your informative response, but still if I migrate the management VLAN from VLAN 1 to another VLAN , won't I have to protect 2 VLANs instead of just taking care of VLAN 1?..is there any good reason prevent one from using VLAN1 for management and restrict access from other VL

Re: [c-nsp] Management Vlan VS Vlan1

2009-08-19 Thread Brett Frankenberger
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:56:23AM -0500, Murphy, William wrote: > In all recent IOS versions and switching hardware you can disable > VLAN 1 on trunk ports (switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1) and > the protocols you mentioned will still continue to function. This is > how Cisco recommends yo

Re: [c-nsp] Management Vlan VS Vlan1

2009-08-19 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, > I would not use VLAN for disabled ports either, create a PARK vlan and > reassign all > unused diabled ports to the PARK vlan. That wy vlan 1 has no chance to be > mistakenly > activated. aye - we have a similar 'blackhole' VLAN which is present but doesnt do anything. (i was toying with th

Re: [c-nsp] Management Vlan VS Vlan1

2009-08-19 Thread Murphy, William
...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of shadow floating Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:49 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Management Vlan VS Vlan1 Hi All, I just have a question, as we know that Cisco preserve VLAN 1 for management issues and network

Re: [c-nsp] Management Vlan VS Vlan1

2009-08-19 Thread Mark Tinka
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 03:02:55 pm Seth Mattinen wrote: > I don't use VLAN 1 at all anywhere. Except for the > disabled ports. Same here. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Management Vlan VS Vlan1

2009-08-19 Thread harbor235
I would not use VLAN for disabled ports either, create a PARK vlan and reassign all unused diabled ports to the PARK vlan. That wy vlan 1 has no chance to be mistakenly activated. mike On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > shadow floating wrote: > > Hi All, > > I just have a q

Re: [c-nsp] Management Vlan VS Vlan1

2009-08-19 Thread Seth Mattinen
shadow floating wrote: > Hi All, > I just have a question, as we know that Cisco preserve VLAN 1 for > management issues and network management needed protocols like CDP, > VTP and the like, and all access from other VLANs to this VLAN should > be restricted except from the management VLAN, as for

[c-nsp] Management Vlan VS Vlan1

2009-08-18 Thread shadow floating
Hi All, I just have a question, as we know that Cisco preserve VLAN 1 for management issues and network management needed protocols like CDP, VTP and the like, and all access from other VLANs to this VLAN should be restricted except from the management VLAN, as for our network, we are implementing