Re: [c-nsp] Non-fatal interrupt FIB

2016-11-09 Thread Anders Löwinger
2016-11-09 16:18 GMT+01:00 James Bensley : > > If the device is using ECC memory I would have expected the memory to > correct the error in hardware without and software input. Ho-hum... Nope, that is not how it normally works. Read 72-bit, ECC does it magic returning 64 bits. If one bit error

Re: [c-nsp] Non-fatal interrupt FIB

2016-11-09 Thread James Bensley
On 8 November 2016 at 19:04, Anders Löwinger wrote: > Den 2016-11-08 kl. 19:26, skrev James Bensley: >> >> From what I could see the articles were suggesting there was a single >> bit error which was corrected due to the use of ECC memory (I guess >> this could throw an interrupt? not sure why th

Re: [c-nsp] Non-fatal interrupt FIB

2016-11-08 Thread Anders Löwinger
Den 2016-11-08 kl. 19:26, skrev James Bensley: From what I could see the articles were suggesting there was a single bit error which was corrected due to the use of ECC memory (I guess this could throw an interrupt? not sure why though). Typically the interrupt handler does a read/write of the

Re: [c-nsp] Non-fatal interrupt FIB

2016-11-08 Thread James Bensley
On 8 November 2016 at 18:13, Randy wrote: > Hi and thank you for the pointer. > > I did see those articles talking about "Packet..." messages but could not > find any description of what exactly "FIB Interrupt" is implying. > > However if regardless, it's a harmless message, I guess that's all the

Re: [c-nsp] Non-fatal interrupt FIB

2016-11-08 Thread Randy
Hi and thank you for the pointer. I did see those articles talking about "Packet..." messages but could not find any description of what exactly "FIB Interrupt" is implying. However if regardless, it's a harmless message, I guess that's all the info I need. --- ~Randy On 11/08/2016 1:58 am

Re: [c-nsp] Non-fatal interrupt FIB

2016-11-08 Thread James Bensley
On 8 November 2016 at 04:23, Randy wrote: > Hi all, > > Got these two messages, each from two separate 65k's -- only once and within > weeks of each other after 300+ days uptime > > Router2: %EARL_L3_ASIC-SPSTBY-3-INTR_WARN: EARL L3 ASIC: Non-fatal interrupt > FIB interrupt > > Router1: %EARL_L3_A

[c-nsp] Non-fatal interrupt FIB

2016-11-07 Thread Randy
Hi all, Got these two messages, each from two separate 65k's -- only once and within weeks of each other after 300+ days uptime Router2: %EARL_L3_ASIC-SPSTBY-3-INTR_WARN: EARL L3 ASIC: Non-fatal interrupt FIB interrupt Router1: %EARL_L3_ASIC-DFC2-3-INTR_WARN: EARL L3 ASIC: Non-fatal interr