Peter Rathlev wrote:
> I hope you did this in a lab or something similar. :-) The "desktop
> vlan" is not intended for routing, as in "show sdm prefer vlan | incl
> unicast IPv4" gives you a clear "0". The 3550 simply wouldn't allow any
> routing with that template. The 3560 appears to process swit
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 08:40 +0100, Mark Dauven wrote:
> I've no direct answers to your questions. But I have had run a 3560G
> with about a dozen layer 3 interface and a few ACLs in "desktop vlan"
> mode. There wasn't any log message about it. But the performance wasn't
> very good (seemed traff
There is an interesting doc here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps646/products_tech_note09186a0080094bc6.shtml
We have been using 10 routed interfaces on a 3550 for many months without any
problems. But this 3550 doesn't have a lot of
traffic. We had another 3550 with 8 routed
Alex A. Pavlenko wrote:
> The question is what does "8 routed interfaces" exactly mean?
> Is it a maximum number of SVIs or routed ports that I can configure on a
> switch?
> What happens when I configure 9 or more SVIs?
>
I've no direct answers to your questions. But I have had run a 3560G
wi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev man, 03 dec 2007:
> I've got 3550-48's running with nearly all ports running as L3 routed
> ports. It'd be nice if there were some way to examine TCAM usage and see
> what sort of shape these switches are in. All I know is, they're working.
AFAIK a L3 routed port is no di
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Peter Salanki wrote:
> I disagree, you can have tons of SVIs even if your sh sdm says "8
> routed interfaces". I have never tested more than 8 physical routed
> ports though.
I've got 3550-48's running with nearly all ports running as L3 routed
ports. It'd be nice if there w
I disagree, you can have tons of SVIs even if your sh sdm says "8
routed interfaces". I have never tested more than 8 physical routed
ports though.
Sincerely,
Peter Salanki
Solutions Architect
Procera Networks
On Dec 3, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 07:23 -0
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 15:51 +0100, Peter Salanki wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> > It's not just "no switchport" interfaces, SVIs are also routed
> > interfaces in this context.
> I disagree, you can have tons of SVIs even if your sh sdm says "8
> routed interfaces".
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 07:23 -0500, Gary Stanley wrote:
> 8 routed interfaces are 8 layer3 (ie: no switchport etc) ports.
It's not just "no switchport" interfaces, SVIs are also routed
interfaces in this context.
Regards,
Peter Rathlev
___
cisco-nsp ma
At 07:13 AM 12/3/2007, Alex A. Pavlenko wrote:
>Dear colleagues!
>
>Consider simple output of "show sdm prefer" command on cat3560G
>LOP3-1#sh sdm pref
> The current template is "desktop default" template.
> The selected template optimizes the resources in
> the switch to support this level of f
On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 15:13 +0300, Alex A. Pavlenko wrote:
> Dear colleagues!
>
> Consider simple output of "show sdm prefer" command on cat3560G
> LOP3-1#sh sdm pref
> The current template is "desktop default" template.
> The selected template optimizes the resources in
> the switch to support
Dear colleagues!
Consider simple output of "show sdm prefer" command on cat3560G
LOP3-1#sh sdm pref
The current template is "desktop default" template.
The selected template optimizes the resources in
the switch to support this level of features for
8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANs.
...the
12 matches
Mail list logo
