On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 15:52, Doug Hardie wrote:
> Those certainly could be it, but it is unusual compared with the other
> viruses we see daily. I wonder if there is more to this one than has
> been foun yet.
I've noticed that Zafi.B is most often spread through backscatter. So,
perhaps you ar
Those certainly could be it, but it is unusual compared with the other
viruses we see daily. I wonder if there is more to this one than has
been foun yet.
On Sep 8, 2004, at 12:40, Timo Schöler wrote:
Thus spake Doug Hardie sometime Today...
On Sep 8, 2004, at 12:16, Timo Schöler wrote:
Doug Ha
Thus spake Doug Hardie sometime Today...
On Sep 8, 2004, at 12:16, Timo Schöler wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a cron job that scans the clamd.log file every day and counts
the specific virusus found. While the numbers tend to vary a bit
from day to day the relative ratios between the various
Doug Hardie wrote:
I have a cron job that scans the clamd.log file every day and counts
the specific virusus found. While the numbers tend to vary a bit from
day to day the relative ratios between the various viruses found tend
to stay the same - except for Worm.Zafi.B. One day it will find 11
I have a cron job that scans the clamd.log file every day and counts
the specific virusus found. While the numbers tend to vary a bit from
day to day the relative ratios between the various viruses found tend
to stay the same - except for Worm.Zafi.B. One day it will find 1100
of them and the