On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:55:22 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> In [JDK-8322772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8322772) one similar
>> cleanup has been proposed before (and was done in the change). But there are
>> a number of other places in the codebase where the import is done and still
>
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:55:22 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> In [JDK-8322772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8322772) one similar
>> cleanup has been proposed before (and was done in the change). But there are
>> a number of other places in the codebase where the import is done and still
>
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:55:22 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> In [JDK-8322772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8322772) one similar
>> cleanup has been proposed before (and was done in the change). But there are
>> a number of other places in the codebase where the import is done and still
>
> In [JDK-8322772](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8322772) one similar
> cleanup has been proposed before (and was done in the change). But there are
> a number of other places in the codebase where the import is done and still
> the unneeded fully qualified class name "java.util.Arrays" is
