On Nov 25, 2013, at 21:11 , Luther Baker wrote:
> Maybe I am missing something - but I just created a new Tab based project
> and dropped a UITableView directly on the FirstViewController, under the
> "View" node in the expanding tree. If I right click on the UITableView, I
> see both the delega
Yes, thanks for inserting the "not".
If I drop a UITableView on an existing UIViewController in the default
storyboard for a new Tab based application, I can click on the UITableView
and select from "static cells" or "dynamic content" in the TableView
content section in the right hand Utilities pa
Maybe I am missing something - but I just created a new Tab based project
and dropped a UITableView directly on the FirstViewController, under the
"View" node in the expanding tree. If I right click on the UITableView, I
see both the delegate and datasource outlets. I can click them and easily
drag
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 6:51 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 18:48 , Kyle Sluder wrote:
>>
>> Sure, you could, but why? Then your container VC has to reach in to your
>> table view controller and point its table view at itself.
>>
>> Why not just do the sensible thing and make
On Nov 25, 2013, at 18:48 , Kyle Sluder wrote:
> Sure, you could, but why? Then your container VC has to reach in to your
> table view controller and point its table view at itself.
>
> Why not just do the sensible thing and make the container VC responsible for
> managing the bar and positio
I'm not convinced this is the best way. I can't drag-connect the table view
controller's delegate and dataSource in IB when it's done this way.
On Nov 25, 2013, at 18:40 , Luther Baker wrote:
> Dropping a UITableView inside of a UIViewController that conforms to the
> tableview's delegate and
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 6:33 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 25, 2013, at 18:16 , Kyle Sluder wrote:
>>
>> Use an custom container view controller, and watch the WWDC videos on view
>> controller containment to learn why this is the right thing to do.
>
> Can I put an unsubclasses UITableV
On Nov 25, 2013, at 18:40 , Luther Baker wrote:
> UITableViewController is convenient but at all necessary.
Is there a missing "not" in there?
It's necessary if you want to use the static and dynamic cell creation stuff in
IB.
--
Rick
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with Open
Dropping a UITableView inside of a UIViewController that conforms to the
tableview's delegate and datasource is literally as easy as it sounds ... and
immensely more flexible.
UITableViewController is convenient but at all necessary.
On Nov 25, 2013, at 8:16 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
>> On Nov 2
On Nov 25, 2013, at 18:16 , Kyle Sluder wrote:
> Use an custom container view controller, and watch the WWDC videos on view
> controller containment to learn why this is the right thing to do.
Can I put an unsubclasses UITableViewController in there, and let my container
VC be the dataSource
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 6:08 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
>
> Dynamically at runtime, I'd like to put a fixed banner across the top of a
> UITableViewController scene with some status information. I want this banner
> to remain fixed at the top, and for the UITableView to live in a frame below
> it.
>
Dynamically at runtime, I'd like to put a fixed banner across the top of a
UITableViewController scene with some status information. I want this banner to
remain fixed at the top, and for the UITableView to live in a frame below it.
IB doesn't let you construct this. I wrote this as a bug/enhanc
You want AVCaptureSession.
--Kyle Sluder
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 9:53 AM, Motti Shneor wrote:
>
> Hello everyone.
>
> This seems a novice question, but I have scanned Apple Mac-Dev-Center site
> and I dived into all kinds of documentation, to no avail.
> It seems that some basic functionality
Hello everyone.
This seems a novice question, but I have scanned Apple Mac-Dev-Center site and
I dived into all kinds of documentation, to no avail.
It seems that some basic functionality that was once beautifully covered by the
grand "QuickTime" API-set has split into so many parts of the sys
I haven't seen anything that directly returns this information. Given that, it
might be better to take the approach of choosing the number of cards that look
good on an iPad mini and not worrying so much that there are "too few" on a
full-sized iPad.
On Nov 25, 2013, at 4:40 AM, Roland King w
Le 25 nov. 2013 à 10:23, Gerriet M. Denkmann a écrit :
> The documentation states: "CFArray is “toll-free bridged” with its Cocoa
> Foundation counterpart, NSArray. This means that the Core Foundation type is
> interchangeable in function or method calls with the bridged Foundation
> object.
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Matthieu Bouron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First of all, sorry in advance if i'm not addressing the right mailing
> list.
>
> I'm currently using the CVPixelBufferRef API and more precisely
> the CVPixelBufferCreateWithPlanarBytes function so I can use my own video
> bu
Is there yet a supported way of finding out the actual screen size (or
equivalently pixel density) on an iOS screen?
I have an app, uses autolayout, works fine on iPhone (one storyboard), iPad
(another storyboard) and mostly looks fine between iPad and iPad mini. One
screen however has a numbe
I don't believe that the array that CTFontCopyAvailableTables() returns
contains CFTypes. So yes, CFArray is bridgeable. But in this case that
isn't so useful since the values aren't.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Gerriet M. Denkmann
wrote:
> The documentation states: "CFArray is “toll-free b
The documentation states: "CFArray is “toll-free bridged” with its Cocoa
Foundation counterpart, NSArray. This means that the Core Foundation type is
interchangeable in function or method calls with the bridged Foundation object.
Therefore, in a method where you see an NSArray * parameter, you c
20 matches
Mail list logo
