On 28 Aug 2008, at 22:15, Eric Gorr wrote:
On Aug 28, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Bob Sabiston wrote:
On Aug 27, 2008, at 8:30 PM, CocoaDev Admins wrote:
I've been given explicit instructions to enforce the non-
disclosure agreement when moderating this list. So that's what I do.
The admins in the
thanks for you comments and understanding, but please direct them off-
list rather than to cocoa-dev.
scott
[moderator[
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contac
On Aug 28, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Bob Sabiston wrote:
On Aug 27, 2008, at 8:30 PM, CocoaDev Admins wrote:
I've been given explicit instructions to enforce the non-disclosure
agreement when moderating this list. So that's what I do.
The admins in the discussions groups should be following the s
On Aug 27, 2008, at 8:30 PM, CocoaDev Admins wrote:
I've been given explicit instructions to enforce the non-disclosure
agreement when moderating this list. So that's what I do.
The admins in the discussions groups should be following the same
rules, and I've passed along the information.
CocoaDev is still valuable for iPhone development. learning the basics
of Objective-C, @properties, the shared foundation aspects..
Yes, as it is the fact that there is a disconnect there is confusing
people. Attempts to clarify this are in the works.
Please, if you have issues with the SDK
Not to mention that the Apple evangelist in the videos tell us to use
the cocoa-dev list as a resource I had emailed this group with that
question, but the email was denied. Why is apples messaging so flip/
flop?
James
On Aug 27, 2008, at 9:30 PM, CocoaDev Admins wrote:
I've been given
I've been given explicit instructions to enforce the non-disclosure
agreement when moderating this list. So that's what I do.
The admins in the discussions groups should be following the same
rules, and I've passed along the information.
scott
[moderator]
On 27-Aug-08, at 7:30 PM, Bob Sabi