Re: [Moderator] iPhone discussion here - RETRACTION

2008-03-11 Thread Brady Duga
On Mar 11, 2008, at 3:31 AM, Gustavo Eulalio wrote: That`s funny, because in the iPhone SDK intro videos we're instructed to get more information here, in this list. I wish they'd make up their mind. Presumably they did not want to make two sets of videos, one for the beta instructing them

Re: [Moderator] iPhone discussion here - RETRACTION

2008-03-11 Thread Hamish Allan
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:56 AM, has <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > #1 - The first rule of iPhone SDK is, you do not talk about iPhone SDK. > > #2 - The second rule of iPhone SDK is, you DO NOT talk about iPhone SDK. The one-and-a-halfth rule of iPhone SDK is, you are welcome to talk about iPhon

Re: [Moderator] iPhone discussion here - RETRACTION

2008-03-11 Thread I. Savant
On Mar 11, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Gustavo Eulalio wrote: That`s funny, because in the iPhone SDK intro videos we're instructed to get more information here, in this list. I wish they'd make up their mind. Though I made the joke that I blame Scott, it's just that - a joke. Keep in mind that he's

Re: [Moderator] iPhone discussion here - RETRACTION

2008-03-11 Thread Gustavo Eulalio
That`s funny, because in the iPhone SDK intro videos we're instructed to get more information here, in this list. I wish they'd make up their mind. -- Gustavo Eulalio [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Scott Anguish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apparently there has been some mis

Re: [Moderator] iPhone discussion here - RETRACTION

2008-03-10 Thread Philip Ershler
Sorry, can't talk about that here! ; > ) On Mar 10, 2008, at 10:11 PM, Jacob Bandes-Storch wrote: So are we or are we not getting a specialized (password-protected, probably) discussion area for the iPhone SDK? On Mar 10, 2008, at 6:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That sounds surprisingl

Re: [Moderator] iPhone discussion here - RETRACTION

2008-03-10 Thread Jacob Bandes-Storch
So are we or are we not getting a specialized (password-protected, probably) discussion area for the iPhone SDK? On Mar 10, 2008, at 6:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That sounds surprisingly plausible. I imagine a big speech bubble above the Apple campus that says, "Well, I'm glad we got al

Re: [Moderator] iPhone discussion here - RETRACTION

2008-03-10 Thread Dave Hersey
That sounds surprisingly plausible. I imagine a big speech bubble above the Apple campus that says, "Well, I'm glad we got all our ducks in a row for that iPhone SDK release!" Meanwhile, cute little baby ducks are running at everyone's feet, riding the elevators up and down, quacking during

Re: [Moderator] iPhone discussion here - RETRACTION

2008-03-10 Thread has
Scott Anguish wrote: So we're back to the 'no iPhone discussion is allowed' state of things. #1 - The first rule of iPhone SDK is, you do not talk about iPhone SDK. #2 - The second rule of iPhone SDK is, you DO NOT talk about iPhone SDK. ... ___

Re: [Moderator] iPhone discussion here - RETRACTION

2008-03-10 Thread Rob Keniger
On 11/03/2008, at 9:55 AM, I. Savant wrote: Somewhere in Cupertino, somebody's standing next to the big "NDA" switch in the iPhone room, giggling maniacally as they flip it on- off-on-off-... :-D Or, more specifically, *slide* it on-off-on-off. Sorry. -- Rob Keniger __

Re: [Moderator] iPhone discussion here - RETRACTION

2008-03-10 Thread I. Savant
While I was told to allow discussion here, I've now been told that discussion should not be allowed here. Oh, that's just MEAN! Somewhere in Cupertino, somebody's standing next to the big "NDA" switch in the iPhone room, giggling maniacally as they flip it on-off- on-off-... :-D -- I.

[Moderator] iPhone discussion here - RETRACTION

2008-03-10 Thread Scott Anguish
Apparently there has been some miscommunication somewhere. While I was told to allow discussion here, I've now been told that discussion should not be allowed here. So we're back to the 'no iPhone discussion is allowed' state of things. Sorry for the confusion. Scott Anguish __